vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (CCO) and スカイ (SKYQ), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
スカイ runs the higher net margin — 1.7% vs 324.3%, a 322.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($30.3M vs $1.1M).
Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc.は屋外広告を専門とする多国籍企業で、本社はアメリカ合衆国テキサス州サンアントニオに置かれています。世界各国の市場で屋外広告メディアネットワークを展開し、様々なブランド顧客に対して場面に適した屋外広告配信サービスを提供しています。
Sky（Sky UK Limited）は英国の有名な放送・電気通信企業で、英国国内の個人および企業向けにテレビ、ブロードバンドインターネット、固定電話、移動体通信サービスを提供しています。Skyグループの子会社で、本社はアイルワースのSkyスタジオに置かれています。
CCO vs SKYQ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $461.5M | $-883.4K |
| Net Profit | $8.0M | $-2.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 136.4% |
| Operating Margin | 23.3% | 259.4% |
| Net Margin | 1.7% | 324.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.2% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 144.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.01 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $461.5M | $-883.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $405.6M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $402.8M | $-318.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.2M | $-901.6K | ||
| Q4 24 | $426.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $375.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $376.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $326.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $8.0M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-60.1M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.5M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.5M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-39.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-89.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 136.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 23.3% | 259.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.9% | 241.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.2% | 546.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | 295.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.7% | 324.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -14.8% | 357.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 693.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.7% | 369.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -27.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.12 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.08 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.19 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $190.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-3.4B | $3.2M |
| Total Assets | $3.8B | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $190.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $155.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $138.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $395.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $201.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $189.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $193.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.7B | — |
| Q4 25 | $-3.4B | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.5B | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4B | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.4B | $9.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $20.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $24.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.6B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $56.3M | $1.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $30.3M | $1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.6% | -128.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 5.6% | -4.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 7.04× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $32.0M | $-3.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $56.3M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.2M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.6M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-34.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $30.3M | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.4M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-29.2M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.6M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-27.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-61.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | -128.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.2% | 123.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.2% | 390.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.2% | 221.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -18.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | -4.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.7% | -4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.6% | -3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.32× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
