vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SSR MINING INC. (SSRM) and TECK RESOURCES LTD (TECK), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TECK RESOURCES LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.3B vs $521.7M, roughly 12.0× SSR MINING INC.).
SSR Mining Inc., formerly Silver Standard Resources is a Denver-based gold, silver, copper, lead and zinc producer that owns the largest silver mine in Argentina. In addition it engages in exploration activity throughout the Americas and Turkey. In 2020, SSR Mining merged with Alacer Gold. Since the merger, the company has moved headquarters to Denver, Colorado. Rodney P. Antal is now the president and CEO of SSR mining. In February 2021, SSR Mining announced that Alison White would be the ne...
Teck Resources Limited is a diversified natural resources company headquartered in Vancouver, British Columbia, that is engaged in mining and mineral development, including coal for the steelmaking industry, copper, zinc, and energy. Secondary products include lead, silver, gold, molybdenum, germanium, indium and cadmium. Teck Resources was formed from the amalgamation of Teck and Cominco in 2001.
SSRM vs TECK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $521.7M | $6.3B |
| Net Profit | $181.5M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 17.0% |
| Operating Margin | 38.8% | -3.0% |
| Net Margin | 34.8% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 61.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 3166.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.84 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $521.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $385.8M | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $405.5M | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $316.6M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $323.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $257.4M | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.8M | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $230.2M | $3.8B |
| Q4 25 | $181.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $90.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-287.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 44.0% |
| Q4 25 | 38.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.6% | -3.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.9% | -3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.1% | -2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 39.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -163.5% | 49.0% |
| Q4 25 | 34.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -124.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.84 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.31 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.42 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.28 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.42 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $575.6M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.5B | — |
| Total Assets | $6.1B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $575.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $445.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $438.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $341.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $417.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $365.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $384.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $492.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $228.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $228.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $228.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $228.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $6.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.07× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $172.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $106.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 20.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 12.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 0.95× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $241.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $172.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $157.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $84.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $95.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-78.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $106.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-116.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -13.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -62.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.95× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.87× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.75× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.10× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.13× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SSRM
| Gold | $369.3M | 71% |
| Concentrate Sales | $124.4M | 24% |
| Other | $19.1M | 4% |
| Lead | $9.0M | 2% |
TECK
Segment breakdown not available.