vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of セラニーズ (CE) and ハンツマン (HUN), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
セラニーズ is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.6× ハンツマン). セラニーズ runs the higher net margin — 0.6% vs -7.1%, a 7.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ハンツマン posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-6.7% vs -7.0%). セラニーズ produced more free cash flow last quarter ($168.0M vs $19.0M). Over the past eight quarters, ハンツマン's revenue compounded faster (-4.0% CAGR vs -8.1%).
セラニーズ社はテキサス州アービングに本社を置く米国の技術・特殊材料メーカーで、フォーチュン500にランクインしている。年間約195万トンの酢酸を生産し世界シェアの約20%を占めるほか、酢酸ビニルモノマー（VAM）の生産量も世界一位です。
ハンツマンコーポレーションは米国テキサス州ウッドランズに本社を置く多国籍化学メーカーで、消費者向け・産業向けにポリウレタン、高機能製品、接着剤などを製造・販売しています。BMW、GE、シェブロン、P&G、ユニリーバなどを主要顧客に持ち、25カ国以上に60を超える生産・研究開発・拠点を展開し、約7,000人の従業員を擁しています。
CE vs HUN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $-96.0M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | 12.1% |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | -4.4% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | -7.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | -6.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | 31.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $-0.56 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $-96.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $-25.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $-158.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $-5.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $-141.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $-33.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $22.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.0M | $-37.0M |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 14.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | 12.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | 15.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | 13.7% |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | -4.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | -4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | -2.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | -7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | -1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | -0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | -2.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $-0.56 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $-0.92 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $-0.82 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.10 | $-0.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $429.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | $2.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $2.8B |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $7.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | 0.73× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | — | $429.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $468.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $399.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $334.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $340.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $330.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $335.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $552.0M |
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0B | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $3.2B |
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $7.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.0B | $7.6B |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | 0.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | 0.72× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | 0.60× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.56× | 0.65× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | $76.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | $19.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 1.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 3.8% | 4.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 18.00× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | $116.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $76.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $196.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $91.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $-74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $153.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $129.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $46.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.0M | $-65.0M |
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $19.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $153.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $54.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $-110.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $102.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $88.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.0M | $-107.0M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | -7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | -0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | -7.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 2.09× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.83× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
HUN
| Diversified | $897.0M | 66% |
| Specialty | $231.0M | 17% |
| Performance Products | $113.0M | 8% |
| Advanced Materials | $61.0M | 5% |
| Related Party Customers | $19.0M | 1% |
| Other | $12.0M | 1% |
