vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fifth District Bancorp, Inc. (FDSB) and FNB CORP/PA/ (FNB), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FNB CORP/PA/ is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($366.0M vs $3.4M, roughly 107.1× Fifth District Bancorp, Inc.). FNB CORP/PA/ runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs 45.9%, a 30.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fifth District Bancorp, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.9% vs 13.7%). FNB CORP/PA/ produced more free cash flow last quarter ($99.0M vs $-126.0K).
フィフス・サード・バンコープはアメリカ合衆国オハイオ州シンシナティに本社を置く銀行持株会社です。傘下の中心的機関であるフィフス・サード銀行は米国12州に1087店舗と2400台のATMを展開しており、米国屈指の大手銀行の1つで、フォーチュン500で321位にランクされています。
FNBコーポレーションは米国ペンシルベニア州ピッツバーグに本社を置く多角的金融サービス企業で、最大子会社であるファーストナショナルバンクの持株会社です。2025年12月31日時点の総資産は500億米ドルを超え、米国各地の主要都市圏で事業を展開しています。
FDSB vs FNB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.4M | $366.0M |
| Net Profit | $541.0K | $168.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 18.1% | 45.1% |
| Net Margin | 15.8% | 45.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 19.9% | 13.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 240.3% | 52.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.10 | $0.47 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.4M | $366.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $359.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1M | $348.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $323.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $322.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $323.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $316.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $319.0M |
| Q4 25 | $541.0K | $168.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $343.0K | $150.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1M | $130.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.0K | $117.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $110.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $110.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $123.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $122.0M |
| Q4 25 | 18.1% | 45.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.0% | 52.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 96.4% | 47.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 45.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 49.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 48.9% |
| Q4 25 | 15.8% | 45.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.3% | 41.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 99.3% | 37.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 36.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 34.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 38.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 38.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | $0.47 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.07 | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.61 | $0.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.02 | $0.32 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.31 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.30 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.34 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $33.9M | $2.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $129.8M | $6.8B |
| Total Assets | $534.4M | $50.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $33.9M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.4M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.7M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.1M | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $129.8M | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.3M | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $130.9M | $6.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $127.3M | $6.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.0B |
| Q4 25 | $534.4M | $50.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $539.5M | $49.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $539.8M | $49.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $531.1M | $49.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $48.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $48.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $47.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $45.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.39× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-44.0K | $128.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-126.0K | $99.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.7% | 27.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 2.4% | 7.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | -0.08× | 0.76× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $942.0K | $376.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $-44.0K | $128.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $117.0K | $167.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $430.0K | $123.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $823.0K | $64.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $326.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-14.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $85.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $245.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-126.0K | $99.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.0K | $149.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $249.0K | $85.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $765.0K | $43.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $278.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-46.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $55.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $216.0M |
| Q4 25 | -3.7% | 27.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 41.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 24.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.0% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 86.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -14.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 67.7% |
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.7% | 10.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.1% |
| Q4 25 | -0.08× | 0.76× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.34× | 1.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.14× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.55× | 0.55× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
