vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Vistra Corp. (VST) and Yum! Brands (YUM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Vistra Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.8B vs $2.1B, roughly 2.3× Yum! Brands). Yum! Brands runs the higher net margin — 21.0% vs 4.8%, a 16.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vistra Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (31.2% vs 15.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Vistra Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (23.3% CAGR vs 8.1%).
Vistra may refer to either of two companies:Vistra, a corporate services company based in Hong Kong Vistra Corp, an energy company based in Texas
Yum! Brands, Inc. is an American multinational fast food corporation. It was formed in 1977 as a subsidiary of PepsiCo, after the company acquired KFC, Pizza Hut, and Taco Bell. PepsiCo divested the brands in 1997, and these consolidated as Yum!. The company operates KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, Habit Burger & Grill, and several technology companies.
VST vs YUM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.8B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $233.0M | $432.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.9% | 31.3% |
| Net Margin | 4.8% | 21.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 31.2% | 15.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -47.2% | 70.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.55 | $1.55 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.8B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $432.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $233.0M | $535.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $652.0M | $397.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $327.0M | $374.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-268.0M | $253.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $441.0M | $423.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $382.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $365.0M | $367.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 67.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 70.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 71.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 70.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 71.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 73.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 31.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 29.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.7% | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.7% | 32.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.8% | 30.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 27.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.6% | 33.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.5% | 34.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | 21.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.6% | 20.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | 19.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.3% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.0% | 17.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.5% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | 20.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.55 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.55 | $1.91 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.75 | $1.41 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.81 | $1.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.93 | $0.90 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.09 | $1.49 | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.25 | $1.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.90 | $1.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $785.0M | $689.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $15.8B | $12.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.1B | — |
| Total Assets | $41.5B | $8.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.11× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $689.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $785.0M | $709.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $602.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $458.0M | $677.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $561.0M | $607.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $707.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $905.0M | $548.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $520.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $12.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.8B | $11.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.8B | $11.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.5B | $10.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.4B | $11.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4B | $11.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.9B | $11.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.9B | $11.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $-7.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2B | $-7.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $-7.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $-7.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.6B | $-7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4B | $-7.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6B | $-7.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $41.5B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.0B | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.1B | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.2B | $6.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.8B | $6.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.9B | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.1B | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.11× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.02× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.22× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.20× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.77× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.56× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.49× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.4B | $416.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $596.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 12.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 17.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.15× | 0.96× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.3B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $416.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $617.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $543.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $572.0M | $446.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $599.0M | $404.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $513.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $471.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $342.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $596.0M | $482.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $449.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-118.0M | $375.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-169.0M | $333.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $923.0M | $407.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $419.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $698.0M | $292.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.4% | 19.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.1% | 22.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.1% | 19.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.0% | 18.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.2% | 17.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.4% | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 16.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.4% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.6% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.4% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.8% | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.96× | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.15× | 1.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.25× | 1.37× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.75× | 1.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.07× | 1.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.90× | 1.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.28× | 0.93× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
VST
| Retail Energy Charge In ERCOT | $2.1B | 43% |
| Retail Energy Charge In Northeast Midwest | $1.2B | 24% |
| East Segment | $1.1B | 24% |
| Hedging Revenue Realized | $170.0M | 4% |
| Revenue From Other Wholesale Contracts | $116.0M | 2% |
| Transferable Production Tax Credit Revenues | $78.0M | 2% |
| West Segment | $77.0M | 2% |
| Intersegment Sales | $25.0M | 1% |
YUM
| Franchise and property revenues | $856.0M | 42% |
| Company sales | $785.0M | 38% |
| Franchise contributions for advertising and other services | $418.0M | 20% |
