vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COMMERCIAL METALS Co (CMC) and Ternium S.A. (TX), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Commercial Metals Company (CMC) is a company that produces rebar and related construction materials headquartered in Irving, Texas. Along with Nucor, it is one of two primary suppliers of steel used to reinforce concrete in buildings, bridges, roads, and infrastructure in the U.S. The company also owns Tensar, a producer of foundation systems used for the construction of roadways, public infrastructure, and industrial facilities.
Ternium S.A. is a manufacturer of flat and long steel products with production centers in Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Guatemala, Colombia, and the United States. Ternium owns a 51.5% interest in Usiminas of Brazil. The company has an annual production capacity of 15.4 million tons. In 2023, 55% of its sales were from Mexico; 21% of sales were from Argentina; Bolivia, Chile, Paraguay and Uruguay; 13% of sales were from Brazil; and 11% of sales were from the United States, Colombia and Central A...
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | $177.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-175.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $103.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $85.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.58 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.33 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.73 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.22 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.54 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.90 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.02 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.73 | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
