vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of S&P Global (SPGI) and TORONTO DOMINION BANK (TD), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
S&P Global Inc. is an American publicly traded corporation headquartered in Manhattan, New York. Its primary areas of business are financial information, analytics, and energy and commodities intelligence. It is the parent company of S&P Global Ratings, S&P Global Energy, S&P Global Market Intelligence, S&P Global Mobility, and the Indian credit rating agency CRISIL. It is also the majority owner of the S&P Dow Jones Indices joint venture. "S&P" is a shortening of "Standard and Poor's".
Toronto-Dominion Bank, doing business as TD Bank Group, and commonly known as just TD, is a Canadian multinational banking and financial services corporation headquartered in Toronto, Ontario. The bank was created on February 1, 1955, through the merger of the Bank of Toronto and the Dominion Bank, which were founded in 1855 and 1869, respectively. It is one of two Big Five banks of Canada founded in Toronto, the other being the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $879.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $971.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $991.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 70.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 71.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 70.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 69.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 69.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 70.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 69.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 67.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 42.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.76 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.86 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.50 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.54 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.85 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.11 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.23 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.16 | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
