vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Portillo's Inc. (PTLO) and RED ROBIN GOURMET BURGERS INC (RRGB), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RED ROBIN GOURMET BURGERS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($265.1M vs $185.7M, roughly 1.4× Portillo's Inc.). Portillo's Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.4% vs -6.9%, a 10.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Portillo's Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.6% vs -3.5%). Portillo's Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-9.2M vs $-10.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Portillo's Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (5.8% CAGR vs -5.8%).
Portillo's Restaurant Group, Inc. is an American fast casual restaurant chain based in the Chicago area that specializes in serving Chicago-style food such as hot dogs, Maxwell Street Polish, and Italian beef. The company was founded by Dick Portillo on April 9, 1963, in Villa Park, Illinois, under the name "The Dog House".
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc., more commonly known as Red Robin Gourmet Burgers and Brews or simply Red Robin, is an American chain of casual dining restaurants founded in 1969 in Seattle, Washington. In 1979, the first franchised Red Robin restaurant was opened in Yakima, Washington. Red Robin's headquarters is in Greenwood Village, Colorado. As of December 2024, the company operated a total of 498 restaurants, with 91 being operated as a franchise.
PTLO vs RRGB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $185.7M | $265.1M |
| Net Profit | $6.3M | $-18.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | -4.6% |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | -6.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.6% | -3.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -49.5% | 2.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.08 | $-1.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $185.7M | $265.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $181.4M | $283.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $188.5M | $392.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $176.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $184.6M | $274.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $178.3M | $300.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $181.9M | $388.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $165.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $6.3M | $-18.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.7M | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.4M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.5M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | -4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.0% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.5% | -4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | -1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.0% | -0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | -6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.7% | -6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | -3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.08 | $-1.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.02 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.12 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.17 | $-1.20 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.11 | $-0.61 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $-0.61 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.08 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $21.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $334.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $467.8M | $-96.1M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $574.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.71× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | — | $21.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $24.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $24.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $22.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $23.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $30.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $334.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $322.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $319.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $311.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $302.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $467.8M | $-96.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $459.4M | $-78.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $458.9M | $-80.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $406.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $401.1M | $-53.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $382.4M | $-36.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $370.2M | $-29.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $360.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $574.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $586.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $606.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $669.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $689.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $717.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.78× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.82× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.89× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $23.2M | $-3.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-9.2M | $-10.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -4.9% | -3.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 17.4% | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 3.69× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-18.5M | $-17.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $23.2M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.0M | $9.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.2M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.1M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.3M | $512.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.6M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-9.2M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.0M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.6M | $-18.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.7M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.6M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | -4.9% | -3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.7% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.0% | -6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.3% | -1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 17.4% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.8% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.7% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.3% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.69× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.51× | 2.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.21× | 15.67× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.85× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.10× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.20× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.03× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.99× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PTLO
Segment breakdown not available.
RRGB
| Food And Beverage | $260.9M | 98% |
| Franchise | $3.3M | 1% |
| Products And Services Loyalty | $1.1M | 0% |
