vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BED BATH & BEYOND, INC. (BBBY) and DICK'S SPORTING GOODS, INC. (DKS), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DICK'S SPORTING GOODS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.2B vs $273.4M, roughly 15.2× BED BATH & BEYOND, INC.). DICK'S SPORTING GOODS, INC. runs the higher net margin — -7.6% vs 1.8%, a 9.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DICK'S SPORTING GOODS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (36.3% vs -9.8%). BED BATH & BEYOND, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-8.6M vs $-515.6M). Over the past eight quarters, DICK'S SPORTING GOODS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (3.7% CAGR vs -15.4%).
Bed Bath & Beyond was an American big-box retail chain specializing in housewares, furniture, and specialty items. Headquartered in Union, New Jersey, the chain operated stores in the United States and Canada, and was once counted among the Fortune 500 and the Forbes Global 2000. The chain filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in April 2023 and liquidated all of its remaining stores, with the last closing on July 30, 2023. Following the retail chain's liquidation, its name was adopted by online ret...
Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc. is an American chain of sporting goods stores founded in 1948 by Richard "Dick" Stack. It is the largest sporting goods retailer in the United States and is listed on the Fortune 500.
BBBY vs DKS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $273.4M | $4.2B |
| Net Profit | $-20.9M | $75.2M |
| Gross Margin | 24.6% | 33.1% |
| Operating Margin | -4.8% | 2.2% |
| Net Margin | -7.6% | 1.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.8% | 36.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 74.3% | -67.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.26 | $0.86 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $273.4M | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $257.2M | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $282.3M | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $231.7M | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.2M | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $311.4M | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $398.1M | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $382.3M | $3.9B |
| Q4 25 | $-20.9M | $75.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.5M | $381.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.3M | $264.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-39.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-81.3M | $227.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-61.0M | $362.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-42.6M | $275.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-73.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 24.6% | 33.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.3% | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.7% | 36.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.1% | 35.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.0% | 35.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.2% | 36.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.1% | 36.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.5% | 34.4% |
| Q4 25 | -4.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.8% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.4% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.0% | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.3% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.5% | 13.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.8% | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -15.0% | 9.6% |
| Q4 25 | -7.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.8% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.8% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -26.8% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.6% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.7% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -19.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.26 | $0.86 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $4.71 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.34 | $3.24 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.74 | $3.63 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.68 | $2.75 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.33 | $4.37 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.93 | $3.30 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.62 | $3.57 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $175.3M | $821.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $217.6M | $5.5B |
| Total Assets | $425.5M | $17.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $175.3M | $821.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $167.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.6M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $114.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $140.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $256.3M | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $217.6M | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $202.6M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $130.9M | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $143.4M | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.7M | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $196.2M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $250.4M | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $287.7M | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | $425.5M | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $414.4M | $10.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $358.1M | $10.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $363.7M | $10.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $402.0M | $10.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $428.3M | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $496.8M | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $577.3M | $9.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-6.5M | $-248.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.6M | $-515.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.2% | -12.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 0.8% | 6.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | -3.30× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-64.1M | $88.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $-6.5M | $-248.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.1M | $557.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.8M | $178.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-50.9M | $631.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.7M | $54.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-42.1M | $394.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-75.9M | $231.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-34.6M | $762.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.6M | $-515.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-17.4M | $296.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.0M | $-86.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-52.1M | $394.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-24.7M | $-139.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-45.5M | $179.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-80.4M | $74.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-38.0M | $584.7M |
| Q4 25 | -3.2% | -12.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.8% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | -2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -22.5% | 10.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.1% | -4.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.6% | 5.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -20.2% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.9% | 15.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 4.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -3.30× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.84× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
