vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ituran Location & Control Ltd. (ITRN) and WABASH NATIONAL Corp (WNC), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ituran Location and Control Ltd. is an Israeli company that provides stolen vehicle recovery (SVR) and tracking services, and markets GPS wireless communications products. Ituran is traded on NASDAQ and is included in the TA-100 Index. Ituran has over 3,200 employees worldwide and is a market leader in Brazil, Argentina, Israel and the United States. As of June 2020, the company has more than 2M subscribers.
Wabash is an American diversified industrial manufacturing company and one of North America's largest producers of semi-trailers and truck bodies. The company specializes in the design and production of dry freight vans, refrigerated vans, platform trailers, liquid tank trailers, truck bodies and composite products. Its products are sold primarily under the Wabash brand name since 2022. Prior to 2022, products were sold under: Wabash National, Transcraft, Benson, Walker Transport, Brenner Tan...
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $321.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $381.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $458.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $380.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $416.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $464.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $550.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $515.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-49.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $40.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-9.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $230.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-330.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $18.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 14.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | -18.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 82.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -93.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -15.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -71.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.97 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.23 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.36 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-7.53 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.64 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.39 |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.