vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (ASTI) and TIGO ENERGY, INC. (TYGO), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TIGO ENERGY, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($30.6M vs $15.6K, roughly 1957.5× Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.). TIGO ENERGY, INC. runs the higher net margin — -13245.2% vs -7.1%, a 13238.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (67.1% CAGR vs -95.8%).
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. is a publicly traded photovoltaic (PV) company located in Thornton, Colorado. Its primary product is a flexible CIGS solar cell on a plastic substrate.
Tigo Energy is an American private corporation, headquartered in Los Gatos, California, United States. It provides products, technologies, software, and services to installers, distributors, and original equipment manufacturers within the photovoltaic industry. It specializes in module-level power optimizers and smart module power electronics.
ASTI vs TYGO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.6K | $30.6M |
| Net Profit | $-2.1M | $-2.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 42.7% |
| Operating Margin | -13243.9% | 2.1% |
| Net Margin | -13245.2% | -7.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 115.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -42.3% | 83.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.17 | $-0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $15.6K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.5K | $30.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.0K | $24.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.6K | $18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6K | $14.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.7K | $12.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6K | $9.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.0M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.1M | $-4.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.7M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.5M | $-11.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 38.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.2% |
| Q4 25 | -13243.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -6892.3% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12316.8% | -6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11177.9% | -21.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -26443.2% | -73.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8490.7% | -66.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -44206.0% | -92.7% |
| Q4 25 | -13245.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -7081.3% | -7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12177.3% | -18.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10716.2% | -37.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -19776.2% | -92.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12420.5% | -89.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -45316.8% | -117.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.17 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.62 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.17 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.13 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.75 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.37 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.76 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-53.00 | $-0.19 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.8M | $40.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $50.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.3M | $12.1M |
| Total Assets | $6.3M | $107.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 4.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1M | $40.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0M | $28.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $20.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7M | $19.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.8M | $20.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $187.5K | $21.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $50.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $50.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $50.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $50.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $50.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $50.0M |
| Q4 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7M | $12.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4M | $1.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6M | $3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.3M | $33.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2M | $44.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.6M | $54.3M |
| Q4 25 | $6.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8M | $107.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.8M | $80.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.2M | $70.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $98.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2M | $103.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.0M | $109.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 29.55× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.25× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.92× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.8M | $1.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 4.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | — | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.8M | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | $-530.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.1M | $-535.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.6M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.2M | $-11.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.8M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-874.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-11.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -6182.5% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10692.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -9923.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -6.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -13.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -118.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 103.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.7% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
