vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of UNITIL CORP (UTL) and WisdomTree, Inc. (WT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

UNITIL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($161.5M vs $147.4M, roughly 1.1× WisdomTree, Inc.). WisdomTree, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 27.1% vs 11.8%, a 15.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WisdomTree, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (33.2% vs 26.7%). WisdomTree, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($147.7M vs $-36.3M). Over the past eight quarters, WisdomTree, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (23.4% CAGR vs -4.9%).

Unitil Corporation is an interstate electricity and natural gas utility company that provides services for New Hampshire, Massachusetts and Maine. Its earliest predecessor company, the Portland Gas Light Company, was founded in Maine in 1849. The current company was set up in 1984 and is based in New Hampshire. With a market cap of 686.51M, it provides electric services to about 102,400 customers and natural gas to over 75,900 customers. The service territory of Unitil includes business distr...

WisdomTree, Inc. is a global exchange-traded fund (ETF) and exchange-traded product (ETP) sponsor and asset manager with headquarters in New York. WisdomTree launched its first ETFs in June 2006, and became one of the major ETF providers in the United States. WisdomTree sponsors different ETFs that span asset classes and countries worldwide. Categories include: U.S. and International Equity, Currency, Fixed Income and Alternatives.

UTL vs WT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
UTL
UTL
1.1× larger
UTL
$161.5M
$147.4M
WT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
WT
WT
+6.5% gap
WT
33.2%
26.7%
UTL
Higher net margin
WT
WT
15.4% more per $
WT
27.1%
11.8%
UTL
More free cash flow
WT
WT
$184.0M more FCF
WT
$147.7M
$-36.3M
UTL
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
WT
WT
Annualised
WT
23.4%
-4.9%
UTL

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
UTL
UTL
WT
WT
Revenue
$161.5M
$147.4M
Net Profit
$19.0M
$40.0M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
21.5%
40.5%
Net Margin
11.8%
27.1%
Revenue YoY
26.7%
33.2%
Net Profit YoY
21.8%
46.6%
EPS (diluted)
$1.05
$0.28

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
UTL
UTL
WT
WT
Q4 25
$161.5M
$147.4M
Q3 25
$101.1M
$125.6M
Q2 25
$102.6M
$112.6M
Q1 25
$170.8M
$108.1M
Q4 24
$127.5M
$110.7M
Q3 24
$92.9M
$113.2M
Q2 24
$95.7M
$107.0M
Q1 24
$178.7M
$96.8M
Net Profit
UTL
UTL
WT
WT
Q4 25
$19.0M
$40.0M
Q3 25
$-300.0K
$19.7M
Q2 25
$4.0M
$24.8M
Q1 25
$27.5M
$24.6M
Q4 24
$15.6M
$27.3M
Q3 24
$0
$-4.5M
Q2 24
$4.3M
$21.8M
Q1 24
$27.2M
$22.1M
Operating Margin
UTL
UTL
WT
WT
Q4 25
21.5%
40.5%
Q3 25
6.9%
36.3%
Q2 25
13.0%
30.8%
Q1 25
27.0%
31.6%
Q4 24
22.1%
31.7%
Q3 24
6.2%
36.0%
Q2 24
13.0%
31.3%
Q1 24
24.7%
28.9%
Net Margin
UTL
UTL
WT
WT
Q4 25
11.8%
27.1%
Q3 25
-0.3%
15.7%
Q2 25
3.9%
22.0%
Q1 25
16.1%
22.8%
Q4 24
12.2%
24.7%
Q3 24
-4.0%
Q2 24
4.5%
20.3%
Q1 24
15.2%
22.8%
EPS (diluted)
UTL
UTL
WT
WT
Q4 25
$1.05
$0.28
Q3 25
$-0.02
$0.13
Q2 25
$0.25
$0.17
Q1 25
$1.69
$0.17
Q4 24
$0.97
$0.20
Q3 24
$0.00
$-0.13
Q2 24
$0.27
$0.13
Q1 24
$1.69
$0.13

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
UTL
UTL
WT
WT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$15.6M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$670.5M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$609.6M
$413.7M
Total Assets
$2.1B
$1.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.10×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
UTL
UTL
WT
WT
Q4 25
$15.6M
Q3 25
$14.6M
Q2 25
$8.5M
Q1 25
$10.2M
Q4 24
$6.3M
Q3 24
$6.3M
Q2 24
$2.8M
$132.5M
Q1 24
$6.3M
$116.9M
Total Debt
UTL
UTL
WT
WT
Q4 25
$670.5M
Q3 25
$670.5M
Q2 25
$640.7M
Q1 25
$642.1M
Q4 24
$643.3M
Q3 24
$643.3M
Q2 24
$511.3M
Q1 24
$512.8M
Stockholders' Equity
UTL
UTL
WT
WT
Q4 25
$609.6M
$413.7M
Q3 25
$597.2M
$373.4M
Q2 25
$532.8M
$445.1M
Q1 25
$534.1M
$415.6M
Q4 24
$512.5M
$400.0M
Q3 24
$502.4M
$374.9M
Q2 24
$508.8M
$445.6M
Q1 24
$510.8M
$423.2M
Total Assets
UTL
UTL
WT
WT
Q4 25
$2.1B
$1.5B
Q3 25
$1.9B
$1.4B
Q2 25
$1.9B
$1.1B
Q1 25
$1.9B
$1.0B
Q4 24
$1.8B
$1.0B
Q3 24
$1.7B
$1.0B
Q2 24
$1.7B
$964.1M
Q1 24
$1.7B
$931.7M
Debt / Equity
UTL
UTL
WT
WT
Q4 25
1.10×
Q3 25
1.12×
Q2 25
1.20×
Q1 25
1.20×
Q4 24
1.26×
Q3 24
1.28×
Q2 24
1.00×
Q1 24
1.00×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
UTL
UTL
WT
WT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$21.4M
$147.9M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-36.3M
$147.7M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-22.5%
100.2%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
35.7%
0.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.13×
3.70×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-53.8M
$240.8M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
UTL
UTL
WT
WT
Q4 25
$21.4M
$147.9M
Q3 25
$15.6M
$48.1M
Q2 25
$42.2M
$38.8M
Q1 25
$52.1M
$6.4M
Q4 24
$23.3M
$113.5M
Q3 24
$26.1M
$47.7M
Q2 24
$49.9M
$32.2M
Q1 24
$26.6M
$-1.0M
Free Cash Flow
UTL
UTL
WT
WT
Q4 25
$-36.3M
$147.7M
Q3 25
$-39.0M
$48.0M
Q2 25
$2.0M
$38.7M
Q1 25
$19.5M
$6.3M
Q4 24
$-32.3M
$113.3M
Q3 24
$-31.3M
$47.7M
Q2 24
$13.2M
$32.2M
Q1 24
$6.4M
$-1.1M
FCF Margin
UTL
UTL
WT
WT
Q4 25
-22.5%
100.2%
Q3 25
-38.6%
38.2%
Q2 25
1.9%
34.4%
Q1 25
11.4%
5.9%
Q4 24
-25.3%
102.4%
Q3 24
-33.7%
42.1%
Q2 24
13.8%
30.1%
Q1 24
3.6%
-1.1%
Capex Intensity
UTL
UTL
WT
WT
Q4 25
35.7%
0.1%
Q3 25
54.0%
0.0%
Q2 25
39.2%
0.1%
Q1 25
19.1%
0.0%
Q4 24
43.6%
0.1%
Q3 24
61.8%
0.0%
Q2 24
38.3%
0.0%
Q1 24
11.3%
0.1%
Cash Conversion
UTL
UTL
WT
WT
Q4 25
1.13×
3.70×
Q3 25
2.44×
Q2 25
10.55×
1.57×
Q1 25
1.89×
0.26×
Q4 24
1.49×
4.15×
Q3 24
Q2 24
11.60×
1.48×
Q1 24
0.98×
-0.05×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

UTL
UTL

Segment breakdown not available.

WT
WT

Investment Advisory Management And Administrative Service$122.7M83%
Other Services Income$12.7M9%
IE$11.5M8%

Related Comparisons