vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Voyager Technologies, Inc. (VOYG) and WEALTHFRONT CORP (WLTH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WEALTHFRONT CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($93.2M vs $35.2M, roughly 2.6× Voyager Technologies, Inc.). WEALTHFRONT CORP runs the higher net margin — 33.1% vs -130.4%, a 163.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Wealthfront Corporation is a financial services company based in Palo Alto, California, founded by Andy Rachleff and Dan Carroll in 2008. As of 2025, Wealthfront had $88 billion AUM across more than 1.3 million clients.
VOYG vs WLTH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $35.2M | $93.2M |
| Net Profit | $-45.9M | $30.9M |
| Gross Margin | -4.4% | 89.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 37.3% |
| Net Margin | -130.4% | 33.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.1% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -64.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.75 | $0.21 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $35.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $46.7M | $93.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | $-45.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-33.0M | $30.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-16.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-31.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | -4.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.4% | 89.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -60.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -52.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | -130.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -70.7% | 33.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -41.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -68.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | $-0.75 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.52 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.28 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.23 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $429.4M | $266.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $404.5M | $125.4M |
| Total Assets | $1.0B | $810.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $429.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $491.3M | $266.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $413.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $468.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | $404.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $125.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $590.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $554.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $810.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $727.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $685.3M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-39.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-66.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -189.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-263.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-39.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-60.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-30.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | $-66.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-54.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-53.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-88.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | -189.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -116.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -135.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -194.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 97.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 126.7% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
