vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EDGEWELL PERSONAL CARE Co (EPC) and NU SKIN ENTERPRISES, INC. (NUS), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EDGEWELL PERSONAL CARE Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($422.8M vs $370.3M, roughly 1.1× NU SKIN ENTERPRISES, INC.). NU SKIN ENTERPRISES, INC. runs the higher net margin — -15.5% vs 3.9%, a 19.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EDGEWELL PERSONAL CARE Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-11.6% vs -16.9%). NU SKIN ENTERPRISES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($5.9M vs $-137.5M). Over the past eight quarters, NU SKIN ENTERPRISES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (-5.8% CAGR vs -16.0%).
The Edgewell Personal Care Company is an American multinational consumer products company headquartered in Shelton, Connecticut. It was formed in 2015 following the corporate spin-off from Energizer Holdings, Inc..
Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. is an American multilevel marketing company that develops and sells personal care products and dietary and nutritional supplements. Under the Nu Skin and Pharmanex brands, the company sells its products in 54 markets through a network of approximately 1.2 million independent distributors.
EPC vs NUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $422.8M | $370.3M |
| Net Profit | $-65.7M | $14.5M |
| Gross Margin | 38.1% | 70.7% |
| Operating Margin | -4.5% | 6.3% |
| Net Margin | -15.5% | 3.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -11.6% | -16.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3028.6% | 140.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.41 | $0.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $422.8M | $370.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $600.5M | $364.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $627.2M | $386.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $580.7M | $364.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $415.1M | $445.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $517.6M | $430.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $647.8M | $439.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $599.4M | $417.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-65.7M | $14.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-30.6M | $17.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.1M | $21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.0M | $107.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.1M | $-36.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.8M | $8.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.0M | $-118.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.0M | $-533.0K |
| Q4 25 | 38.1% | 70.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.9% | 70.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.8% | 68.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.1% | 67.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.6% | 62.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.1% | 70.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.3% | 70.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.1% | 70.5% |
| Q4 25 | -4.5% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.2% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.6% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.1% | -2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.2% | -11.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.8% | -28.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.7% | 2.1% |
| Q4 25 | -15.5% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.1% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 29.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.5% | -8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | -26.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.0% | -0.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-1.41 | $0.27 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.65 | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.62 | $0.43 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.60 | $2.14 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.73 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.18 | $0.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.98 | $-2.38 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.72 | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $239.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.5B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $805.2M |
| Total Assets | $3.8B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.03× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | — | $239.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $253.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $265.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $213.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $198.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $209.1M | $237.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $232.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $221.2M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $805.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $799.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $787.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $754.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $651.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $706.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $686.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $810.2M |
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.89× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.95× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.97× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.82× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.88× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-125.9M | $16.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-137.5M | $5.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -32.5% | 1.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 2.7% | 2.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | 1.15× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $36.3M | $46.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $-125.9M | $16.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.1M | $27.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $114.8M | $35.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.1M | $389.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-115.6M | $25.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-388.3M | $31.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $101.2M | $51.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $129.0M | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-137.5M | $5.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.5M | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.3M | $35.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.0M | $-13.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-132.4M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-414.2M | $22.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.6M | $43.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $117.5M | $-9.0M |
| Q4 25 | -32.5% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.8% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.8% | -3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -31.9% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -80.0% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.7% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.6% | -2.1% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.9% | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.95× | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.56× | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -44.13× | 3.79× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.07× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.58× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EPC
| Other | $242.0M | 57% |
| Sunand Skin Care Segment | $131.5M | 31% |
| Shavinggelsandcreams | $32.3M | 8% |
| Wipes And Other Skin Care Products | $17.0M | 4% |
NUS
| Other | $161.9M | 44% |
| Mainland China Segment | $52.0M | 14% |
| Southeast Asia Pacific Segment | $50.5M | 14% |
| Europe And Africa Segment | $41.8M | 11% |
| Hong Kong Taiwan Segment | $29.6M | 8% |
| South Korea Segment | $28.4M | 8% |
| Rhyz Other Segment | $6.1M | 2% |