vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Micropolis Holding Co (MCRP) and Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Micropolis Corporation was a disk drive company located in Chatsworth, California and founded in 1976. Micropolis initially manufactured high capacity hard-sectored 5.25-inch floppy drives and controllers, later manufacturing hard drives using SCSI and ESDI interfaces.
Pure Storage, Inc. is an American publicly traded technology company headquartered in Santa Clara, California, United States. It develops all-flash data storage hardware and software products. Pure Storage was founded in 2009 and developed its products in stealth mode until 2011. Afterwards, the company grew in revenues by about 50% per quarter and raised more than $470 million in venture capital funding, before going public in 2015. Initially, Pure Storage developed the software for storage ...
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $964.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $861.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $778.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $879.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $831.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $763.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $693.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $789.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $54.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $47.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-14.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $42.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $63.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-35.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $65.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 72.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 70.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 68.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 67.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 70.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 70.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 71.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 72.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -6.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.22 |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
