vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NextTrip, Inc. (NTRP) and Zebra Technologies (ZBRA), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Zebra Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.2M, roughly 1229.0× NextTrip, Inc.). Zebra Technologies runs the higher net margin — -272.9% vs 4.7%, a 277.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NextTrip, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1508.0% vs 10.6%). Over the past eight quarters, NextTrip, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (266.1% CAGR vs 12.0%).
NeXT, Inc. was an American technology company headquartered in Redwood City, California, which specialized in computer workstations for higher education and business markets, and later developed the first dynamic web page software. It was founded in 1985 by Steve Jobs, the Apple Computer co-founder who had been removed from Apple that year. NeXT debuted with the NeXT Computer in 1988, and released the NeXTcube and smaller NeXTstation in 1990. The series had relatively limited sales, with only...
Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBR), commonly known as Zebra, is an American multinational technology conglomerate corporation specializing in smart data capture systems. Zebra is headquartered in Lincolnshire, Illinois outside of Chicago with 10,700 employees across 57 countries.
NTRP vs ZBRA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2M | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $-3.3M | $70.0M |
| Gross Margin | 18.1% | 47.3% |
| Operating Margin | -257.0% | 9.4% |
| Net Margin | -272.9% | 4.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 1508.0% | 10.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -63.0% | -57.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.37 | $1.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $757.6K | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $138.8K | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.5K | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.6K | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $154.5K | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $188.8K | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $89.6K | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $-3.3M | $70.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.9M | $101.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.5M | $112.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.6M | $136.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.0M | $163.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.5M | $137.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.0M | $113.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.4M | $115.0M |
| Q4 25 | 18.1% | 47.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.9% | 48.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.0% | 47.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.6% | 49.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | 48.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.6% | 48.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.1% | 48.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.4% | 47.9% |
| Q4 25 | -257.0% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -422.7% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3342.1% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2656.6% | 14.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2376.3% | 16.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -951.0% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1034.1% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1890.7% | 13.5% |
| Q4 25 | -272.9% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -382.5% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3210.6% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5506.1% | 10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2692.1% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -993.3% | 10.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1048.1% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3797.0% | 9.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.37 | $1.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.39 | $1.97 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.68 | $2.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $2.62 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.35 | $3.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.14 | $2.64 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.55 | $2.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.4M | $125.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.9M | $3.6B |
| Total Assets | $14.4M | $8.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $125.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $130.9K | $872.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $879.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4K | $901.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $102.0K | $676.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.7K | $411.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $323.8K | $127.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $5.9M | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.6M | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.7M | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4M | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.4M | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-134.1K | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1M | $3.2B |
| Q4 25 | $14.4M | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.9M | $8.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.0M | $7.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.9M | $7.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0M | $8.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $7.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7M | $7.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.1M | $7.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.66× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.0M | $357.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $327.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 22.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | — | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | 5.10× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $831.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $-2.0M | $357.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $572.4K | $235.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.0M | $147.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.9M | $178.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.2M | $306.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-810.2K | $294.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1M | $288.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.1M | $125.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $327.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $216.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $130.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $158.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $288.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $277.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $278.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $111.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 22.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.31× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.31× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.55× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.09× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NTRP
Segment breakdown not available.
ZBRA
| Tangible Products | $1.2B | 83% |
| Service And Software | $255.0M | 17% |
