vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORP (CACC) and OLD NATIONAL BANCORP /IN/ (ONB), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OLD NATIONAL BANCORP /IN/ is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($580.8M vs $579.9M, roughly 1.0× CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORP). OLD NATIONAL BANCORP /IN/ runs the higher net margin — 21.0% vs 37.3%, a 16.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OLD NATIONAL BANCORP /IN/ posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (47.4% vs 2.5%). CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($268.9M vs $137.3M). Over the past eight quarters, OLD NATIONAL BANCORP /IN/'s revenue compounded faster (27.7% CAGR vs 6.8%).
Credit Acceptance Corporation is an auto finance company providing automobile loans and other related financial products. The company operates its financial program through a national network of dealer-partners, the automobile dealers participating in the programs. The company operates two programs: the "Portfolio Program" and the "Purchase Program". Through these programs, the company can advance money to automobile dealers in exchange for the right to service the underlying consumer loans a...
Old National Bank is an American regional bank with nearly 200 retail branches operated by Old National Bancorp and based in Chicago and Evansville, Indiana. With assets at $48.5 billion and 250 banking centers, Old National Bancorp is the largest financial services bank holding company headquartered in Indiana and one of the top 30 banking companies in the U.S. Old National Bank has locations in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Tennessee, and Wisconsin.
CACC vs ONB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $579.9M | $580.8M |
| Net Profit | $122.0M | $216.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 27.1% | 46.7% |
| Net Margin | 21.0% | 37.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.5% | 47.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -19.7% | 40.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $10.87 | $0.55 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $579.9M | $580.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $582.4M | $574.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $583.8M | $514.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $571.1M | $387.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $565.9M | $394.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $550.3M | $391.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $538.2M | $388.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $508.0M | $356.5M |
| Q4 25 | $122.0M | $216.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.2M | $182.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.4M | $125.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $106.3M | $144.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.9M | $153.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.8M | $143.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-47.1M | $121.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $64.3M | $120.3M |
| Q4 25 | 27.1% | 46.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.6% | 40.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | 30.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 46.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.9% | 47.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.4% | 47.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.3% | 40.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.0% | 42.9% |
| Q4 25 | 21.0% | 37.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.6% | 31.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | 24.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.6% | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.8% | 39.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.3% | 36.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.8% | 31.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.7% | 33.7% |
| Q4 25 | $10.87 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.43 | $0.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.42 | $0.34 | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.66 | $0.44 | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.28 | $0.47 | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.35 | $0.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.83 | $0.37 | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.08 | $0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $22.8M | $1.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $8.5B |
| Total Assets | $8.6B | $72.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $22.8M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $528.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $343.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $159.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.4M | $939.5M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $8.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $8.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $6.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $6.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $5.6B |
| Q4 25 | $8.6B | $72.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.6B | $71.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.7B | $71.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3B | $53.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.9B | $53.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.7B | $53.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.3B | $53.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.1B | $49.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $269.3M | $159.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $268.9M | $137.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 46.4% | 23.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 0.1% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 2.21× | 0.73× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.1B | $637.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $269.3M | $159.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $299.4M | $341.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $139.7M | $72.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $346.2M | $108.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $306.2M | $235.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $317.7M | $121.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $204.0M | $161.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $310.0M | $104.2M |
| Q4 25 | $268.9M | $137.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $298.8M | $333.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $139.4M | $64.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $345.9M | $102.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $305.5M | $229.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $317.3M | $115.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $203.6M | $151.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $309.7M | $95.8M |
| Q4 25 | 46.4% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.3% | 58.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.9% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.6% | 26.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 54.0% | 58.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 57.7% | 29.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.8% | 39.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 61.0% | 26.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 2.4% |
| Q4 25 | 2.21× | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.77× | 1.87× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.60× | 0.58× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.26× | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.02× | 1.53× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.03× | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.82× | 0.87× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
