vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Vistra Corp. (VST) and W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Vistra Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.8B vs $3.7B, roughly 1.3× W. R. Berkley Corporation). W. R. Berkley Corporation runs the higher net margin — 14.0% vs 4.8%, a 9.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vistra Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (31.2% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Vistra Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (23.3% CAGR vs 5.5%).

Vistra may refer to either of two companies:Vistra, a corporate services company based in Hong Kong Vistra Corp, an energy company based in Texas

William Robert Berkley is the founder and current chairman of W. R. Berkley Corporation and the chairman of the New York University Board of Trustees.

VST vs WRB — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
VST
VST
1.3× larger
VST
$4.8B
$3.7B
WRB
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
VST
VST
+27.2% gap
VST
31.2%
4.0%
WRB
Higher net margin
WRB
WRB
9.1% more per $
WRB
14.0%
4.8%
VST
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
VST
VST
Annualised
VST
23.3%
5.5%
WRB

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
VST
VST
WRB
WRB
Revenue
$4.8B
$3.7B
Net Profit
$233.0M
$515.2M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
9.9%
Net Margin
4.8%
14.0%
Revenue YoY
31.2%
4.0%
Net Profit YoY
-47.2%
23.4%
EPS (diluted)
$0.55
$1.31

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
VST
VST
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
$3.7B
Q4 25
$4.8B
$3.7B
Q3 25
$4.8B
$3.8B
Q2 25
$3.8B
$3.7B
Q1 25
$4.3B
$3.5B
Q4 24
$3.7B
$3.7B
Q3 24
$4.3B
$3.4B
Q2 24
$3.6B
$3.3B
Net Profit
VST
VST
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
$515.2M
Q4 25
$233.0M
$449.5M
Q3 25
$652.0M
$511.0M
Q2 25
$327.0M
$401.3M
Q1 25
$-268.0M
$417.6M
Q4 24
$441.0M
$576.1M
Q3 24
$1.9B
$365.6M
Q2 24
$365.0M
$371.9M
Operating Margin
VST
VST
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
Q4 25
9.9%
15.4%
Q3 25
21.7%
17.2%
Q2 25
13.7%
14.2%
Q1 25
-2.8%
15.2%
Q4 24
16.4%
19.9%
Q3 24
59.6%
14.0%
Q2 24
22.5%
14.7%
Net Margin
VST
VST
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
14.0%
Q4 25
4.8%
12.1%
Q3 25
13.6%
13.6%
Q2 25
8.7%
10.9%
Q1 25
-6.3%
11.8%
Q4 24
12.0%
15.7%
Q3 24
43.5%
10.8%
Q2 24
10.1%
11.2%
EPS (diluted)
VST
VST
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
$1.31
Q4 25
$0.55
$1.13
Q3 25
$1.75
$1.28
Q2 25
$0.81
$1.00
Q1 25
$-0.93
$1.04
Q4 24
$1.09
$0.89
Q3 24
$5.25
$0.91
Q2 24
$0.90
$0.92

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
VST
VST
WRB
WRB
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$785.0M
$2.1B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$15.8B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$5.1B
Total Assets
$41.5B
$44.3B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
3.11×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
VST
VST
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
$2.1B
Q4 25
$785.0M
$2.5B
Q3 25
$602.0M
$2.4B
Q2 25
$458.0M
$2.0B
Q1 25
$561.0M
$1.7B
Q4 24
$1.2B
$2.0B
Q3 24
$905.0M
$1.6B
Q2 24
$1.6B
$1.6B
Total Debt
VST
VST
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$15.8B
Q3 25
$15.8B
Q2 25
$15.5B
Q1 25
$15.4B
Q4 24
$15.4B
Q3 24
$13.9B
Q2 24
$13.9B
Stockholders' Equity
VST
VST
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$5.1B
$9.7B
Q3 25
$5.2B
$9.8B
Q2 25
$4.8B
$9.3B
Q1 25
$4.8B
$8.9B
Q4 24
$5.6B
$8.4B
Q3 24
$5.4B
$8.4B
Q2 24
$5.6B
$7.8B
Total Assets
VST
VST
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
$44.3B
Q4 25
$41.5B
$44.1B
Q3 25
$38.0B
$43.7B
Q2 25
$38.1B
$42.7B
Q1 25
$38.2B
$41.3B
Q4 24
$37.8B
$40.6B
Q3 24
$37.9B
$40.4B
Q2 24
$39.1B
$38.9B
Debt / Equity
VST
VST
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
Q4 25
3.11×
Q3 25
3.02×
Q2 25
3.22×
Q1 25
3.20×
Q4 24
2.77×
Q3 24
2.56×
Q2 24
2.49×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
VST
VST
WRB
WRB
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$1.4B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$596.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
12.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
17.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
6.15×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$1.3B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
VST
VST
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$1.4B
$995.1M
Q3 25
$1.5B
$1.1B
Q2 25
$572.0M
$703.8M
Q1 25
$599.0M
$743.8M
Q4 24
$1.4B
$810.0M
Q3 24
$1.7B
$1.2B
Q2 24
$1.2B
$881.3M
Free Cash Flow
VST
VST
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$596.0M
Q3 25
$1.0B
Q2 25
$-118.0M
Q1 25
$-169.0M
Q4 24
$923.0M
Q3 24
$1.0B
Q2 24
$698.0M
FCF Margin
VST
VST
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
Q4 25
12.4%
Q3 25
21.1%
Q2 25
-3.1%
Q1 25
-4.0%
Q4 24
25.2%
Q3 24
23.4%
Q2 24
19.4%
Capex Intensity
VST
VST
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
Q4 25
17.4%
Q3 25
9.6%
Q2 25
18.4%
Q1 25
18.1%
Q4 24
11.7%
Q3 24
15.8%
Q2 24
13.8%
Cash Conversion
VST
VST
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
Q4 25
6.15×
2.21×
Q3 25
2.25×
2.23×
Q2 25
1.75×
1.75×
Q1 25
1.78×
Q4 24
3.07×
1.41×
Q3 24
0.90×
3.39×
Q2 24
3.28×
2.37×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

VST
VST

Retail Energy Charge In ERCOT$2.1B43%
Retail Energy Charge In Northeast Midwest$1.2B24%
East Segment$1.1B24%
Hedging Revenue Realized$170.0M4%
Revenue From Other Wholesale Contracts$116.0M2%
Transferable Production Tax Credit Revenues$78.0M2%
West Segment$77.0M2%
Intersegment Sales$25.0M1%

WRB
WRB

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons