vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ASML HOLDING NV (ASML) and GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ASML Holding N.V. is a Dutch multinational corporation and semiconductor company that specializes in the development and manufacturing of photolithography machines which are used to produce integrated circuits. It is the largest supplier for the semiconductor industry, as well as the most advanced producer of extreme ultraviolet photolithography (EUV) machines that are required to manufacture the most advanced chips. As of January 2026, its market capitalization was approximately $527 billion...
GlobalFoundries Inc. is a multinational semiconductor contract manufacturing and design company domiciled in the Cayman Islands and headquartered in Malta, New York. Created by the divestiture of the manufacturing arm of AMD in March 2009, the company was privately owned by Mubadala Investment Company, a sovereign wealth fund of the United Arab Emirates, until an initial public offering (IPO) in October 2021. Mubadala remains the majority owner of the company with an 82% stake.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $1.8B |
| Q3 25 | — | $249.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $228.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $211.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $178.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $155.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $249.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $237.0M |
| Q3 25 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 25.4% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 28.8% |
| Q3 25 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 14.9% |
| Q3 25 | — | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 12.8% |
| Q3 25 | — | $0.44 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.28 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $0.45 | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $0.43 |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
