vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of UFP TECHNOLOGIES INC (UFPT) and Planet Image International Ltd (YIBO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UFP TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($148.9M vs $80.7M, roughly 1.8× Planet Image International Ltd). UFP TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 11.8% vs -0.3%, a 12.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
UFP Technologies, Inc. is an American multinational developer and custom manufacturer of comprehensive solutions for medical devices, sterile packaging, and other highly engineered custom products.
Planet Labs PBC, known as "Planet.", is a publicly traded American Earth imaging company based in San Francisco, California. Their goal is to image the entirety of the Earth daily to monitor changes and pinpoint trends.
UFPT vs YIBO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $148.9M | $80.7M |
| Net Profit | $17.6M | $-213.0K |
| Gross Margin | 28.2% | 26.9% |
| Operating Margin | 14.4% | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | 11.8% | -0.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.22 | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $148.9M | $80.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $154.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $151.2M | $74.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $148.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $144.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $145.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $110.2M | $77.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $105.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $17.6M | $-213.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.2M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.6M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 28.2% | 26.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.8% | 32.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.0% | 36.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 14.4% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.1% | -14.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.3% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 11.8% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.4% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.3% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.22 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.11 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.21 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.21 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.08 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.11 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.75 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.64 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $20.3M | $54.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $135.5M | $8.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $423.9M | $57.9M |
| Total Assets | $655.1M | $154.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.32× | 0.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $20.3M | $54.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.9M | $54.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | $53.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $135.5M | $8.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $163.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $163.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $189.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $212.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $423.9M | $57.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $403.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $385.5M | $58.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $360.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $342.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $329.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $310.2M | $53.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $295.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $655.1M | $154.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $652.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $634.7M | $140.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $642.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $629.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $638.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $422.4M | $139.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $407.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.32× | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.12× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $16.8M | $2.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 2.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.96× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $16.8M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.3M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.5M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | -6.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.96× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.19× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.80× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.21× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.84× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
UFPT
| Products | $145.1M | 97% |
| Engineering And Development | $1.8M | 1% |
YIBO
Segment breakdown not available.
