vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BYLINE BANCORP, INC. (BY) and PROVIDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES INC (PFS), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BYLINE BANCORP, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($101.3M vs $18.2M, roughly 5.6× PROVIDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES INC). On growth, BYLINE BANCORP, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.4% vs 10.4%). PROVIDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($64.1M vs $58.1M). Over the past eight quarters, BYLINE BANCORP, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (8.8% CAGR vs 5.8%).
Byline Bank is a bank headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, United States. It is the primary subsidiary of Byline Bancorp, Inc., a bank holding company, and the 4th largest SBA 7(a) lender.
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. is an American bank holding company and financial services corporation based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Its banking subsidiary, PNC Bank, operates in 27 states and the District of Columbia, with 2,629 branches and 9,523 ATMs. PNC Bank is one of the largest banks in the US by assets and by number of branches, deposits, and ATMs.
BY vs PFS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $101.3M | $18.2M |
| Net Profit | $34.5M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 46.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 34.1% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 14.4% | 10.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 13.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.77 | $0.64 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $101.3M | $18.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.9M | $17.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $96.0M | $18.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.2M | $18.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $88.5M | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.5M | $17.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $86.5M | $17.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $85.5M | $16.3M |
| Q4 25 | $34.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.2M | $71.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.1M | $72.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.2M | $64.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.3M | $46.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.7M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.4M | $32.1M |
| Q4 25 | 46.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.4% | -120.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.2% | 404.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 393.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.0% | 339.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.7% | 260.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.3% | -65.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.6% | 197.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.77 | $0.64 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.82 | $0.55 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.66 | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.64 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.68 | $0.37 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.69 | $0.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.68 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.70 | $0.43 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $149.1M | $209.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3B | $2.8B |
| Total Assets | $9.7B | $25.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $149.1M | $209.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | $299.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $218.3M | $258.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $421.3M | $234.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $563.1M | $205.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.6M | $244.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $730.5M | $290.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $636.8M | $158.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $9.7B | $25.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $24.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7B | $24.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | $24.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.5B | $24.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.4B | $24.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6B | $24.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.4B | $14.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $58.6M | $68.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $58.1M | $64.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 57.4% | 351.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 0.5% | 26.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 1.70× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $136.3M | $430.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $58.6M | $68.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.3M | $98.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.3M | $186.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.1M | $88.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $52.9M | $239.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.8M | $69.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.1M | $76.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $62.3M | $41.4M |
| Q4 25 | $58.1M | $64.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.0M | $96.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2M | $182.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.0M | $87.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.8M | $237.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.1M | $67.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.4M | $75.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.8M | $40.9M |
| Q4 25 | 57.4% | 351.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.0% | 545.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.8% | 998.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.4% | 463.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 57.4% | 1439.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.9% | 380.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.6% | 428.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 72.3% | 251.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 26.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 23.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.70× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.03× | 1.37× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.54× | 2.59× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.96× | 1.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.74× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.65× | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.05× | 1.29× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BY
Segment breakdown not available.
PFS
| Wealth Management Fees | $7.6M | 42% |
| Deposit Account | $5.3M | 29% |
| Insurance Commissions And Fees | $3.9M | 21% |
| Debit Card | $1.4M | 8% |
