vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Unusual Machines, Inc. (UMAC) and AIRWA INC. (YYAI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Unusual Machines, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.9M vs $3.0M, roughly 1.6× AIRWA INC.). AIRWA INC. runs the higher net margin — -7.4% vs -215.7%, a 208.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AIRWA INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (729.8% vs 144.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Unusual Machines, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (181.3% CAGR vs 14.3%).
Thinking Machines Lab Inc. is an American artificial intelligence (AI) startup founded by Mira Murati, the former chief technology officer of OpenAI. The company was founded in February 2025, and by July had completed an early-stage funding round led by Andreessen Horowitz, raising $2 billion at a valuation of $12 billion overall from investors such as Nvidia, AMD, Cisco, and Jane Street. The company is based in San Francisco and structured as a public benefit corporation.
Flying W Airways (FWA) was a briefly high-profile publicly-traded company of the late 1960s/early 1970s, which originated in 1961 when its founders opened Flying W Airport in New Jersey as a fly-in resort. FWA became a bet on Alaskan oil and at its peak in 1969 attracted investment by the Matlack family, had two Hollywood actors on its board and bought Red Dodge Aviation (RDA) of Alaska, for which it acquired Lockheed L-100 Hercules aircraft, to take advantage of forthcoming Alaska pipeline c...
UMAC vs YYAI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.9M | $3.0M |
| Net Profit | $-10.6M | $-221.8K |
| Gross Margin | 36.2% | 75.2% |
| Operating Margin | -198.7% | 1.8% |
| Net Margin | -215.7% | -7.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 144.4% | 729.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 61.0% | 83.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.26 | $-0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.9M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | $3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0M | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4M | $-701.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $618.9K | — |
| Q4 25 | $-10.6M | $-221.8K | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.0M | $552.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | $-411.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-27.1M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.1M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 36.2% | 75.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.4% | 75.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.4% | 75.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.3% | 77.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.7% | 77.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.1% | 77.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -198.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -232.4% | 49.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -338.5% | 42.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -160.0% | 16.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -642.3% | 71.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -95.4% | 74.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -111.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -175.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | -215.7% | -7.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 75.1% | 42.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -327.9% | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -159.9% | -12.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1353.2% | -41.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -140.0% | -129.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -114.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -178.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.26 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.32 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.21 | $-1.41 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.20 | $6.43 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.30 | $-1.91 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.16 | $-30.98 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.18 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $142.5M | $107.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $174.9M | $165.4M |
| Total Assets | $182.7M | $172.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $142.5M | $107.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $81.1M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.9M | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0M | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8M | $18.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $18.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $1.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $174.9M | $165.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.0M | $26.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.3M | $25.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.9M | $26.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.8M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.2M | $9.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.0M | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $182.7M | $172.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $113.1M | $34.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.4M | $32.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.3M | $30.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.1M | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.5M | $23.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.2M | $23.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.2M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.8M | $-30.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.8M | $-30.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.5M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.7M | $-423.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2M | $-133.8K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.3M | $779.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-536.7K | $-601.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-986.2K | $-460.3K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -413.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.70× | -0.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
UMAC
| Retail Revenue | $4.5M | 92% |
| Other | $412.7K | 8% |
YYAI
Segment breakdown not available.
