vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Liberty Live Holdings, Inc. (LLYVA) and スカイ (SKYQ), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
スカイ runs the higher net margin — -90.3% vs 324.3%, a 414.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
リバティ・メディア・コーポレーションはジョン・C・マローンが1991年に創設した米国の大手メディア企業です。トラッキングストックが個別発行される2つの事業部門を持ち、F1グループとライブネーション・エンターテイメントの株式を保有、2025年現在はF1、MotoGP、世界スーパーバイク選手権3つのモータースポーツ事業を所有しています。
Sky（Sky UK Limited）は英国の有名な放送・電気通信企業で、英国国内の個人および企業向けにテレビ、ブロードバンドインターネット、固定電話、移動体通信サービスを提供しています。Skyグループの子会社で、本社はアイルワースのSkyスタジオに置かれています。
LLYVA vs SKYQ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $61.7M | $-883.4K |
| Net Profit | $-55.7M | $-2.9M |
| Gross Margin | 20.6% | 136.4% |
| Operating Margin | -27.2% | 259.4% |
| Net Margin | -90.3% | 324.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.8% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -464.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $-883.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.7M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-318.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-901.6K | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-55.7M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 136.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 259.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.2% | 241.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 546.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 295.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -22.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 324.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -90.3% | 357.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 693.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 369.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.8% | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $375.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.9B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-409.2M | $3.2M |
| Total Assets | $1.9B | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $375.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-409.2M | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $20.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $24.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $1.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -128.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | — | -4.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-3.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -128.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 123.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 390.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 221.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -4.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
