vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Arch Capital Group (ACGL) and Business First Bancshares, Inc. (BFST), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Arch Capital Group is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.9B vs $2.6M, roughly 1864.7× Business First Bancshares, Inc.). On growth, Arch Capital Group posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.5% vs -8.1%). Arch Capital Group produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.4B vs $15.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Arch Capital Group's revenue compounded faster (11.9% CAGR vs 4.2%).
Arch Capital Group Ltd. is a Bermuda exempted public company which writes insurance, reinsurance and mortgage insurance on a worldwide basis, with a focus on specialty lines, the segment of the insurance industry where the more difficult and unusual risks are written. The company is headquartered in Bermuda and operates globally in 60 offices in North America, Europe, Asia and Australia.
First Citizens Bancshares, Inc. is a bank holding company based in Raleigh, North Carolina and one of the largest banks in the United States. Its primary subsidiary is First Citizens Bank, which operates over 500 branches in 23 states. A second subsidiary is Silicon Valley Bank, which operates 39 offices in 15 states.
ACGL vs BFST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.9B | $2.6M |
| Net Profit | $1.2B | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | 25.1% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 8.5% | -8.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 32.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.33 | $0.71 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1B | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.7B | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9B | $2.4M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $22.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $22.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $574.0M | $20.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $935.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $988.0M | $17.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $17.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $13.6M |
| Q4 25 | 25.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.4% | 891.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.7% | 839.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | 718.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.9% | 655.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.0% | 678.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.4% | 556.4% |
| Q4 25 | $3.33 | $0.71 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.56 | $0.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.23 | $0.70 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.48 | $0.65 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.41 | $0.51 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.56 | $0.65 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.30 | $0.62 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.92 | $0.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $993.0M | $411.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $24.2B | $896.9M |
| Total Assets | $79.2B | $8.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $993.0M | $411.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $399.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $983.0M | $495.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $312.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $979.0M | $319.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $213.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $208.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $993.0M | $185.9M |
| Q4 25 | $24.2B | $896.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7B | $878.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.0B | $848.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.5B | $826.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.8B | $799.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.3B | $699.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.7B | $664.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.4B | $649.0M |
| Q4 25 | $79.2B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.2B | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.8B | $7.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $75.2B | $7.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.9B | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $73.7B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.5B | $6.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $62.8B | $6.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.4B | $16.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.4B | $15.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 28.2% | 580.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 0.2% | 58.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 1.13× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.1B | $88.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $16.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $32.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $14.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $28.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $17.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $21.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $15.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $7.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $15.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $32.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $27.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $17.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $14.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $7.2M |
| Q4 25 | 28.2% | 580.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.6% | 1250.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.3% | 524.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.0% | 967.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.3% | 592.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.5% | 771.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.6% | 552.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.3% | 295.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 58.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 41.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | 15.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.13× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.62× | 1.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.91× | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.54× | 1.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.68× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.04× | 1.20× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.20× | 0.88× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.40× | 0.56× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
