vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of QUALYS, INC. (QLYS) and SentinelOne, Inc. (S), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SentinelOne, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($258.9M vs $175.3M, roughly 1.5× QUALYS, INC.). QUALYS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 30.3% vs -23.3%, a 53.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SentinelOne, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (22.9% vs 10.1%). QUALYS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($74.9M vs $20.9M).
Qualys, Inc. is an American technology firm based in Foster City, California, specializing in cloud security, compliance and related services.
SentinelOne, Inc. is an American cybersecurity company listed on NYSE based in Mountain View, California. The company was founded in 2013 by Tomer Weingarten, Almog Cohen and Ehud ("Udi") Shamir. Weingarten acts as the company's CEO. The company has approximately 2,800 employees and offices in Mountain View, Boston, Prague, Tokyo, and Tel Aviv. The company uses machine learning for monitoring personal computers, IoT devices, and cloud workloads. The company's platform utilizes a heuristic mod...
QLYS vs S — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q3 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $175.3M | $258.9M |
| Net Profit | $53.1M | $-60.3M |
| Gross Margin | 83.4% | 73.8% |
| Operating Margin | 33.6% | -28.3% |
| Net Margin | 30.3% | -23.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.1% | 22.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 20.9% | 23.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.47 | $-0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $175.3M | $258.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.9M | $242.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $164.1M | $229.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $159.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $148.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $145.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $53.1M | $-60.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.3M | $-72.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.3M | $-208.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 83.4% | 73.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 83.6% | 75.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 82.4% | 75.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 81.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 81.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 81.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 82.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 81.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 33.6% | -28.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.3% | -33.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | -38.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 30.3% | -23.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.6% | -29.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.8% | -90.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.47 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.39 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.29 | $-0.63 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.29 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.24 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.17 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.05 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $250.3M | $649.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $561.2M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $2.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $250.3M | $649.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $225.3M | $810.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.0M | $766.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $290.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $232.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $235.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $281.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $273.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $561.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $529.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $508.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $498.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $477.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $449.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $427.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $404.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $999.5M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $996.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $973.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $908.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $876.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $861.8M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $75.7M | $21.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $74.9M | $20.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 42.8% | 8.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 0.4% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 1.42× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $304.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $75.7M | $21.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.4M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.8M | $52.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $109.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $85.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $74.9M | $20.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.5M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.4M | $52.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $107.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $83.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | 42.8% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.7% | -0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 67.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 57.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.42× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.80× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.31× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.09× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.32× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.14× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.15× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
QLYS
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $88.6M | 51% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $86.7M | 49% |
S
| US | $154.8M | 60% |
| Non Us | $104.1M | 40% |
