vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Universal Health Services (UHS) and Williams Companies (WMB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Universal Health Services is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.5B vs $3.8B, roughly 1.2× Williams Companies). Williams Companies runs the higher net margin — 19.1% vs 8.0%, a 11.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Williams Companies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.7% vs 8.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Williams Companies's revenue compounded faster (7.3% CAGR vs 7.3%).
Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) is an American Fortune 500 company that provides hospital and healthcare services, based in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. In 2024, UHS reported total revenues of $15.8 billion.
The Williams Companies, Inc. is an American energy company based in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Its core business is natural gas processing and transportation, with additional petroleum and electricity generation assets. A Fortune 500 company, its common stock is a component of the S&P 500.
UHS vs WMB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.5B | $3.8B |
| Net Profit | $358.7M | $734.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.2% | 27.3% |
| Net Margin | 8.0% | 19.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.2% | 12.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 11.5% | 51.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $5.65 | $0.60 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.3B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | $358.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $445.9M | $734.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $373.0M | $647.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $353.2M | $546.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $316.7M | $691.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $332.4M | $486.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $258.7M | $706.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $289.2M | $401.0M |
| Q1 26 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.5% | 27.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | 31.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.7% | 28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.1% | 26.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.5% | 23.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | 27.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | 24.4% |
| Q1 26 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.3% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 16.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 16.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 14.1% |
| Q1 26 | $5.65 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.01 | $0.60 | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.86 | $0.53 | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.43 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.80 | $0.56 | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.94 | $0.39 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.80 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.26 | $0.33 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $119.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.7B | $27.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.5B | $12.8B |
| Total Assets | $15.7B | $58.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | 2.13× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $137.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $112.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $137.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $126.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $126.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $106.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $128.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.8B | $27.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7B | $25.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.6B | $25.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | $24.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $24.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.7B | $24.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | $24.1B |
| Q1 26 | $7.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.3B | $12.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $12.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0B | $12.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $12.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.7B | $12.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.6B | $12.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.5B | $12.3B |
| Q1 26 | $15.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.5B | $58.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.3B | $55.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.0B | $56.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9B | $54.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.5B | $54.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.4B | $53.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.1B | $52.4B |
| Q1 26 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.65× | 2.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.66× | 2.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.65× | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.68× | 1.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.68× | 1.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.71× | 2.00× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.69× | 1.96× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $401.6M | $1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-379.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -9.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.8% | 50.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.12× | 2.15× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $401.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $574.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $380.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $549.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $360.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $658.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $333.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $679.3M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $293.5M | $-379.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.8M | $485.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $283.0M | $478.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $121.0M | $421.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $412.5M | $450.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $85.0M | $561.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $437.9M | $700.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | -9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | 10.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.0% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | 24.6% |
| Q1 26 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | 50.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.1% | 27.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | 28.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.0% | 22.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | 20.3% |
| Q1 26 | 1.12× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.29× | 2.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.02× | 2.22× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.55× | 2.66× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.14× | 2.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | 2.51× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.29× | 1.76× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.35× | 3.19× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
UHS
Segment breakdown not available.
WMB
| Services | $2.2B | 57% |
| Natural Gas Us Regulated | $740.0M | 19% |
| West | $730.0M | 19% |
| Non Regulated Service Commodity Consideration | $51.0M | 1% |
| Natural Gas Gathering Transportation Marketing And Processing | $45.0M | 1% |
| Affiliated Entity | $23.0M | 1% |
| Other | $14.0M | 0% |
| Other Service | $11.0M | 0% |
