vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SuperCom Ltd (SPCB) and WIDEPOINT CORP (WYY), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WIDEPOINT CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($42.3M vs $14.2M, roughly 3.0× SuperCom Ltd). SuperCom Ltd runs the higher net margin — 37.5% vs -2.0%, a 39.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WIDEPOINT CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.3% vs -1.5%). WIDEPOINT CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-270.0K vs $-3.6M).
Super.com is a technology company headquartered in San Francisco and co-founded by Hussein Fazal and Henry Shi. The company provides financial services, including reward programs and travel bookings.
WidePoint Corporation is an American company based in Fairfax, Virginia that provides technology-based products and services to the government sector and commercial markets in the United States. The company holds a patent for a digital parsing tool that allows users to access accounts through a secure repository gateway, established using asymmetric authentication employed as public key infrastructure (PKI). WidePoint provides smart card identity verification, wireless expense management, pen...
SPCB vs WYY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.2M | $42.3M |
| Net Profit | $5.3M | $-849.4K |
| Gross Margin | 61.2% | 13.8% |
| Operating Margin | 16.3% | -1.9% |
| Net Margin | 37.5% | -2.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.5% | 12.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 79.5% | -138.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.32 | $-0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $42.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $36.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.2M | $37.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $34.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $37.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $34.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.4M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $34.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-849.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-559.2K | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | $-618.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-724.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-356.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-425.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | $-499.6K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-653.1K |
| Q4 25 | — | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 61.2% | 13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.3% | 13.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 13.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.3% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.7% | -1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.5% | -1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.6% | -1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.32 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.19 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $15.0M | $9.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $37.3M | $11.5M |
| Total Assets | $65.5M | $79.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | — | $9.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.0M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.3M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.8M | $14.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $14.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $79.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $70.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $65.5M | $76.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $71.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $71.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $56.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.6M | $58.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $54.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.2M | $-173.5K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-3.6M | $-270.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -25.3% | -0.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 10.0% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | -0.41× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $5.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | — | $-173.5K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-950.0K | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-270.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.6M | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -25.3% | 8.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.8% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -4.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.32× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SPCB
Segment breakdown not available.
WYY
| Carrier Services | $26.8M | 63% |
| Managed Services | $15.5M | 37% |
