vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DAQO NEW ENERGY CORP. (DQ) and TIGO ENERGY, INC. (TYGO), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Daqo New Energy Corp. is a Chinese company engaged in the manufacture of monocrystalline silicon (mono-Si) and polysilicon (poly-Si), primarily for use in solar photovoltaic systems. The company operates a mono-Si and poly-Si manufacturing facility located in Shihezi, Xinjiang Province, China. Daqo formerly manufactured silicon wafers at a facility in Chongqing, China and photovoltaic modules at a facility in Nanjing, China.
Tigo Energy is an American private corporation, headquartered in Los Gatos, California, United States. It provides products, technologies, software, and services to installers, distributors, and original equipment manufacturers within the photovoltaic industry. It specializes in module-level power optimizers and smart module power electronics.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $30.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $24.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $18.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $14.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.8M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $9.2B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $17.1B |
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-4.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-7.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-11.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-11.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $29.1M |
| Q3 25 | — | 42.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 38.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.2% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 0.0% |
| Q3 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -21.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -73.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -66.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -92.7% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -0.1% |
| Q3 25 | — | -7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -18.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -37.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -92.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -89.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -117.4% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 0.2% |
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.22 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.19 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-0.27 |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
