vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Voyager Technologies, Inc. (VOYG) and YORK WATER CO (YORW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Voyager Technologies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($35.2M vs $19.4M, roughly 1.8× YORK WATER CO). YORK WATER CO runs the higher net margin — 26.7% vs -130.4%, a 157.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, YORK WATER CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs 2.1%).
The York Water Company is an investor-owned, public utility company based in York, Pennsylvania and operating throughout Pennsylvania. The company was founded in 1816 by a group of local businessmen concerned about fire protection.
VOYG vs YORW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $35.2M | $19.4M |
| Net Profit | $-45.9M | $5.2M |
| Gross Margin | -4.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 33.2% |
| Net Margin | -130.4% | 26.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.1% | 3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -64.5% | 0.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.75 | $0.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $35.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $46.7M | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.6M | $20.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.7M | $19.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $18.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $19.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $18.6M |
| Q1 26 | $-45.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-33.0M | $5.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-16.3M | $6.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-31.4M | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.0M |
| Q1 26 | -4.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 33.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -60.7% | 39.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -52.8% | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 34.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 35.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 37.9% |
| Q1 26 | -130.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -70.7% | 26.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -41.1% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -68.7% | 26.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 26.8% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.75 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.52 | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.28 | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.23 | $0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $429.4M | $1.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $404.5M | $240.3M |
| Total Assets | $1.0B | $680.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $429.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $491.3M | $1.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $413.3M | $1.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $468.9M | $1.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.0K |
| Q1 26 | $404.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $240.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $590.9M | $238.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $554.7M | $234.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $232.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $231.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $228.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $225.4M |
| Q1 26 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $680.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $727.8M | $667.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $685.3M | $653.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $641.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $633.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $621.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $610.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-39.7M | $8.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-66.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -189.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.63× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-263.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-39.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-60.9M | $8.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.1M | $7.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-30.9M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.7M |
| Q1 26 | $-66.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-54.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-53.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-88.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | -189.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -116.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -135.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -194.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 97.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 126.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.50× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.34× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
