vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CROWN HOLDINGS, INC. (CCK) and Tyson Foods (TSN), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tyson Foods is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.3B vs $3.1B, roughly 4.6× CROWN HOLDINGS, INC.). CROWN HOLDINGS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 4.8% vs 0.6%, a 4.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CROWN HOLDINGS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.7% vs 5.1%). Tyson Foods produced more free cash flow last quarter ($690.0M vs $255.0M). Over the past eight quarters, CROWN HOLDINGS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (6.0% CAGR vs 4.6%).
Danish Crown is an internationally oriented Danish food company with butchery operations, processing and sales of primarily pork and beef. Through a number of subsidiaries, the group is widely represented within the food industry with various food products. The CEO is Niels Duedahl and the headquarters are located in Randers.
Tyson Foods, Inc. is an American multinational corporation based in Springdale, Arkansas that operates in the food industry. The company is the world's second-largest processor and marketer of chicken, beef, and pork after JBS S.A. It is the largest meat company in America. It annually exports the largest percentage of beef out of the United States. Together with its subsidiaries, it operates major food brands, including Tyson, Jimmy Dean, Hillshire Farm, Ball Park, Wright Brand, Aidells, and...
CCK vs TSN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q1 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.1B | $14.3B |
| Net Profit | $150.0M | $85.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 5.6% |
| Operating Margin | 12.0% | 2.1% |
| Net Margin | 4.8% | 0.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.7% | 5.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -58.1% | -76.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.32 | $0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $14.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $13.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $13.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | $13.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $13.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $13.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8B | $13.1B |
| Q4 25 | $150.0M | $85.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $214.0M | $47.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $181.0M | $61.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $193.0M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $358.0M | $359.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-175.0M | $357.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $174.0M | $191.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $67.0M | $145.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.6% |
| Q4 25 | 12.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.1% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.5% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.8% | 2.4% |
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.3% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.7% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.7% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.4% | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | $1.32 | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.85 | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.56 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.65 | $0.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.01 | $1.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.47 | $1.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.45 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.56 | $0.41 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $764.0M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.9B | $7.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.0B | $18.0B |
| Total Assets | $14.3B | $36.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.96× | 0.41× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $764.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $936.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $779.0M | $992.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $918.0M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | $5.9B | $7.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | $7.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3B | $8.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.2B | $8.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1B | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4B | $9.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.4B | $9.6B |
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $18.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $18.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $18.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $18.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $18.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $18.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5B | $18.1B |
| Q4 25 | $14.3B | $36.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.6B | $36.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.5B | $36.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.8B | $36.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.8B | $37.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1B | $37.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.9B | $37.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.7B | $37.5B |
| Q4 25 | 1.96× | 0.41× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.07× | 0.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.18× | 0.45× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.31× | 0.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.23× | 0.52× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.93× | 0.53× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.92× | 0.54× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.98× | 0.53× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $487.0M | $942.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $255.0M | $690.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.2% | 4.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 7.4% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 3.25× | 11.08× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.1B | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $487.0M | $942.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $580.0M | $535.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $449.0M | $774.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0M | $-185.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $295.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $554.0M | $617.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $445.0M | $796.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-102.0M | $-123.0M |
| Q4 25 | $255.0M | $690.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $488.0M | $248.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $393.0M | $547.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-19.0M | $-378.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $146.0M | $760.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $478.0M | $369.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $361.0M | $533.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-196.0M | $-390.0M |
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.7% | -2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.9% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.0% | -3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 7.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | 2.0% |
| Q4 25 | 3.25× | 11.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.71× | 11.38× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.48× | 12.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.07× | -26.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.82× | 2.87× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.56× | 4.17× | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.52× | -0.85× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CCK
| Transferred Over Time | $1.8B | 57% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $1.3B | 43% |
TSN
| Beef | $5.8B | 40% |
| Retail Sales Channel | $2.9B | 20% |
| Pork | $1.6B | 11% |
| Foodservice Sales Channel | $1.6B | 11% |
| Other | $776.0M | 5% |
| Industrialand Other Sales Channel | $575.0M | 4% |
| International Sales Channel | $542.0M | 4% |
| Intersegment Revenues | $534.0M | 4% |
