vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of UNIVERSAL HEALTH REALTY INCOME TRUST (UHT) and Venus Concept Inc. (VERO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UNIVERSAL HEALTH REALTY INCOME TRUST is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($24.5M vs $13.8M, roughly 1.8× Venus Concept Inc.). UNIVERSAL HEALTH REALTY INCOME TRUST runs the higher net margin — 17.7% vs -163.8%, a 181.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UNIVERSAL HEALTH REALTY INCOME TRUST posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.7% vs -8.2%). Over the past eight quarters, UNIVERSAL HEALTH REALTY INCOME TRUST's revenue compounded faster (-1.3% CAGR vs -12.8%).
Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) is an American Fortune 500 company that provides hospital and healthcare services, based in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. In 2024, UHS reported total revenues of $15.8 billion.
Venus Concept Inc is a global medical technology firm specializing in the development, manufacturing, and distribution of non-invasive and minimally invasive aesthetic medical devices. Its product portfolio covers hair removal, skin rejuvenation, body contouring, and anti-aging solutions, serving dermatology clinics, plastic surgery centers, and medical spas across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific markets.
UHT vs VERO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $24.5M | $13.8M |
| Net Profit | $4.3M | $-22.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 64.0% |
| Operating Margin | 34.7% | -68.9% |
| Net Margin | 17.7% | -163.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.7% | -8.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -7.2% | -143.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.32 | $-12.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $24.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.3M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.9M | $15.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.5M | $13.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.6M | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.5M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.7M | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.1M | $17.5M |
| Q4 25 | $4.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $-22.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.7M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3M | $-9.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 64.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 60.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 64.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 69.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 66.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 71.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 66.6% |
| Q4 25 | 34.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.2% | -68.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.6% | -57.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.8% | -69.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.6% | -42.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.7% | -47.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.7% | -33.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 37.6% | -44.4% |
| Q4 25 | 17.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | -163.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.1% | -74.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.5% | -90.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.9% | -50.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.3% | -61.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.3% | -120.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.1% | -56.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.29 | $-12.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.32 | $-8.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.34 | $-17.44 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.34 | $-10.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.29 | $-13.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.38 | $-30.93 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.38 | $-16.92 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $6.7M | $4.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $374.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $152.4M | $2.7M |
| Total Assets | $564.9M | $61.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.46× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $6.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9M | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.6M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $3.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1M | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4M | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.7M | $5.1M |
| Q4 25 | $374.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $368.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $152.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $158.6M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $165.2M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $172.2M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $179.5M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $181.6M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $190.7M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $196.5M | $-22.5M |
| Q4 25 | $564.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $568.0M | $61.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $573.0M | $63.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $573.5M | $63.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $580.9M | $68.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $584.3M | $72.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $586.6M | $79.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $596.2M | $85.1M |
| Q4 25 | 2.46× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $49.1M | $-4.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-4.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -35.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 11.35× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-20.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $49.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.2M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.7M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.6M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.9M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.7M | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -35.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -35.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -24.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -16.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | 11.35× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.54× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.05× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.43× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.06× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.48× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.30× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.21× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
UHT
| Reportable Segment Aggregation Before Other Operating Segment | $23.1M | 94% |
| Equity Method Investment Nonconsolidated Investee Or Group Of Investees | $2.3M | 9% |
VERO
| Products And Services | $10.8M | 79% |
| Leases | $2.9M | 21% |
