vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ENERGY FOCUS, INC/DE (EFOI) and KOREA ELECTRIC POWER CORP (KEP), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NRG Energy, Inc. is an American energy company, headquartered in Houston, Texas. It was formerly the wholesale arm of Northern States Power Company (NSP), which became Xcel Energy, but became independent in 2000. NRG Energy is involved in energy generation and retail electricity. Their portfolio includes natural gas generation, coal generation, oil generation, nuclear generation, wind generation, utility-scale generation, and distributed solar generation. NRG serves over 7 million retail cust...
Korea Electric Power Corporation, better known as KEPCO (Korean: 켑코) or Hanjeon (Korean: 한전), is the largest electric utility in South Korea, responsible for the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity and the development of electric power projects including those in nuclear power, wind power and coal. KEPCO, through its subsidiaries, is responsible for 96% of Korea's electricity generation as of 2023. The South Korean government owns a 51.10% share of KEPCO. Together with it...
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $975.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $826.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $616.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $833.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $-356.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-172.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-231.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-268.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-294.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-316.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-554.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-418.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | 18.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -36.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -21.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -19.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -43.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -22.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -33.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -35.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -71.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -36.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -43.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -35.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -50.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
