vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK) and Vistra Corp. (VST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Vistra Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.8B vs $4.0B, roughly 1.2× Viking Holdings Ltd). Viking Holdings Ltd runs the higher net margin — 12.9% vs 4.8%, a 8.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings (NCLH) is a holding company that is based in the United States and domiciled in Bermuda. It operates three cruise lines as wholly owned subsidiaries: Norwegian Cruise Line, Oceania Cruises, and Regent Seven Seas Cruises. With its subsidiaries combined, it is the third-largest cruise operator in the world. It is a publicly traded company listed on the New York Stock Exchange.

Vistra may refer to either of two companies:Vistra, a corporate services company based in Hong Kong Vistra Corp, an energy company based in Texas

VIK vs VST — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
VST
VST
1.2× larger
VST
$4.8B
$4.0B
VIK
Higher net margin
VIK
VIK
8.1% more per $
VIK
12.9%
4.8%
VST

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
VIK
VIK
VST
VST
Revenue
$4.0B
$4.8B
Net Profit
$514.0M
$233.0M
Gross Margin
73.4%
Operating Margin
15.2%
9.9%
Net Margin
12.9%
4.8%
Revenue YoY
31.2%
Net Profit YoY
35.4%
-47.2%
EPS (diluted)
$1.15
$0.55

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
VIK
VIK
VST
VST
Q4 25
$4.8B
Q3 25
$4.0B
$4.8B
Q2 25
$2.3B
$3.8B
Q1 25
$718.2M
$4.3B
Q4 24
$3.7B
Q3 24
$3.6B
$4.3B
Q2 24
$2.1B
$3.6B
Q1 24
$3.2B
Net Profit
VIK
VIK
VST
VST
Q4 25
$233.0M
Q3 25
$514.0M
$652.0M
Q2 25
$439.2M
$327.0M
Q1 25
$-105.5M
$-268.0M
Q4 24
$441.0M
Q3 24
$379.7M
$1.9B
Q2 24
$159.8M
$365.0M
Q1 24
$-35.0M
Gross Margin
VIK
VIK
VST
VST
Q4 25
Q3 25
73.4%
Q2 25
55.7%
Q1 25
17.3%
Q4 24
Q3 24
74.7%
Q2 24
57.8%
Q1 24
Operating Margin
VIK
VIK
VST
VST
Q4 25
9.9%
Q3 25
15.2%
21.7%
Q2 25
23.7%
13.7%
Q1 25
-1.3%
-2.8%
Q4 24
16.4%
Q3 24
13.6%
59.6%
Q2 24
20.5%
22.5%
Q1 24
2.7%
Net Margin
VIK
VIK
VST
VST
Q4 25
4.8%
Q3 25
12.9%
13.6%
Q2 25
19.1%
8.7%
Q1 25
-14.7%
-6.3%
Q4 24
12.0%
Q3 24
10.6%
43.5%
Q2 24
7.7%
10.1%
Q1 24
-1.1%
EPS (diluted)
VIK
VIK
VST
VST
Q4 25
$0.55
Q3 25
$1.15
$1.75
Q2 25
$0.99
$0.81
Q1 25
$-0.24
$-0.93
Q4 24
$1.09
Q3 24
$0.87
$5.25
Q2 24
$0.38
$0.90
Q1 24
$-0.24

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
VIK
VIK
VST
VST
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$3.0B
$785.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$15.8B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$803.5M
$5.1B
Total Assets
$11.5B
$41.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
3.11×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
VIK
VIK
VST
VST
Q4 25
$785.0M
Q3 25
$3.0B
$602.0M
Q2 25
$2.6B
$458.0M
Q1 25
$2.8B
$561.0M
Q4 24
$1.2B
Q3 24
$2.4B
$905.0M
Q2 24
$1.8B
$1.6B
Q1 24
$1.1B
Total Debt
VIK
VIK
VST
VST
Q4 25
$15.8B
Q3 25
$15.8B
Q2 25
$15.5B
Q1 25
$15.4B
Q4 24
$15.4B
Q3 24
$13.9B
Q2 24
$13.9B
Q1 24
$14.7B
Stockholders' Equity
VIK
VIK
VST
VST
Q4 25
$5.1B
Q3 25
$803.5M
$5.2B
Q2 25
$278.3M
$4.8B
Q1 25
$-267.5M
$4.8B
Q4 24
$5.6B
Q3 24
$-688.9M
$5.4B
Q2 24
$-1.1B
$5.6B
Q1 24
$5.7B
Total Assets
VIK
VIK
VST
VST
Q4 25
$41.5B
Q3 25
$11.5B
$38.0B
Q2 25
$11.1B
$38.1B
Q1 25
$10.7B
$38.2B
Q4 24
$37.8B
Q3 24
$37.9B
Q2 24
$39.1B
Q1 24
$38.2B
Debt / Equity
VIK
VIK
VST
VST
Q4 25
3.11×
Q3 25
3.02×
Q2 25
3.22×
Q1 25
3.20×
Q4 24
2.77×
Q3 24
2.56×
Q2 24
2.49×
Q1 24
2.60×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
VIK
VIK
VST
VST
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$663.9M
$1.4B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$596.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
12.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
17.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.29×
6.15×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$1.3B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
VIK
VIK
VST
VST
Q4 25
$1.4B
Q3 25
$663.9M
$1.5B
Q2 25
$470.7M
$572.0M
Q1 25
$587.9M
$599.0M
Q4 24
$1.4B
Q3 24
$828.7M
$1.7B
Q2 24
$419.8M
$1.2B
Q1 24
$312.0M
Free Cash Flow
VIK
VIK
VST
VST
Q4 25
$596.0M
Q3 25
$1.0B
Q2 25
$-118.0M
Q1 25
$-169.0M
Q4 24
$923.0M
Q3 24
$1.0B
Q2 24
$698.0M
Q1 24
$-153.0M
FCF Margin
VIK
VIK
VST
VST
Q4 25
12.4%
Q3 25
21.1%
Q2 25
-3.1%
Q1 25
-4.0%
Q4 24
25.2%
Q3 24
23.4%
Q2 24
19.4%
Q1 24
-4.8%
Capex Intensity
VIK
VIK
VST
VST
Q4 25
17.4%
Q3 25
9.6%
Q2 25
18.4%
Q1 25
18.1%
Q4 24
11.7%
Q3 24
15.8%
Q2 24
13.8%
Q1 24
14.7%
Cash Conversion
VIK
VIK
VST
VST
Q4 25
6.15×
Q3 25
1.29×
2.25×
Q2 25
1.07×
1.75×
Q1 25
Q4 24
3.07×
Q3 24
2.18×
0.90×
Q2 24
2.63×
3.28×
Q1 24

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

VIK
VIK

Segment breakdown not available.

VST
VST

Retail Energy Charge In ERCOT$2.1B43%
Retail Energy Charge In Northeast Midwest$1.2B24%
East Segment$1.1B24%
Hedging Revenue Realized$170.0M4%
Revenue From Other Wholesale Contracts$116.0M2%
Transferable Production Tax Credit Revenues$78.0M2%
West Segment$77.0M2%
Intersegment Sales$25.0M1%

Related Comparisons