Biggest changeMineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. 39 Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries • Mineral resources have been reported as in situ (hard rock within an optimized pit shell and above the effective cut-off grade), with reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction remaining available. • Classification of the Mineral Resource has taken into account varying confidence levels and assessment, and whether the appropriate account has been taken for all relevant factors, i.e., relative confidence in tonnage/grade, computations, confidence in the continuity of geology and grade, quantity and distribution of the data and the results reflect the view of the QP. • The cut-off grade of 0.55% Li2O is based on estimated mining and processing costs and recovery factors. • The long-term price of $1,500/metric tonne of product over a timeline of 7 to 10 years is above the current spot price and was selected based on the reasonable long-term prospect rather than the short-term viability (0.5 to 2 years). • Mineral resources tonnage and contained metal have been rounded to reflect the accuracy of the estimate, and numbers may not add due to rounding.
Biggest changeMineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. • Mineral resources have been reported as in situ (hard rock within an optimized pit shell and above the effective cut-off grade), without applying mining dilution, mining losses, or process losses. • Classification of the Mineral Resource has taken into account varying confidence levels and assessment, and whether the appropriate account has been taken for all relevant factors, i.e., relative confidence in tonnage/grade, computations, confidence in the continuity of geology and grade, quantity and distribution of the data and the results reflect the view of the QP. • The cut-off grade of 0.5% Li2O is based on estimated mining and processing costs and recovery factors.
A copy of the QP’s most recent technical report summary with respect to the lithium mineral resource and reserve estimates at the Silver Peak facility, dated February 8, 2025, with an effective date of June 30, 2024, is filed as Exhibit 96.4 to this report. The mineral resource economic assumptions remain unchanged from June 30, 2024.
A copy of the QP’s most recent technical report summary with respect to the lithium mineral resource and reserve estimates at the Silver Peak facility, dated February 8, 2025, with an effective date of June 30, 2024, is filed as Exhibit 96.4 to this report. Economic assumptions remain unchanged from June 30, 2024.
Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. • Given the dynamic reserve versus the static resource, a direct measurement of resources post-reserve extraction is not practical.
Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. • Given the dynamic reserve versus the static resource, a direct measurement of resources post-reserve extraction is not practical.
Therefore, as a simplification, to calculate mineral resources exclusive of reserves, the quantity of lithium pumped in the life of mine plan was subtracted from the overall resource without modification to lithium concentration.
Therefore, as a simplification, to calculate mineral resources exclusive of reserves, the quantity of lithium pumped in the life of mine plan was subtracted from the overall resource without modification to lithium concentration.
As only approximately one percent of the available resource is consumed from the Dead Sea, as noted above, the reserve estimate is based on the amount the JBC plant can produce over until the end of 2058, when the APC concession agreement ends.
As only approximately one percent of the available resource is consumed from the Dead Sea, as noted above, the reserve estimate is based on the amount the JBC plant can produce over until the end of 2058, when the APC concession agreement ends.
There are no mineral resource estimates at the Magnolia, AR bromine extraction site. All bromine mineral accumulations of economic interest and with reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction within the Magnolia production lease area are either currently on production or subject to an economically viable future development plan and are classified as mineral reserves.
There are no mineral resource estimates at the Magnolia, AR bromine extraction site. All bromine mineral accumulations of economic interest and with reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction within the Magnolia production lease area are either currently on production or subject to an economically viable future development plan and are classified as mineral reserves.
Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. • Mineral resources have been reported as in situ (hard rock within an optimized pit shell and above the effective cut-off grade), with reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction remaining available. • Classification of the Mineral Resource has taken into account varying confidence levels and assessment, and whether the appropriate account has been taken for all relevant factors, i.e., relative confidence in tonnage/grade, computations, confidence in the continuity of geology and grade, quantity and distribution of the data and the results reflect the view of the QP. • The cut-off grade of 0.5% Li2O is based on estimated mining and processing costs and recovery factors. • The long-term price of $1,500/metric tonne of product over a timeline of 7 to 10 years is above the current spot price and was selected based on the reasonable long-term prospect rather than the short-term viability (0.5 to 2 years). • Mineral resources tonnage and contained metal have been rounded to reflect the accuracy of the estimate, and numbers may not add due to rounding.
Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. • Mineral resources have been reported as in situ (hard rock within an optimized pit shell and above the effective cut-off grade), with reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction remaining available. • Classification of the Mineral Resource has taken into account varying confidence levels and assessment, and whether the appropriate account has been taken for all relevant factors, i.e., relative confidence in tonnage/grade, computations, confidence in the continuity of geology and grade, quantity and distribution of the data and the results reflect the view of the QP. • The cut-off grade of 0.3% Li2O is based on estimated mining and processing costs and recovery factors. • The long-term price of $1,500/metric tonne of product over a timeline of 7 to 10 years is above the current spot price and was selected based on the reasonable long-term prospect rather than the short-term viability (0.5 to 2 years). • Mineral resources tonnage and contained metal have been rounded to reflect the accuracy of the estimate, and numbers may not add due to rounding.
Item 2. Properties. We operate globally, with our principal executive offices located in Charlotte, North Carolina and regional shared services offices located in Budapest, Hungary and Dalian, China. Each of these properties are leased. We and our affiliates also operate regional sales and administrative offices in various locations throughout the world, which are generally leased.
Item 2. Properties. We operate globally, with our principal executive offices located in Charlotte, North Carolina and regional shared services offices located in Budapest, Hungary and Dalian, China. Each of these properties are leased. We and our affiliates also operate regional sales, technology and administrative offices in various locations throughout the world, which are generally leased.
Production amounts presented from Wodgina represent 60% of production of the Wodgina mine which is attributable to the Company’s interest in the MARBL joint venture until October 18, 2023, when we reduced our ownership percentage to 50% following the restructuring of the MARBL joint venture with MRL.
(c) Production amounts presented from Wodgina represent 60% of production of the Wodgina mine which is attributable to the Company’s interest in the MARBL joint venture until October 18, 2023, when we reduced our ownership percentage to 50% following the restructuring of the MARBL joint venture with MRL.
The Silver Peak mineral resources, exclusive of reserves, estimates with depletion from production from the effective date of the report through December 31, 2024 are summarized in the following table: Amount (‘000s metric tonnes) Concentration (mg/L) Measured mineral resources 7 169 Indicated mineral resources 11 155 Measured and Indicated mineral resources 17 160 Inferred mineral resources 102 130 • Mineral resources are reported exclusive of mineral reserves on a 100% ownership basis.
The Silver Peak mineral resources, exclusive of reserves, estimates with depletion from production from the effective date of the report through December 31, 2025 are summarized in the following table: Amount (‘000s metric tonnes) Concentration (mg/L) Measured mineral resources 7 169 Indicated mineral resources 11 155 Measured and Indicated mineral resources 17 160 Inferred mineral resources 102 130 • Mineral resources are reported exclusive of mineral reserves on a 100% ownership basis.
The mineral reserve estimate attributable to Albemarle’s 50% interest in its JBC joint venture is approximately 2.0 million metric tonnes of bromine from the Dead Sea. This estimate is based on the time available under the concession agreement with the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan and the processing capability of the JBC plant.
The mineral reserve estimate attributable to Albemarle’s 50% interest in its JBC joint venture is approximately 2.1 million metric tonnes of bromine from the Dead Sea. This estimate is based on the time available under the concession agreement with the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan and the processing capability of the JBC plant.
All bromine reserves reported by Albemarle for the JBC project are classified as proven mineral reserves. The mineral reserve estimate for the Safi, Jordan bromine site attributable to Albemarle’s 50% interest in its JBC joint venture is approximately 2.0 million metric tonnes of bromine from the Dead Sea.
All bromine reserves reported by Albemarle for the JBC project are classified as proven mineral reserves. The mineral reserve estimate for the Safi, Jordan bromine site attributable to Albemarle’s 50% interest in its JBC joint venture is approximately 2.1 million metric tonnes of bromine from the Dead Sea.
Bromide ion concentration of concentrated bromide-enriched brine from the APC evaporation pond used to estimate the reserve from the Dead Sea was approximately 8,742 ppm based on historical pumping. The cut-off grade of the Albemarle bromine operations has been estimated to be at 1,000 ppm.
Bromide ion concentration of concentrated bromide-enriched brine from the APC evaporation pond used to estimate the reserve from the Dead Sea was approximately 8,775 ppm based on historical pumping. The cut-off grade of the Albemarle bromine operations has been estimated to be at 1,000 ppm.
The following table provides a summary of our mineral resources, exclusive of reserves, at December 31, 2024. The below mineral resource amounts are rounded and shown in thousands of metric tonnes. Where applicable, the amounts represent Albemarle’s attributable portion based on ownership percentages noted.
The following table provides a summary of our mineral resources, exclusive of reserves, at December 31, 2025. The below mineral resource amounts are rounded and shown in thousands of metric tonnes. Where applicable, the amounts represent Albemarle’s attributable portion based on ownership percentages noted.
Measured and Indicated resources were deducted proportionate to their contribution to the overall mineral resource. • Resources are reported on an in situ basis. • Resources are reported as lithium metal. • The resources have been calculated from the block model above 740 meters above sea level. • Resources have been categorized subject to the opinion of a QP based on the amount/robustness of informing data for the estimate, consistency of geological/grade distribution, survey information. • Resources have been calculated using drainable porosity estimated from bibliographical values based on the lithology and QP’s experience in similar deposits. • The following assumptions were used in developing the 2024 resource model: ◦ The estimated economic cut-off grade utilized for resource reporting purposes is 63 mg/L lithium, based on the assumptions discussed below. ◦ A technical grade lithium carbonate price of $20,000/metric tonne CIF Asia.
Measured and Indicated resources were deducted proportionate to their contribution to the overall mineral resource. • Resources are reported on an in situ basis. • Resources are reported as lithium metal. • The resources have been calculated from the block model above 740 meters above sea level. • Resources have been categorized subject to the opinion of a QP based on the amount/robustness of informing data for the estimate, consistency of geological/grade distribution, survey information. • Resources have been calculated using drainable porosity estimated from bibliographical values based on the lithology and QP’s experience in similar deposits. • The following assumptions were used in developing the 2024 resource model, and have not been updated for the December 31, 2025 reporting: ◦ The estimated economic cut-off grade utilized for resource reporting purposes is 63 mg/L lithium, based on the assumptions discussed below. ◦ A technical grade lithium carbonate price of $20,000/metric tonne CIF Asia.
The following table provides a summary of our mineral reserves at December 31, 2024. The below mineral reserve amounts are rounded and shown in thousands of metric tonnes. The amounts represent Albemarle’s attributable portion based on ownership percentages noted above.
The following table provides a summary of our mineral reserves at December 31, 2025. The below mineral reserve amounts are rounded and shown in thousands of metric tonnes. The amounts represent Albemarle’s attributable portion based on ownership percentages noted above.
Bromide ion concentration of concentrated bromide-enriched brine from the APC evaporation pond used to estimate the reserve from the Dead Sea was approximately 8,742 ppm based on historical pumping. Mineral resource and reserve estimates were prepared by a QP with an effective date provided in the individual technical report summaries referenced in Exhibits 96.1 to 96.6 to this report.
Bromide ion concentration of concentrated bromide-enriched brine from the APC evaporation pond used to estimate the reserve from the Dead Sea was 8,775 ppm based on historical pumping. Mineral resource and reserve estimates were prepared by a QP with an effective date provided in the individual technical report summaries referenced in Exhibits 96.1 to 96.6 to this report.
JBC is extracting approximately 1 percent of the bromine available in Jordan’s share of the Dead Sea. Bromide concentration in the Dead Sea is estimated to average approximately 5,037 ppm. The cut-off grade of the Albemarle bromine operations has been estimated to be at 1,000 ppm.
JBC is extracting approximately one percent of the bromine available in Jordan’s share of the Dead Sea. Bromide concentration in the Dead Sea is estimated to average approximately 5,000 ppm. The cut-off grade of the Albemarle bromine operations has been estimated to be at 1,000 ppm.
A copy of the QP’s amended technical report summary with respect to the bromine mineral resource and reserve estimates at the Safi facility, dated February 12, 2025, is filed as Exhibit 96.5 to this report. The feedstock is drawn from the Dead Sea, a nonconventional reservoir owned by the nations of Israel and Jordan.
A copy of the QP’s amended technical report summary with respect to the bromine mineral resource and reserve estimates at the Safi facility, dated February 5, 2026, is filed as Exhibit 96.5 to this report. The feedstock is drawn from the Dead Sea, a nonconventional reservoir owned by the nations of Israel and Jordan.
A copy of the QP’s most recent technical report summary with respect to the bromine mineral resource and reserve estimates at the Magnolia facility, dated February 12, 2025, is filed as Exhibit 96.6 to this report. The amounts represent Albemarle’s attributable portion based on a 100% ownership percentage, and are presented as metric tonnes in thousands.
A copy of the QP’s most recent technical report summary with respect to the bromine mineral resource and reserve estimates at the Magnolia facility, dated February 11, 2026, is filed as Exhibit 96.6 to this report. The amounts represent Albemarle’s attributable portion based on a 100% ownership percentage, and are presented as metric tonnes in thousands.
This plan was truncated to reflect the QP’s opinion on uncertainty associated with the production plan, as a direct conversion of measured and indicated resources to proven and probable reserve is not possible in the same way as a typical hard rock mining project. • The 2024 reserve model used as the basis for depletion has not been updated.
This plan was truncated to reflect the QP’s opinion on uncertainty associated with the production plan, as a direct conversion of measured and indicated resources to proven and probable reserve is not possible in the same way as a typical hard rock mining project. • The reserve model used as the basis for depletion was updated in 2024, and has not been updated for the December 31, 2025 reporting.
Differences between the amounts in the table above and those amounts in the technical report summaries represent estimated depletion from the effective date of the report until December 31, 2024.
Differences between the amounts in the table above and those amounts in the technical report summaries represent estimated depletion from the effective date of the report until December 31, 2025.
A copy of the QP’s most recent technical report summary with respect to the lithium mineral resource and reserve estimates at the Salar de Atacama facility, dated February 8, 2025, with an effective date of June 30, 2024, is filed as Exhibit 96.3 to this report. The mineral resource economic assumptions remain unchanged from June 30, 2024.
A copy of the QP’s most recent technical report summary with respect to the lithium mineral resource and reserve estimates at the Salar de Atacama facility, dated February 9, 2026, with an effective date of June 30, 2025, is filed as Exhibit 96.3 to this report. Economic assumptions remain unchanged from June 30, 2025.
Resources are reported as lithium metal. • Resources have been categorized subject to the opinion of a QP based on the amount/robustness of informing data for the estimate, consistency of geological/grade distribution, survey information. • Resources have been calculated using drainable porosity estimated from measured values in Upper Halite and Volcano-sedimentary units, and bibliographical values based on the lithology and QP’s experience in similar deposits. • The following assumptions were used in developing the 2024 resource model: ◦ The estimated economic cut-off grade utilized for resource reporting purposes is 904 mg/l lithium, based on the following assumptions: ◦ A technical grade lithium carbonate price of $20,000/metric tonne CIF Asia.
Resources are reported as lithium metal. • Resources have been categorized subject to the opinion of a QP based on the amount/robustness of informing data for the estimate, consistency of geological/grade distribution, survey information. • Resources have been calculated using drainable porosity estimated from measured values in Upper Halite and Volcano-sedimentary units, and bibliographical values based on the lithology and QP’s experience in similar deposits. • The following assumptions were used in developing the 2025 resource model: ◦ The estimated economic cut-off grade utilized for resource reporting purposes is 1,138 mg/l lithium, based on the following assumptions: ◦ A technical grade lithium carbonate price of $18,000/metric tonne CIF Asia.
We believe that our production facilities, research and development facilities, and sales and administrative offices are generally well maintained, effectively used and are adequate to operate our business. During 2024, the Company’s manufacturing plants operated at approximately 78% capacity, in the aggregate. Set forth below is information regarding our production facilities operated by us and our affiliates.
We believe that our production facilities, research and development facilities, and sales and administrative offices are generally well maintained, effectively used and are adequate to operate our business. During 2025, the Company’s manufacturing plants operated at approximately 81% capacity, in the aggregate. Set forth below is information regarding our production facilities operated by us and our affiliates.
An additional recovery factor of 80% lithium recovery is applied to the La Negra lithium carbonate plant. ◦ An average annual brine pumping rate of 368 L/s is assumed to meet drawdown constraint consistent with Albemarle’s early warning plan. ◦ Operating cost estimates are based on a combination of fixed brine extraction, general and administrative, and plant costs and variable costs associated with raw brine pumping rate or lithium production rate.
An additional recovery factor of 80% lithium recovery is applied to the La Negra lithium carbonate plant. ◦ An average life of mine annual brine pumping rate of 230 L/s is assumed to meet drawdown constraint consistent with activation of Albemarle’s early warning plan. ◦ Operating cost estimates are based on a combination of fixed brine extraction, general and administrative, and plant costs and variable costs associated with raw brine pumping rate or lithium production rate.
As of December 31, 2024, the combined gross asset value of our facilities at the Salar de Atacama and in La Negra, Chile (not inclusive of construction in process) was approximately $2.1 billion. A summary of the Salar de Atacama facility’s lithium mineral resources, exclusive of reserves, and reserves as of December 31, 2024 are shown in the following tables.
As of December 31, 2025, the combined gross asset value of our facilities at the Salar de Atacama and in La Negra, Chile (not inclusive of construction in process) was approximately $2.4 billion. A summary of the Salar de Atacama facility’s lithium mineral resources, exclusive of reserves, and reserves as of December 31, 2025 are shown in the following tables.
As such, there are no specific resources owned by JBC, but Albemarle’s joint venture partner, Arab Potash Company (“APC”) has exclusive rights granted by the Hashemite 35 Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries Kingdom of Jordan to withdraw brine from the Dead Sea and process it to extract minerals.
As such, there are no specific resources owned by JBC, but Albemarle’s joint venture partner, Arab Potash Company (“APC”) has exclusive rights granted by the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan to withdraw brine from the Dead Sea and process it to extract minerals.
The QP and management agree on the reasonableness of the criteria for the purposes of estimating resources and reserves. Calculations using these criteria are reviewed and validated by the QP. Estimations and assumptions were developed independently for each significant mineral location. All estimates require a combination of historical data and key assumptions and parameters.
The QP and management agree on the reasonableness of the criteria for the purposes of estimating resources and reserves. Calculations using these criteria are reviewed and validated by the QP. 37 Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries Estimations and assumptions were developed independently for each significant mineral location. All estimates require a combination of historical data and key assumptions and parameters.
There is an estimated 666 million tonnes of bromine in the Dead Sea. Mining methods consist of all activities necessary to extract brine from the Dead Sea and extract Bromine. The low rainfall, low humidity and high temperatures in the Dead Sea area provide ideal conditions for recovering potash from the brine by solar evaporation.
There is an estimated 666 million tonnes of bromine in the Dead Sea. 51 Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries Mining methods consist of all activities necessary to extract brine from the Dead Sea and extract Bromine. The low rainfall, low humidity and high temperatures in the Dead Sea area provide ideal conditions for recovering potash from the brine by solar evaporation.
Overview 33 Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries At December 31, 2024, we had the following mineral extraction sites: Location Business Segment Ownership % Extraction Type Stage Argentina Antofalla Energy Storage 100% Brine Exploration Australia Greenbushes Energy Storage 49% Hard rock Production Wodgina (a) Energy Storage 50% Hard rock Production Chile Salar de Atacama (b) Energy Storage 100% Brine Production Jordan Safi (b) Specialties 50% Brine Production United States Kings Mountain, NC Energy Storage 100% Hard rock Exploration Magnolia, AR (b) Specialties 100% Brine Production Silver Peak, NV (b) Energy Storage 100% Brine Production (a) Production of spodumene concentrate at the Wodgina mine resumed in the second quarter of 2022 after it had been idled in 2019, following the acquisition of our interest in Wodgina.
Overview At December 31, 2025, we had the following mineral extraction sites: Location Business Segment Ownership % Extraction Type Stage Argentina Antofalla Energy Storage 100% Brine Exploration Australia Greenbushes Energy Storage 49% Hard rock Production Wodgina (a) Energy Storage 50% Hard rock Production Chile Salar de Atacama (b) Energy Storage 100% Brine Production Jordan Safi (b) Specialties 50% Brine Production United States Kings Mountain, NC Energy Storage 100% Hard rock Exploration Magnolia, AR (b) Specialties 100% Brine Production Silver Peak, NV (b) Energy Storage 100% Brine Production (a) Production of spodumene concentrate at the Wodgina mine resumed in the second quarter of 2022 after it had been idled in 2019, following the acquisition of our interest in Wodgina.
For chemical grade plant 2 and chemical grade plant 3, the formula is mass yield % = (9.362 × Feed Li2O%^1.319) + (Feed Li2O% × 0.82).
For chemical grade plant 1, the formula is mass yield % = 9.362 × Feed Li2O%^1.319. For chemical grade plant 2 and chemical grade plant 3, the formula is mass yield % = (9.362 × Feed Li2O%^1.319) + (Feed Li2O% × 0.57).
These reserves represent the first 24 months of feed to the lithium process plant in the 2024 economic model. • Proven reserves have been estimated as the lithium mass pumped from the existing wells from 2025 through 2031 of the proposed life of mine plan. • Probable reserves have been estimated as the lithium mass pumped from existing wells from 2032 and all new proposed production wells from installation until the end of the proposed life of mine plan (2053). • The ratio of in situ Proven to Probable reserves has remained consistent through depletion since the development of the reserve model in 2024, with approximately 16% of the reserve designated as proven and 84% of the reserve designated as probable. • Reserves are reported as lithium metal on a 100% ownership basis. • This mineral reserve estimate was derived based on a production pumping plan truncated at the end of 2053 (i.e., approximately 29 years).
These reserves represent the first 24 months of feed to the lithium process plant. • Proven reserves have been estimated as the lithium mass pumped from the existing wells from 2026 through the first half of 2032 of the proposed life of mine plan. • Probable reserves have been estimated as the lithium mass pumped from existing wells from the second half of 2032 and all new proposed production wells from installation until the end of the proposed life of mine plan (2053). • The ratio of in situ Proven to Probable reserves has remained consistent through depletion since the development of the reserve model in 2024, with approximately 16% of the reserve designated as proven and 84% of the reserve designated as probable. • Reserves are reported as lithium metal on a 100% ownership basis. • This mineral reserve estimate was derived based on a production pumping plan truncated at the end of 2053 (i.e., approximately 28 years).
Conversion to LCE is 0.1878 metric tonne of lithium metal to 1 metric tonne of LCE. (b) Production from Greenbushes represents 49% of production of the Greenbushes mine, which is attributable to the Company’s interest in the Windfield joint venture.
Conversion to lithium carbonate equivalent (“LCE”) is 0.1878 metric tonne of lithium metal to 1 metric tonne of LCE. (b) Production from Greenbushes represents 49% of production of the Greenbushes mine, which is attributable to the Company’s interest in the Windfield joint venture.
Our mineral resource and reserve estimates are based on many factors, including the area and volume 36 Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries covered by our mining rights, assumptions regarding our extraction rates based upon an expectation of operating the mines on a long-term basis and the quality of in-place reserves.
Our mineral resource and reserve estimates are based on many factors, including the area and volume covered by our mining rights, assumptions regarding our extraction rates based upon an expectation of operating the mines on a long-term basis and the quality of in-place reserves.
The tailings storage facility formula is mass yield % = 41.4 and the TRP formula is mass yield % = 13.6. • Costs estimated in Australian Dollars were converted to U.S. dollars based on an exchange rate of AUD 1.00:$0.68. • Waste tonnage within the Mineral Reserve pit is 748.9 million metric tonnes at a strip ratio of 6.3:1 (waste to ore – not including stockpiles). • Mineral reserve tonnage, grade and mass yield have been rounded to reflect the accuracy of the estimate, and numbers may not add due to rounding.
The tailings storage facility formula is mass yield % = 41.4 and the TRP formula is mass yield % = 9.7. • Costs estimated in Australian Dollars were converted to U.S. dollars based on an exchange rate of AUD 1.00:$0.66. • Waste tonnage within the Mineral Reserve pit is 687.0 million metric tonnes at a strip ratio of 4.3:1 (waste to ore – not including stockpiles). • Mineral reserve tonnage, grade and mass yield have been rounded to reflect the accuracy of the estimate, and numbers may not add due to rounding.
Mineral reserve - an estimate of tonnage and grade or quality of indicated and measured mineral resources that, in the opinion of the qualified person , can be the basis of an economically viable project. 32 Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries Proven mineral reserve - the economically mineable part of a measured mineral resource and can only result from conversion of a measured mineral resource .
Mineral reserve - an estimate of tonnage and grade or quality of indicated and measured mineral resources that, in the opinion of the qualified person , can be the basis of an economically viable project. Proven mineral reserve - the economically mineable part of a measured mineral resource and can only result from conversion of a measured mineral resource .
Amounts represent Albemarle’s attributable portion based on ownership percentages noted above and are shown in thousands of metric tonnes of lithium metal and bromine production. Lithium and bromine are extracted as brine or hard rock concentrate at the extraction facilities.
Amounts represent Albemarle’s attributable portion based on ownership percentages noted above and are shown in thousands of metric tonnes of 34 Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries lithium metal and bromine production. Lithium and bromine are extracted as brine or hard rock concentrate at the extraction facilities.
After that point, evaporation pond recovery remains relatively constant at 60%, An additional recovery factor of 80% lithium recovery is applied to the La Negra lithium carbonate plant. ◦ An average annual brine pumping rate of 368 L/s is assumed to meet drawdown constraint with activation of Albemarle’s early warning plan. ◦ Operating cost estimates are based on a combination of fixed brine extraction, general and administrative, and plant costs and variable costs associated with raw brine pumping rate or lithium production rate.
After that point, evaporation pond recovery remains relatively constant at 60%, An additional recovery factor of 80% lithium recovery is applied to the La Negra lithium carbonate plant. ◦ A life of mine average annual brine pumping rate of 230 L/s is assumed to be constraint with activation of Albemarle’s early warning plan. ◦ Operating cost estimates are based on a combination of fixed brine extraction, general and administrative, and plant costs and variable costs associated with raw brine pumping rate or lithium production rate.
All lithium mining activities, including tailings storage, processing plant operations, open pits 38 Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries and waste rock dumps, are currently carried out within the boundaries of the three mining leases plus two general purpose leases.
All lithium mining activities, including tailings storage, processing plant operations, open pits and waste rock dumps, are currently carried out within the boundaries of the three mining leases plus two general purpose leases.
The total mining recoveries are 91.1% for the open cut pit and 100% for the tailings storage facilities. • Mineral resources were converted to mineral reserves using plant recovery equations, sourced from the Company and based on plant data.
The total mining recoveries are 91.7% for the open cut pit and 100% for the tailings storage facilities. • Mineral resources were converted to mineral reserves using plant recovery equations, sourced from MRL and based on plant data.
These reserves represent the first 24 months of feed to the lithium process plant in the 2024 economic model. • Proven reserves have been estimated as the lithium mass pumped during Years 2024 through mid-2035 of the proposed life of mine plan maintaining 10.5 years of proven reserve. • Probable reserves have been estimated as the lithium mass pumped from mid-2035 until the end of the proposed life of mine plan (2041). • The ratio of in situ proven to probable reserves has remained consistent through depletion since the development of the reserve model in 2024 with approximately 65% of the reserve designated as proven and 35% of the reserve designated as probable. • Reserves are reported as lithium metal on a 100% ownership basis. • This mineral reserve estimate was derived based on a production pumping plan truncated in September 2041 (i.e., approximately 16.75 years).
These reserves represent the first 24 months of feed to the lithium process plant in the 2024 economic model. • Proven reserves have been estimated as the lithium mass pumped during 2026 through mid-2036 of the proposed life of mine plan maintaining 10.5 years of proven reserve. • Probable reserves have been estimated as the lithium mass pumped from mid-2036 until the end of the proposed life of mine plan (2041). • The ratio of in situ proven to probable reserves has remained consistent through depletion since the development of the reserve model in 2025 with approximately 58% of the reserve designated as proven and 42% of the reserve designated as probable. • Reserves are reported as lithium metal on a 100% ownership basis. • This mineral reserve estimate was derived based on a production pumping plan truncated in September 2041 (i.e., approximately 15.75 years).
See risk factor - “Our inability to acquire or develop additional reserves that are economically viable could have a material adverse effect on our future profitability,” in Item 1A. Risk Factors.
See risk factor - “Our inability to develop lithium or bromine reserves that are economically viable could have a material adverse effect on our future profitability,” in Item 1A. Risk Factors.
A copy of the QP’s most recent technical report summary with respect to the lithium mineral resource estimates at the Wodgina facility, dated February 10, 2025, with an effective date of June 30, 2024, is filed as Exhibit 96.2 to this report. The mineral resource economic assumptions remain unchanged from June 30, 2024.
A copy of the QP’s most recent technical report summary with respect to the lithium mineral resource and reserve estimates at the Wodgina facility, dated February 11, 2026, with an effective date of June 30, 2025, is filed as Exhibit 96.2 to this report. Economic assumptions remain unchanged from June 30, 2025.
Incremental ore mining costs are the costs associated with the run-of-mine loader, stockpile rehandling, grade control assays and rockbreaker. • The price, cost and mass yield parameters produce a calculated economic cut-off grade of 0.75% Li2O. • Waste tonnage within the Mineral Reserve pit is 748.9 million metric tonnes at a strip ratio of 6.3:1 (waste to ore – not including stockpiles). • Mineral reserve tonnage, grade and mass yield have been rounded to reflect the accuracy of the estimate, and numbers may not add due to rounding.
Incremental ore mining costs are the costs associated with the run-of-mine loader, stockpile rehandling, grade control assays and rockbreaker. • The price, cost and mass yield parameters produce a calculated economic cut-off grade of • Waste tonnage within the Mineral Reserve pit is 356.8 million metric tonnes at a strip ratio of 3.4:1 (waste to ore – not including stockpiles). • Mineral reserve tonnage, grade and mass yield have been rounded to reflect the accuracy of the estimate, and numbers may not add due to rounding.
Other planned upgrades to the infrastructure include a new mine service area, a new mine access road, expansions of warehouse and laboratories and the expansion of tailings facilities. Talison ships the chemical-grade lithium concentrate in vessels to our facilities in Meishan, Qinzhou and Xinyu, China, and by land transport to our Kemerton, Australia facility, to process into battery-grade lithium hydroxide.
Other planned upgrades to the infrastructure include a new mine service area, a new mine access road, expansions of warehouse and laboratories and the expansion of tailings facilities. Talison ships the chemical-grade lithium concentrate in vessels to our facilities in Meishan, Qinzhou and Xinyu, China to process into battery-grade lithium hydroxide.
The measured resource of bromide ion attributable to Albemarle’s 50% interest in its JBC joint venture is estimated to be approximately 173.93 million metric tonnes. JBC is extracting approximately 1 percent of the bromine available in Jordan’s share of the Dead Sea. Bromide concentration in the Dead Sea is estimated to average approximately 5,037 parts per million (“ppm”).
The measured resource of bromide ion attributable to Albemarle’s 50% interest in its JBC joint venture is estimated to be 162.43 million metric tonnes. JBC is extracting approximately 1 percent of the bromine available in Jordan’s share of the Dead Sea. Bromide concentration in the Dead Sea is estimated to average 5,000 parts per million (“ppm”).
The June 30, 2024 resource has been depleted for actual production and is reported as of December 31, 2024 in the below table. The amounts represent Albemarle’s attributable portion based on a 100% ownership percentage, and are presented as metric tonnes of lithium metal in thousands.
The June 30, 2024 resources and reserves have been depleted for actual production and is reported as of December 31, 2025 in the below table. The amounts represent Albemarle’s attributable portion based on a 100% ownership percentage, and are presented as metric tonnes of lithium metal in thousands.
In addition, the output from Talison can be used by tolling entities in China to produce both lithium carbonate and lithium hydroxide. A summary of the Greenbushes facility’s lithium mineral resources, exclusive of reserves, and reserves as of December 31, 2024 is shown in the following tables. RPM Global USA Inc.
In addition, the output from Talison can be used by tolling entities in China to produce both lithium carbonate and lithium hydroxide. A summary of the Greenbushes facility’s lithium mineral resources, exclusive of reserves, and reserves as of December 31, 2025 is shown in the following tables.
This is an 18% premium to the price utilized for reserve reporting purposes.
This is an 13% premium to the price utilized for reserve reporting purposes.
Average life of mine operating cost is calculated at approximately $5,334/metric tonne CIF Asia. ◦ Sustaining capital costs are included in the cut-off grade calculation and post the salar yield improvement program installation average around $110 million per year. ◦ Royalties are included in the cut-off grade calculation and average approximately $4,172/metric tonne of lithium carbonate produced. • Mineral resources tonnage and contained metal have been rounded to reflect the accuracy of the estimate, and numbers may not add due to rounding.
Average life of mine operating cost is calculated at approximately $6,742/metric tonne CIF Asia. ◦ Sustaining capital costs are included in the cut-off grade calculation and post the Salar yield improvement program installation average around $100 million per year. ◦ Royalties are included in the cut-off grade calculation and average approximately $1,807/metric tonne of lithium carbonate produced. • Mineral resources tonnage and contained metal have been rounded to reflect the accuracy of the estimate, and numbers may not add due to rounding.
Average life of mine operating cost is calculated at approximately $5,334/metric tonne CIF Asia. ◦ Sustaining capital costs are included in the cut-off grade calculation and post the salar yield improvement program installation, average around $110 million per year. ◦ Royalties are included in the cut-off grade calculation and average approximately $4,172/metric tonne of lithium carbonate produced. • Mineral reserve tonnage, grade and mass yield have been rounded to reflect the accuracy of the estimate and numbers may not add due to rounding.
Average life of mine operating cost is calculated at approximately $6,742/metric tonne CIF Asia. ◦ Sustaining capital costs are included in the cut-off grade calculation and post the Salar yield improvement program installation, average around $100 million per year. ◦ Royalties are included in the cut-off grade calculation and average approximately $1,807/metric tonne of lithium carbonate produced. • Mineral reserve tonnage, grade and mass yield have been rounded to reflect the accuracy of the estimate and numbers may not add due to rounding.
As of December 31, 2024, the gross asset value of our facilities at our Silver Peak site was approximately $191.9 million. A summary of the Silver Peak facility’s lithium mineral resources, exclusive of reserves, and reserves as of December 31, 2024 is shown in the following tables.
As of December 31, 2025, the gross asset value of our facilities at our Silver Peak site was approximately $219.7 million. A summary of the Silver Peak facility’s lithium mineral resources, exclusive of reserves, and reserves as of December 31, 2025 is shown in the following tables.
As of December 31, 2024, our 50% ownership interest of the gross asset value of the facilities at the Safi, Jordan site was approximately $261.2 million. A summary of the Safi facility’s bromine mineral resources and reserves as of December 31, 2024 is provided below.
As of December 31, 2025, our 50% ownership interest of the gross asset value of the facilities at the Safi, Jordan site was approximately $280.0 million. A summary of the Safi facility’s bromine mineral resources and reserves as of December 31, 2025 is provided below.
The June 30, 2024 resource has been depleted for actual production and is reported as of December 31, 2024 in the below table. The amounts represent Albemarle’s attributable portion based on a 100% ownership percentage, and are presented as metric tonnes of lithium metal in thousands.
The June 30, 2025 resources and reserves have been depleted for actual production and is reported as of December 31, 2025 in the below table. The amounts represent Albemarle’s attributable portion based on a 100% ownership percentage, and are presented as metric tonnes of lithium metal in thousands.
The Silver Peak reserve estimates with depletion from production from the effective date of the report through December 31, 2024 are summarized in the following table: Amount (‘000s metric tonnes) Concentration (mg/L) Proven mineral reserves: In Situ 12 97 In Process 1 101 Probable mineral reserves: In Situ 66 119 Total mineral reserves: In Situ 78 115 In Process 1 101 • In process reserves quantify the prior 24 months of pumping data and reflect the raw brine at the time of pumping.
The Silver Peak reserve estimates with depletion from production from the effective date of the report through December 31, 2025 are summarized in the following table: Amount (‘000s metric tonnes) Concentration (mg/L) Proven mineral reserves: In Situ 12 96 In Process 1 104 Probable mineral reserves: In Situ 64 119 Total mineral reserves: In Situ 76 115 In Process 1 104 • In process reserves quantify the prior 24 months of pumping data and reflect the raw brine at the time of pumping.
The Wodgina mineral reserve estimates with depletion from production from the effective date of the report through December 31, 2024 are summarized in the following table: 42 Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries Amount (‘000s metric tonnes) Grade (Li 2 O%) Probable mineral reserves: Open Cut 48,500 1.4% Stockpiles 50 1.5% Tailings Storage Facilities 7,400 1.0% • Amounts represent Albemarle’s attributable portion of mineral resources and mineral reserves of 50%. • Mineral reserves are reported exclusive of mineral resources. • Mineral reserves are reported on a dry basis • Mineral reserves are reported considering a nominal set of assumptions for reporting purposes: • Based on a selling price of $1,300/metric tonne CIF CKJ of chemical grade concentrate (benchmark 6% Li2O) and concentrate transport and selling cost of $6.80/metric tonne. • Assumes a 98% global grade factor. • Assumes variable mining recoveries based on grade, oxidation, thickness, and search distance, sourced from the Company.
The Wodgina mineral reserve estimates with depletion from production from the effective date of the report through December 31, 2025 are summarized in the following table: Amount (‘000s metric tonnes) Grade (Li 2 O%) Probable mineral reserves: Open Cut 43,200 1.4% Stockpiles 500 0.8% Tailings Storage Facilities 7,400 1.0% • Amounts represent Albemarle’s attributable portion of mineral resources and mineral reserves of 50%. • Mineral reserves are reported exclusive of mineral resources. • Mineral reserves are reported on a dry basis • Mineral reserves are reported considering a nominal set of assumptions for reporting purposes: • Based on a selling price of $1,300/metric tonne CIF CKJ of chemical grade concentrate (benchmark 6% Li2O). • Assumes variable mining recoveries based on grade, oxidation, thickness, and search distance, sourced from MRL.
This plan was truncated to reflect the termination date of Albemarle’s authorized brine extraction from the salar. • The 2024 reserve model used as the basis for depletion has not been updated. The following assumptions were used in developing that model: ◦ The estimated economic cut-off grade for the project is 1,073 mg/l lithium, based on the assumptions discussed below.
This plan was truncated to reflect the termination date of Albemarle’s authorized lithium production quota. • The 2025 reserve model used as the basis for depletion has not been updated. The following assumptions were used in developing that model: ◦ The estimated economic cut-off grade for the project is 1,348 mg/l lithium, based on the assumptions discussed below.
The Wodgina mineral resources, exclusive of reserves, estimates with depletion from production from the effective date of the report through December 31, 2024 are summarized in the following table: Amount (‘000s metric tonnes) Grade (Li 2 O%) Indicated mineral resources 23,300 0.8% Inferred mineral resources 14,500 1.1% • Amounts represent Albemarle’s attributable portion of mineral resources of 50%. • Mineral resources are reported exclusive of mineral reserves.
The Wodgina mineral resources, exclusive of reserves, estimates with depletion from production from the effective date of the report through December 31, 2025 are summarized in the following table: Amount (‘000s metric tonnes) Grade (Li 2 O%) Indicated mineral resources 23,600 1.0% Inferred mineral resources 15,100 1.3% • Amounts represent Albemarle’s attributable portion of mineral resources of 50%. • Mineral resources are reported exclusive of mineral reserves.
The bromide ion concentration in the brine extracted which feeds the bromine plants, significantly exceeds the selected cut-off grade. The Safi measured mineral resources of 173.93 million metric tonnes of bromide ion at December 31, 2024 decreased by 1% from 175.69 million metric tonnes at December 31, 2023.
The bromide ion concentration in the brine extracted which feeds the bromine plants, significantly exceeds the selected cut-off grade. The Safi measured mineral resources of 162.43 million metric tonnes of bromide ion at December 31, 2025 decreased by 5% from 173.93 million metric tonnes at December 31, 2024.
Mineral reserves metric tonnes are rounded to the nearest hundred thousand tonnes. The Greenbushes total mineral reserves of 74.5 million metric tonnes at December 31, 2024 increased by 4% from 71.8 million metric tonnes at December 31, 2023.
Mineral reserves metric tonnes are rounded to the nearest hundred thousand tonnes. The Greenbushes total mineral reserves of 79.8 million metric tonnes at December 31, 2025 increased by 7% from 74.5 million metric tonnes at December 31, 2024.
A copy of the QP’s most recent technical report summary with respect to the lithium mineral resource and reserve estimates at the Greenbushes facility, dated February 10, 2025, with an effective date of June 30, 2024, is filed as Exhibit 96.1 to this report.
A copy of the QP’s most recent technical report summary with respect to the lithium mineral resource and reserve estimates at the Greenbushes facility, dated February 11, 2026, with an effective date of June 30, 2025, is filed as Exhibit 96.1 to this report. Economic assumptions remain unchanged from June 30, 2025.
Location Principal Use Owned/Leased Energy Storage Chengdu, China Production of technical and battery-grade lithium hydroxide Owned Greenbushes, Australia (a) Production of lithium spodumene minerals and lithium concentrate Owned (c) Kemerton, Australia Production of technical and battery-grade lithium hydroxide Owned Kings Mountain, NC Production of technical and battery-grade lithium hydroxide, lithium salts and battery-grade lithium metal products Owned La Negra, Chile Production of technical and battery-grade lithium carbonate Owned Meishan, China Production of technical and battery-grade lithium hydroxide Owned Qinzhou, China Production of lithium carbonate and technical and battery-grade lithium hydroxide Owned 31 Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries Location Principal Use Owned/Leased Salar de Atacama, Chile (a) Production of lithium brine and potash Owned (d) Silver Peak, NV (a) Production of lithium brine, technical-grade lithium carbonate and lithium hydroxide Owned Wodgina, Australia (a) Production of lithium spodumene minerals and lithium concentrate Owned and leased (c) Xinyu, China Production of technical and battery-grade lithium hydroxide Owned Specialties Baton Rouge, LA Research and product development activities, and production of fire safety solutions Leased Langelsheim, Germany Production of butyllithium, lithium chloride, specialty products, lithium hydrides, cesium and special metals Owned Magnolia, AR (a) Production of fire safety solutions, bromine, inorganic bromides, agricultural intermediates and tertiary amines Owned New Johnsonville, TN Production of butyllithium and specialty products Owned Safi, Jordan (a) Production of bromine and derivatives and fire safety solutions Owned and leased (c) Taichung, Taiwan Production of butyllithium Owned Twinsburg, OH Production of bromine-activated carbon Leased Ketjen (b) Amsterdam, the Netherlands Production of refinery catalysts, research and product development activities Owned Bayport, TX Production of refinery catalysts, research and product development activities Owned Niihama, Japan Production of refinery catalysts Leased (c) Pasadena, TX Production of variety of chemical products, including aluminum and magnesium alkyls and alkyltes Owned Santa Cruz, Brazil Production of catalysts, research and product development activities Owned (c) (a) See below for further discussion of these significant mineral extraction facilities.
Location Principal Use Owned/Leased Energy Storage Chengdu, China (a) Production of technical and battery-grade lithium hydroxide Owned Greenbushes, Australia (b) Production of lithium spodumene minerals and lithium concentrate Owned (e) Kemerton, Australia (c) Production of technical and battery-grade lithium hydroxide Owned Kings Mountain, NC Production of technical and battery-grade lithium hydroxide, lithium salts and battery-grade lithium metal products Owned La Negra, Chile Production of technical and battery-grade lithium carbonate Owned Meishan, China Production of technical and battery-grade lithium hydroxide Owned Qinzhou, China Production of lithium carbonate and technical and battery-grade lithium hydroxide Owned Salar de Atacama, Chile (b) Production of lithium brine and potash Owned (f) Silver Peak, NV (b) Production of lithium brine, technical-grade lithium carbonate and lithium hydroxide Owned Wodgina, Australia (b) Production of lithium spodumene minerals and lithium concentrate Owned and leased (e) Xinyu, China Production of technical and battery-grade lithium hydroxide Owned Specialties Baton Rouge, LA Research and product development activities, and production of fire safety solutions Leased Langelsheim, Germany Production of butyllithium, lithium chloride, specialty products, lithium hydrides, cesium and special metals Owned Magnolia, AR (b) Production of fire safety solutions, bromine, inorganic bromides, agricultural intermediates and tertiary amines Owned New Johnsonville, TN Production of butyllithium and specialty products Owned Safi, Jordan (b) Production of bromine and derivatives and fire safety solutions Owned and leased (e) Taichung, Taiwan Production of butyllithium Owned Ketjen (d) Amsterdam, the Netherlands Production of refinery catalysts, research and product development activities Owned Bayport, TX Production of refinery catalysts, research and product development activities Owned Niihama, Japan Production of refinery catalysts Leased (e) 32 Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries Location Principal Use Owned/Leased Pasadena, TX Production of variety of chemical products, including aluminum and magnesium alkyls and alkyltes Owned Santa Cruz, Brazil Production of catalysts, research and product development activities Owned (e) (a) The Chengdu, China conversion facility was placed into care and maintenance during 2025.
The truncated production pumping plan remained well above the economic cut-off grade (i.e., the economic cut-off grade did not result in a limiting factor to the estimation of the reserve). ◦ A technical grade lithium carbonate price of $17,000/metric tonne CIF Asia. ◦ Recovery factors for the salar operation increase gradually over the span of 4 years, from the current 40% to the proposed salar yield improvement program 60% recovery in 2027.
The truncated production pumping plan remained well above the economic cut-off grade (i.e., the economic cut-off grade did not result in a limiting factor to the estimation of the reserve). ◦ A technical grade lithium carbonate price of $16,000/metric tonne CIF Asia. ◦ Recovery factors for the Salar operation are applied in the year the brine is pumped and increase gradually over the span of 3 years, from the current 43% to the proposed Salar yield improvement program 60% recovery in 2027.
The Greenbushes mineral resources, exclusive of reserves, estimates with depletion from production from the effective date of the report through December 31, 2024 are summarized in the following table: Amount (‘000s metric tonnes) Grade (Li 2 O%) Indicated mineral resources 37,500 1.5% Inferred mineral resources 8,200 1.7% • Amounts represent Albemarle’s attributable portion of mineral resources of 49%. • Mineral resources are reported exclusive of mineral reserves.
The Greenbushes mineral resources, exclusive of reserves, estimates with depletion from production from the effective date of the report through December 31, 2025 are summarized in the following table: Amount (‘000s metric tonnes) Grade (Li 2 O%) Indicated mineral resources 62,500 1.2% Inferred mineral resources 43,100 1.6% • Amounts represent Albemarle’s attributable portion of mineral resources of 49%. • Mineral resources are reported exclusive of mineral reserves.
(“RPM”), a third-party firm comprising mining experts in accordance with Item 1302(b)(1) of Regulation S-K, served as the QP and prepared the estimates of lithium mineral resources and reserves at the Greenbushes facility, with an effective date of June 30, 2024.
SLR International Corporation (“SLR”), a third-party firm comprising mining experts 39 Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries in accordance with Item 1302(b)(1) of Regulation S-K, served as the QP and prepared the estimates of lithium mineral resources and reserves at the Greenbushes facility, with an effective date of June 30, 2025.
RPS Energy Canada Ltd (“RPS”), a third-party firm comprising mining experts in accordance with Item 1302(b)(1) of Regulation S-K, served as the QP and prepared the estimates of bromine mineral resources and reserves at the Safi facility, with an effective date of December 31, 2024.
RESPEC Consulting Inc., a third-party firm comprising mining experts in accordance with Item 1302(b)(1) of Regulation S-K, served as the QP and prepared the estimates of bromine mineral resources and reserves at the Safi facility, with an effective date of December 31, 2025.
The bromine concentration is more than twice as high as that found in normal evaporated seawater. The bromine mineralization of the brine is distributed throughout the porous intervals of the upper and middle Smackover on the property.
The bromine concentration is more than twice as high as that found in normal evaporated seawater. The bromine mineralization of the brine is distributed throughout the porous intervals of the upper and middle Smackover on the property. The strong permeability and porosity of the Smackover grainstones provide excellent continuity of the bromine mineralization within the brine.
The Greenbushes indicated mineral resources of 37.6 million metric tonnes at December 31, 2024 increased by 1% from 37.1 million metric tonnes at December 31, 2023. The Greenbushes inferred mineral resources of 8.2 million metric tonnes at December 31, 2024 increased by 41% from 5.8 million metric tonnes at December 31, 2023.
The Greenbushes indicated mineral resources of 62.5 million metric tonnes at December 31, 2025 increased by 66% from 37.6 million metric tonnes at December 31, 2024. The Greenbushes inferred mineral resources of 43.1 million metric tonnes at December 31, 2025 increased by 426% from 8.2 million metric tonnes at December 31, 2024.
The Salar de Atacama total mineral reserves of 458,000 metric tonnes at December 31, 2024 decreased by 14% from 531,000 metric tonnes at December 31, 2023.
The Salar de Atacama total mineral reserves of 308,000 metric tonnes at December 31, 2025 decreased by 33% from 458,000 metric tonnes at December 31, 2024.
Amount (‘000s metric tonnes) Proven mineral reserves 2,468 Probable mineral reserves 467 Total mineral reserves 2,935 • Reserves are reported as bromine, on an in situ basis. • The estimated economic cut-off grade utilized for reserve reporting purposes is 1,000 mg/L bromine, with a bromine price ranging from $1,660 to $3,020 per metric tonne and operating costs ranging from $756 to $1,094 per metric tonne. • Recovery factors for the Magnolia are 82% and 88% for the proven mineral reserves and total mineral reserves, respectively. • The concentration of bromine at the Magnolia site varies based on the physical location of the field and can range up to over 6,600 mg/L.
Amount (‘000s metric tonnes) Proven mineral reserves 2,264 Probable mineral reserves 395 Total mineral reserves 2,658 • Reserves are reported as bromine, on an in situ basis. • The estimated economic cut-off grade utilized for reserve reporting purposes is 1,000 mg/L bromine, with a bromine price ranging from $2,690 to $4,890 per metric tonne and operating costs ranging from $1,460 to $2,136 per metric tonne. • Recovery factors for the Magnolia operation are 79% and 84% for the proven mineral reserves and total mineral reserves, respectively. • The concentration of bromine at the Magnolia site varies based on the physical location of the field and can range up to over 6,600 mg/L.
The 18% premium applied to the resource versus the reserve was selected to generate a resource larger than the reserve, ensuring the resource fully encompassed the reserve while still maintaining reasonable prospect for economic extraction. ◦ Recovery factors for the salar operation increase gradually over the span of 4 years, from the current 40% to the proposed salar yield improvement program 60% recovery in 2027.
The 13% premium applied to the resource versus the reserve was selected to generate a resource larger than the reserve, ensuring the resource fully encompassed the reserve while still maintaining reasonable prospect for economic extraction. ◦ Recovery factors for the salar operation are applied in the year in which the brine is pumped and increase gradually over the span of 3 year, from the current 43% to the proposed Salar yield improvement program 60% recovery in 2027.
The plant processing recovery equations depend on the material type, weathering, and in some circumstances, the Li2O% grade of the plant feed. • Costs estimated in Australian Dollars were converted to U.S. dollars based on an exchange rate of AUD 1.00:$0.68. • The economic cut-off grade calculation is based on $2.80/metric tonne-ore incremental ore mining cost, $33.57/metric tonne-ore processing cost, $15.66/metric tonne-ore general and administrative cost and $3.64/metric tonne sustaining capital cost.
The plant processing recovery equations depend on the material type, weathering, and in some circumstances, the Li2O% grade of the plant feed. • Costs estimated in Australian Dollars were converted to U.S. dollars based on an exchange rate of AUD 1.00:$0.66. • The economic cut-off grade calculation is based on $2.10/metric tonne-ore incremental ore mining cost, $33.63/metric tonne-ore processing cost, $11.79/metric tonne-ore general and administrative cost, $5.73/metric tonne sustaining capital cost and US$53.22/metric tonne-ore selling cost, inclusive of shipping.
APC produces potash from the brine extracted from the Dead Sea. A concentrated bromide-enriched brine extracted from APC’s evaporation ponds is the feed material for the JBC plant. Following the formation of the joint venture, the JBC bromine plant began operations in 2002.
APC produces potash from the brine extracted from the Dead Sea. A concentrated bromide-enriched brine extracted from APC’s evaporation ponds is the feed material for the JBC plant. Following the formation of the joint venture, the JBC bromine plant began operations in 2002. Expansion of the facilities to double its bromine production capacity went into operation in 2017.
The property is accessible via National Highway 1 to National highway 95 to the Wodgina camp road. All roads to site are paved. The nearest large regional airport is in Port Hedland which also hosts an international deep-water port facility. In addition, a site dedicated all-weather airstrip is located near to site, capable of landing certain aircrafts.
The property is accessible via National Highway 1 to National highway 95 to the Wodgina camp road. All roads to site are paved. The nearest large regional airport is in Port Hedland which also hosts an international deep-water port facility.
Revenues are based on a forecast bromine price ranging from $1,661 to $3,020 per metric tonne and the operating cost is approximately $364 per metric tonne . The measured resource of bromide ion attributable to Albemarle’s 50% interest in its JBC joint venture is estimated to be approximately 173.93 million metric tonnes.
Revenues are based on a forecast bromine price ranging from $2,690 to $4,890 per metric tonne and the operating cost is approximately $501 per metric tonne . The measured resource of bromide ion attributable to Albemarle’s 50% interest in its JBC joint venture is estimated to be approximately 162.43 million metric tonnes.
The Salar de Atacama mineral resource, exclusive of reserves, estimates with depletion from production from the effective date of the report to December 31, 2024 are summarized in the following table: 45 Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries Amount (‘000s metric tonnes) Li Concentration (mg/L) Measured mineral resources 618 2,176 Indicated mineral resources 481 1,868 Measured and Indicated mineral resources 1,099 2,041 Inferred mineral resources 166 1,558 • Mineral resources are reported exclusive of mineral reserves.
The Salar de Atacama mineral resource, exclusive of reserves, estimates with depletion from production from the effective date of the report to December 31, 2025 are summarized in the following table: 45 Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries Amount (‘000s metric tonnes) Li Concentration (mg/L) Measured mineral resources 732 2,255 Indicated mineral resources 691 2,042 Measured and Indicated mineral resources 1,422 2,146 Inferred mineral resources 146 1,785 • Mineral resources are reported exclusive of mineral reserves.
As of December 31, 2024, our 50% ownership interest of the gross asset value of the facilities at our Wodgina site was approximately $338.3 million. A summary of the Wodgina facility’s lithium mineral resources as of December 31, 2024 is shown in the following table.
As of December 31, 2025, our 50% ownership interest of the gross asset value of the facilities at our Wodgina site was approximately $414.4 million. A summary of the Wodgina facility’s lithium mineral resources, exclusive of reserves, and reserves as of December 31, 2025 is shown in the following tables.
Aggregate Annual Production (metric tonnes in thousands) Year Ended December 31, 2024 2023 2022 Lithium (lithium metal) (a) Australia Greenbushes (b) 19 21 19 Wodgina (c) 6 7 3 Chile Salar de Atacama (d) 13 10 10 United States Silver Peak, NV 1 1 1 Total lithium metal 39 39 33 Bromine Jordan Safi (e)(f) 56 58 60 United States Magnolia, AR (g) 65 82 73 Total bromine 121 140 133 34 Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries (a) Lithium production amounts shown as lithium metal.
Aggregate Annual Production (metric tonnes in thousands) Year Ended December 31, 2025 2024 2023 Lithium (lithium metal) (a) Australia Greenbushes (b) 19 19 21 Wodgina (c) 8 6 7 Chile Salar de Atacama (d) 14 13 10 United States Silver Peak, NV 1 1 1 Total lithium metal 42 39 39 Bromine Jordan Safi (e)(f) 57 56 58 United States Magnolia, AR (g) 69 65 65 Total bromine 126 121 123 (a) Lithium production amounts shown as lithium metal.
The net increase in total mineral resources was driven by new modeling completed in development of the current technical report summary as well as a decrease in the reserves due to reduced pumping rates imposed by Albemarle’s early warning plan.
The net increase in total mineral resources was driven by new modeling completed in development of the current technical report summary as well as a decrease in the reserves due to reduced pumping rates associated with Albemarle’s early warning plan and the potential expiration of the quota extraction period before the full quota is achieved.