vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AbCellera Biologics Inc. (ABCL) and QIAGEN N.V. (QGEN), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AbCellera Biologics Inc. is a Vancouver, British Columbia-based biotechnology company that discovers and develops antibody therapeutics. The company is best known for its leading role in the Pandemic Prevention Platform, a project of DARPA's Biological Technologies Office. AbCellera utilizes a proprietary technology platform, which they claim can develop "medical countermeasures within 60 days." Its platform for single-cell screening was initially developed at the University of British Columbia.
QIAGEN N.V. is a German-founded multinational provider of sample and assay technologies for molecular diagnostics, applied testing, academic research, and pharmaceutical research. The company operates in more than 35 offices in over 25 countries. QIAGEN N.V., the global corporate headquarter of the QIAGEN group, is located in Venlo, The Netherlands. The main operative headquarters are located in Hilden, Germany. European, American, Chinese, and Asian-Pacific regional headquarters are located ...
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $44.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-8.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-57.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-34.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-45.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-34.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-51.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-36.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-40.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | -63.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -851.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -290.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1479.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1441.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1439.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1276.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -551.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | -19.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -637.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -203.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1077.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -677.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -785.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -504.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -408.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.19 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.12 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.15 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.17 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
