vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LQR House Inc. (YHC) and ATIF Holdings Ltd (ZBAI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LQR House Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($299.7K vs $250.0K, roughly 1.2× ATIF Holdings Ltd). ATIF Holdings Ltd runs the higher net margin — -635.6% vs -1368.7%, a 733.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ATIF Holdings Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.0% vs -64.2%). Over the past eight quarters, ATIF Holdings Ltd's revenue compounded faster (-8.7% CAGR vs -21.1%).
LQR House Inc. is a US-based alcohol beverage e-commerce and distribution company. It offers a broad portfolio of spirits, wine, and beer, operating two core segments: direct-to-consumer retail for individuals and wholesale distribution for business clients across the United States.
ATIF Holdings Ltd is a professional business advisory service provider that mainly serves small and medium-sized enterprises across the Asia-Pacific region. It offers corporate strategic consulting, fundraising guidance, cross-border expansion support, and industry resource matching services for clients in technology, consumer goods, manufacturing and other key sectors.
YHC vs ZBAI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $299.7K | $250.0K |
| Net Profit | $-4.1M | $-1.6M |
| Gross Margin | 17.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -1000.3% | -75.6% |
| Net Margin | -1368.7% | -635.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -64.2% | 25.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 72.2% | -96.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.94 | $-0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $299.7K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $337.3K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $498.5K | $250.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $429.3K | $200.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $838.2K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $624.5K | $270.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $557.9K | $200.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $481.1K | $25.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-4.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-16.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.4M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-14.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.2M | $-807.6K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.4M | $-407.6K |
| Q4 25 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -9.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -27.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | -1000.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1134.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -442.1% | -75.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -559.0% | -175.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1221.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -561.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -407.7% | -260.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -513.9% | -2190.1% |
| Q4 25 | -1368.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -4989.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -441.8% | -635.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -556.6% | -951.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1760.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -538.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -396.0% | -403.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -504.6% | -1630.6% |
| Q4 25 | $2.94 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.50 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.10 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.85 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-88.71 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-21.84 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.49 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-18.29 | $-0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $7.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $29.3M | $8.4M |
| Total Assets | $31.2M | $8.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7M | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.6M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0M | $139.2K |
| Q4 25 | $29.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2M | $8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3M | $7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-518.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.7M | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.4M | $506.3K |
| Q4 25 | $31.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.4M | $8.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6M | $8.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.8M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.2M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.9M | $2.5M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-14.3M | $-939.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-14.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.6M | $-939.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.6M | $-395.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.2M | $-62.6K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.4M | $-212.8K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.4M | $-213.5K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -287.7% | -854.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.1% | 3.0% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
