vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Air Products (APD), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Air Products is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.1B vs $1.4B, roughly 2.2× Albemarle Corporation). Air Products runs the higher net margin — -29.0% vs 21.9%, a 50.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Albemarle Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs 5.8%). Albemarle Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.1M vs $-350.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Air Products's revenue compounded faster (2.9% CAGR vs 2.4%).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. provides atmospheric gases, process and specialty gases, equipment, and services worldwide. The company produces atmospheric gases, including oxygen, nitrogen, and argon; process gases, such as hydrogen, helium, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, syngas; specialty gases; and equipment for the production or processing of gases comprising air separation units and non-cryogenic generators for customers in various industries, including refining, chemical, gasificati...
ALB vs APD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q1 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $3.1B |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $678.2M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | 32.1% |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | 23.7% |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | 21.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | 5.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | 9.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | $3.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $2.9B |
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | $678.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $713.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $-1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $617.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $696.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $572.4M |
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 32.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 32.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | 29.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 31.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | 34.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | 32.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 32.0% |
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 26.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | -79.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 22.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | 76.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.2% | 21.7% |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 21.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 23.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | -59.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 21.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | 61.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | 23.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 19.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | $3.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $3.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $-7.77 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $2.77 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | $8.75 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $3.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $2.57 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | $15.4B |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | $41.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | $15.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $15.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $15.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $14.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $16.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $17.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $15.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.5B | $14.9B |
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $41.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $41.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $41.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $38.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | $40.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $39.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | $37.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0B | $35.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | $900.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | $-350.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | -11.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 10.9% | 40.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | 1.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | $900.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $855.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $328.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $811.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.0M | $801.7M |
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | $-350.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | $-640.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | $-1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | $-1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | $-345.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-481.4M | $-867.7M |
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | -11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | -21.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | -53.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | -44.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | -11.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.4% | -29.6% |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 40.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 47.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 49.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 64.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 72.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 65.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | 53.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.6% | 57.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | 1.20× | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | 1.31× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.01× | 1.40× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
APD
| Other | $1.6B | 53% |
| Onsite | $783.9M | 25% |
| Merchant | $557.8M | 18% |
| Saleof Equipment | $117.0M | 4% |
