Biggest changeThe Company’s future capital requirements will depend on, and could increase significantly as a result of, many factors, including: ● the enrollment, progress, timing, costs and results of the RewinD-LB Trial and any future phase 3 trial evaluating neflamapimod in DLB, as well as if and when it pursues additional development plans for neflamapimod in other disease indications, such as recovery after anterior circulation ischemic stroke or EOAD; ● the outcome, timing and cost of meeting regulatory requirements established by the FDA and other comparable foreign regulatory authorities; ● its ability to reach certain milestone events set forth in its collaboration agreements and the timing of such achievements, triggering obligations to make applicable payments; ● the hiring of additional clinical, scientific and commercial personnel to pursue the Company’s development plans, as well the increased costs of internal and external resources as to support the Company’s operations as a public reporting company; ● the cost and timing of securing manufacturing arrangements for clinical or commercial production; ● the cost of establishing, either internally or in collaboration with others, sales, marketing and distribution capabilities to commercialize neflamapimod, if approved; ● the cost of filing, prosecuting, enforcing, and defending its patent claims and other intellectual property rights, including defending against any patent infringement actions brought by third parties against the Company; ● the ability to receive additional non-dilutive funding, including the Company’s pending request for additional funding under the NIA Grant and other grants from organizations and foundations; ● the Company’s ability to establish strategic collaborations, licensing or other arrangements with other parties on favorable terms, if at all; and ● the extent to which the Company may in-license or acquire other product candidates or technologies. 46 The Company may raise additional capital in the future through a variety of sources, including public or private equity offerings, debt financings, grant funding, or strategic collaborations and licensing arrangements.
Biggest changeThe Company’s future capital requirements will depend on, and could increase significantly as a result of, many factors, including: ● the enrollment, progress, timing, costs and results of its ongoing and future clinical trials evaluating neflamapimod in DLB and other indications; ● the outcome, timing and cost of meeting regulatory requirements established by the FDA and other comparable foreign regulatory authorities; ● its ability to reach certain milestone events set forth in its collaboration agreements and the timing of such achievements, triggering obligations to make applicable payments; ● the hiring of additional clinical, scientific and commercial personnel to pursue the Company’s development plans, as well the increased costs of internal and external resources as to support the Company’s operations as a public reporting company; ● the cost and timing of securing manufacturing arrangements for clinical or commercial production; ● the cost of establishing, either internally or in collaboration with others, sales, marketing and distribution capabilities to commercialize neflamapimod, if approved; ● the cost of filing, prosecuting, enforcing, and defending its patent claims and other intellectual property rights, including defending against any patent infringement actions brought by third parties against the Company; ● the ability to receive additional non-dilutive funding, including the Company’s remaining funding expected under the NIA Grant and other grants from organizations and foundations; ● the Company’s ability to establish strategic collaborations, licensing or other arrangements with other parties on favorable terms, if at all; and ● the extent to which the Company may in-license or acquire other product candidates or technologies.
These liver enzymes, aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase, are proteins are commonly produced in the liver, the measurements of which can help doctors evaluate liver function.
These liver enzymes, aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase, are proteins commonly produced in the liver, the measurements of which can help doctors evaluate liver function.
If the Company, its vendors, or its third-party partners experience an actual or perceived violation of applicable privacy or data protection laws or regulations, or a cybersecurity incident due to the use of generative artificial intelligence, the Company could be subject to regulatory fines, investigations, enforcement actions, penalties and other liabilities, claims for damages from affected individuals, and the Company may lose valuable intellectual property and confidential information and its reputation and the public perception of the effectiveness of its privacy or cybersecurity measures could be harmed.
If the Company, its vendors, or its third-party partners experience an actual or perceived violation of applicable privacy or data protection, intellectual property, or other laws or regulations, or a cybersecurity incident due to the use of generative artificial intelligence, the Company could be subject to regulatory fines, investigations, enforcement actions, penalties and other liabilities, claims for damages from affected individuals, and the Company may lose valuable intellectual property and confidential information and its reputation and the public perception of the effectiveness of its privacy or cybersecurity measures could be harmed.
Subject enrollment and retention in clinical trials depends on many factors, including: ● the eligibility criteria defined in the protocol; ● the size of the patient population required for analysis of the trial’s primary endpoints; ● the nature of the trial protocol; ● the proximity of potential subjects to clinical sites; ● the existing body of safety and efficacy data with respect to the product candidate; ● the Company’s ability to recruit clinical trial investigators with the appropriate competencies and experience; ● clinicians’ and patients’ perceptions as to the potential advantages of the product candidate being studied in relation to other available therapies; ● competing clinical trials being conducted by other companies or institutions; ● the risk that participants enrolled in clinical trials will drop out of the trials before completion; and ● the operational efficiency of trial sites, including sufficient staffing.
Subject enrollment and retention in clinical trials depends on many factors, including: ● the eligibility criteria defined in the protocol; ● the size of the patient population required for analysis of the trial’s primary endpoints; ● the nature of the trial protocol; ● the proximity of potential subjects to clinical sites; 48 ● the existing body of safety and efficacy data with respect to the product candidate; ● the Company’s ability to recruit clinical trial investigators with the appropriate competencies and experience; ● clinicians’ and patients’ perceptions as to the potential advantages of the product candidate being studied in relation to other available therapies; ● competing clinical trials being conducted by other companies or institutions; ● the risk that participants enrolled in clinical trials will drop out of the trials before completion; and ● the operational efficiency of trial sites, including sufficient staffing.
Among others, restrictions under applicable domestic and foreign healthcare laws and regulations include: ● the U.S. federal AKS, which prohibits, among other things, persons from knowingly and willfully soliciting, offering, receiving or providing remuneration, directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward, or in return for, either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase, order or recommendation of, any good or service, for which payment may be made under a federal healthcare program such as Medicare and Medicaid; ● U.S. federal false claims, false statements and civil monetary penalties laws, including the U.S. federal False Claims Act, which impose criminal and civil penalties against individuals or entities for knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, to the federal government, claims for payment that are false or fraudulent or making a false statement to avoid, decrease or conceal an obligation to pay money to the federal government; ● HIPAA, which imposes (i) criminal and civil liability for executing a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program, or knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false statement in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services and (ii) obligations on certain covered entity healthcare providers, health plans, and healthcare clearinghouses as well as their business associates that perform certain services involving the use or disclosure of individually identifiable health information, including mandatory contractual terms, with respect to safeguarding the privacy, security and transmission of individually identifiable health information; ● analogous state and foreign laws and regulations relating to healthcare fraud and abuse, such as state anti-kickback and false claims laws, which may apply to sales or marketing arrangements and claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed by non-governmental third-party payors, including private insurers; ● the U.S. federal “Physician Payments Sunshine Act”, which requires manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies that are reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid, or the Children’s Health Insurance Program to report to CMS information related to physician payments and other transfers of value to physicians, certain advanced non-physician health care practitioners, and teaching hospitals, as well as the ownership and investment interests of physicians and their immediate family members; ● analogous state and foreign laws that require pharmaceutical companies to track, report and disclose to the government or the public information related to payments, gifts, and other transfers of value or remuneration to physicians and other healthcare providers, marketing activities or expenditures, or product pricing or transparency information, or that require pharmaceutical companies to implement compliance programs that meet certain standards or to restrict or limit interactions between pharmaceutical manufacturers and members of the healthcare industry; ● U.S. federal laws that require pharmaceutical manufacturers to report certain calculated product prices to the government or provide certain discounts or rebates to government authorities or private entities, often as a condition of reimbursement under federal healthcare programs; and ● state and foreign laws that govern the privacy and security of health information in certain circumstances, including state security breach notification laws, state health information privacy laws and federal and state consumer protection laws, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and often are not preempted by HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts. 69 Ensuring business arrangements comply with applicable healthcare laws, as well as responding to possible investigations by government authorities, can be time- and resource-consuming and can divert a company’s attention from the business.
Among others, restrictions under applicable domestic and foreign healthcare laws and regulations include: ● the U.S. federal AKS, which prohibits, among other things, persons from knowingly and willfully soliciting, offering, receiving or providing remuneration, directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward, or in return for, either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase, order or recommendation of, any good or service, for which payment may be made under a federal healthcare program such as Medicare and Medicaid; ● U.S. federal false claims, false statements and civil monetary penalties laws, including the FCA, which impose criminal and civil penalties against individuals or entities for knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, to the federal government, claims for payment that are false or fraudulent or making a false statement to avoid, decrease or conceal an obligation to pay money to the federal government; ● HIPAA, which imposes (i) criminal and civil liability for executing a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program, or knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false statement in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services and (ii) obligations on certain covered entity healthcare providers, health plans, and healthcare clearinghouses as well as their business associates that perform certain services involving the use or disclosure of individually identifiable health information, including mandatory contractual terms, with respect to safeguarding the privacy, security and transmission of individually identifiable health information; ● analogous state and foreign laws and regulations relating to healthcare fraud and abuse, such as state anti-kickback and false claims laws, which may apply to sales or marketing arrangements and claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed by non-governmental third-party payors, including private insurers; ● the U.S. federal “Physician Payments Sunshine Act”, which requires manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies that are reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid, or the Children’s Health Insurance Program to report to CMS information related to physician payments and other transfers of value to physicians, certain advanced non-physician health care practitioners, and teaching hospitals, as well as the ownership and investment interests of physicians and their immediate family members; ● analogous state and foreign laws that require pharmaceutical companies to track, report and disclose to the government or the public information related to payments, gifts, and other transfers of value or remuneration to physicians and other healthcare providers, marketing activities or expenditures, or product pricing or transparency information, or that require pharmaceutical companies to implement compliance programs that meet certain standards or to restrict or limit interactions between pharmaceutical manufacturers and members of the healthcare industry; ● U.S. federal laws that require pharmaceutical manufacturers to report certain calculated product prices to the government or provide certain discounts or rebates to government authorities or private entities, often as a condition of reimbursement under federal healthcare programs; and ● state and foreign laws that govern the privacy and security of health information in certain circumstances, including state security breach notification laws, state health information privacy laws and federal and state consumer protection laws, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and often are not preempted by HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts. 62 Ensuring business arrangements comply with applicable healthcare laws, as well as responding to possible investigations by government authorities, can be time- and resource-consuming and can divert a company’s attention from the business.
In addition, its rationale for neflamapimod in the treatment of DLB is based on a scientific understanding of the disease that may be wrong. ● Enrollment and retention of participants in clinical trials is an expensive and time-consuming process and could be made more difficult or rendered impossible by multiple factors outside the Company’s control. ● Results of preclinical studies and early clinical trials may not be indicative of results obtained in later trials.
In addition, its rationale for neflamapimod in the treatment of DLB is based on a scientific understanding of the disease that may be wrong. ● Enrollment and retention of participants in clinical trials is an expensive and time-consuming process and could be made more difficult or rendered impossible by multiple factors outside the Company’s control. 40 ● Results of preclinical studies and early clinical trials may not be indicative of results obtained in later trials.
Clinical trials may be delayed, suspended or prematurely terminated because costs are greater than the Company anticipates or for a variety of other reasons, such as: ● delay or failure in reaching agreement with the FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority on a trial design that the Company is able to execute; ● delay or failure in obtaining authorization to commence a trial, including approval from the appropriate IRB or ethics committee at each clinical site to conduct testing of a candidate on human subjects, or inability to comply with conditions imposed by a regulatory authority regarding the scope or design of a clinical trial; ● delays in reaching, or failure to reach, agreement on acceptable terms with prospective trial sites and prospective CROs, the terms of which can be subject to extensive negotiation and may vary significantly among different CROs and trial sites; ● inability, delay or failure in identifying and maintaining a sufficient number of trial sites, many of which may already be engaged in other clinical programs; ● inability, delay or failure in identifying, recruiting, and training suitable clinical investigators; ● delay or failure in recruiting, screening, and enrolling suitable subjects to participate in a trial; ● delay or failure in having subjects complete a trial or return for post-treatment follow-up; ● delays caused by operational issues at clinical trial sites, including insufficient staffing; ● changes to the clinical trial protocols and/or changes in regulatory requirements and guidance that require amending or submitting new clinical protocols; ● clinical sites and investigators deviating from the clinical protocol, failing to conduct the trial in accordance with Good Clinical Practices or other regulatory requirements, or dropping out of a trial; ● failure to initiate or delay of or inability to complete a clinical trial as a result of the authorizing IND or foreign clinical trial application being placed on temporary or permanent clinical hold by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authority; ● lack of adequate funding to continue a clinical trial, including as a result of unforeseen costs due to enrollment delays, requirements to conduct additional clinical trials and increased expenses associated with the services of the Company’s CROs and other third parties, or the cost of clinical trials being greater than the Company anticipated; ● delays in manufacturing, testing, releasing, validating or importing/exporting sufficient stable quantities of drug product for use in clinical trials or the inability to do any of the foregoing; ● developments on trials conducted by competitors for related technology that raise FDA or foreign regulatory authority concerns about risk to patients of a technology or in any indication more broadly; ● clinical trials of the Company’s product candidates may produce negative or inconclusive results, and the Company may decide, or regulators may require the Company, to conduct additional nonclinical studies, clinical trials or abandon product development programs; ● the number of patients required for clinical trials of the Company’s product candidates may be larger than the Company anticipates, enrollment in these clinical trials may be slower than it anticipates or participants may drop out of these clinical trials at a higher rate than it anticipates; ● the Company’s third-party contractors may fail to comply with regulatory requirements or meet their contractual obligations to the Company in a timely manner, or at all; ● regulators, the IRB or a Data Safety Monitoring Board if one is used for the Company’s clinical trials, may require that the Company suspend or terminate its clinical trials for various reasons, including noncompliance with regulatory requirements, unforeseen safety issues or adverse side effects, failure to demonstrate a benefit from using a drug, or a finding that the participants are being exposed to unacceptable health risks; 51 ● the supply or quality of the Company’s product candidates or other materials necessary to conduct clinical trials of the Company’s product candidates may be insufficient or inadequate; ● transfer of manufacturing processes to larger-scale facilities operated by a CMO, and delays or failure by the Company’s CMOs or the Company to make any necessary changes to such manufacturing process; ● the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may require the Company to submit additional data or impose other requirements before permitting it to initiate a clinical trial; or ● changes in governmental regulations or administrative actions.
Clinical trials may be delayed, suspended or prematurely terminated because costs are greater than the Company anticipates or for a variety of other reasons, such as: ● delay or failure in reaching agreement with the FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority on a trial design that the Company is able to execute; ● delay or failure in obtaining authorization to commence a trial, including approval from the appropriate IRB or ethics committee at each clinical site to conduct testing of a candidate on human subjects, or inability to comply with conditions imposed by a regulatory authority regarding the scope or design of a clinical trial; ● delays in reaching, or failure to reach, agreement on acceptable terms with prospective trial sites and prospective CROs, the terms of which can be subject to extensive negotiation and may vary significantly among different CROs and trial sites; ● inability, delay or failure in identifying and maintaining a sufficient number of trial sites, many of which may already be engaged in other clinical programs; ● inability, delay or failure in identifying, recruiting, and training suitable clinical investigators; ● delay or failure in recruiting, screening, and enrolling suitable subjects to participate in a trial; ● delay or failure in having subjects complete a trial or return for post-treatment follow-up; ● delays caused by operational issues at clinical trial sites, including insufficient staffing; ● changes to the clinical trial protocols and/or changes in regulatory requirements and guidance that require amending or submitting new clinical protocols; ● clinical sites and investigators deviating from the clinical protocol, failing to conduct the trial in accordance with GCP or other regulatory requirements, or dropping out of a trial; ● failure to initiate or delay of or inability to complete a clinical trial as a result of the authorizing IND or foreign clinical trial application being placed on temporary or permanent clinical hold by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authority; ● lack of adequate funding to continue a clinical trial, including as a result of unforeseen costs due to enrollment delays, requirements to conduct additional clinical trials and increased expenses associated with the services of the Company’s CROs and other third parties, or the cost of clinical trials being greater than the Company anticipated; ● delays in manufacturing, testing, releasing, validating or importing/exporting sufficient stable quantities of drug product for use in clinical trials or the inability to do any of the foregoing; ● developments on trials conducted by competitors for related technology that raise FDA or foreign regulatory authority concerns about risk to patients of a technology or in any indication more broadly; ● clinical trials of the Company’s product candidates may produce negative or inconclusive results, and the Company may decide, or regulators may require the Company, to conduct additional nonclinical studies, clinical trials or abandon product development programs; 46 ● the number of patients required for clinical trials of the Company’s product candidates may be larger than the Company anticipates, enrollment in these clinical trials may be slower than it anticipates or participants may drop out of these clinical trials at a higher rate than it anticipates; ● the Company’s third-party contractors may fail to comply with regulatory requirements or meet their contractual obligations to the Company in a timely manner, or at all; ● regulators, the IRB or a Data Safety Monitoring Board if one is used for the Company’s clinical trials, may require that the Company suspend or terminate its clinical trials for various reasons, including noncompliance with regulatory requirements, unforeseen safety issues or adverse side effects, failure to demonstrate a benefit from using a drug, or a finding that the participants are being exposed to unacceptable health risks; ● the supply or quality of the Company’s product candidates or other materials necessary to conduct clinical trials of the Company’s product candidates may be insufficient or inadequate; ● transfer of manufacturing processes to larger-scale facilities operated by a CMO, and delays or failure by the Company’s CMOs or the Company to make any necessary changes to such manufacturing process; ● the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may require the Company to submit additional data or impose other requirements before permitting it to initiate a clinical trial; or ● changes in governmental regulations or administrative actions.
The Company ’ s information technology systems, or those of its vendors, collaborators or other contractors or consultants, may fail or suffer security incidents, loss of data and other disruptions, which could result in a material disruption of its product development programs, compromise sensitive information related to its business or prevent it from accessing critical information, potentially exposing it to liability or otherwise adversely affecting its business.
The Company ’ s IT systems, or those of its vendors, collaborators or other contractors or consultants, may fail or suffer security incidents, loss of data and other disruptions, which could result in a material disruption of its product development programs, compromise sensitive information related to its business or prevent it from accessing critical information, potentially exposing it to liability or otherwise adversely affecting its business.
There is also a risk that due to regulatory changes, such as suspensions on the use of NOLs or other unforeseen reasons, the Company’s existing NOLs could expire or otherwise be unavailable to offset future income tax liabilities. 82 The Company incurs costs and demands upon management as a result of complying with the laws, rules and regulations affecting public companies.
There is also a risk that due to regulatory changes, such as suspensions on the use of NOLs or other unforeseen reasons, the Company’s existing NOLs could expire or otherwise be unavailable to offset future income tax liabilities. The Company incurs costs and demands upon management as a result of complying with the laws, rules and regulations affecting public companies.
Without an internal team or the support of a third party to perform marketing and sales functions, the Company may be unable to compete successfully against these more established companies. 73 Consumers may sue the Company for product liability, which could result in substantial liabilities that exceed its available resources and damage its reputation.
Without an internal team or the support of a third party to perform marketing and sales functions, the Company may be unable to compete successfully against these more established companies. Consumers may sue the Company for product liability, which could result in substantial liabilities that exceed its available resources and damage its reputation.
As a result, the Company’s financial results and the commercial prospects for neflamapimod would be harmed, its costs could increase, and its ability to generate revenue could be delayed, all of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. 58 The Company has employed several different CROs for clinical trial services.
As a result, the Company’s financial results and the commercial prospects for neflamapimod would be harmed, its costs could increase, and its ability to generate revenue could be delayed, all of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. The Company has employed several different CROs for clinical trial services.
If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a substantial adverse effect on the price of the Company’s common stock. 64 Changes in patent laws or patent jurisprudence could diminish the value of patents in general, thereby impairing the Company ’ s ability to protect its product candidates.
If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a substantial adverse effect on the price of the Company’s common stock. Changes in patent laws or patent jurisprudence could diminish the value of patents in general, thereby impairing the Company ’ s ability to protect its product candidates.
If the Company or its third party providers, including the Company’s CMOs, fail to comply fully with applicable regulations, then the Company may be required to initiate a recall or withdrawal of its products. The Company must also comply with requirements concerning advertising and promotion for any of its product candidates for which it obtains marketing approval.
If the Company or its third party providers, including the Company’s CMOs, fail to comply fully with applicable regulations, then the Company may be required to initiate a recall or withdrawal of its products. 66 The Company must also comply with requirements concerning advertising and promotion for any of its product candidates for which it obtains marketing approval.
The Company has concentrated its research and development efforts on the treatment of DLB, a disease that has seen limited success in drug development. The ability to successfully develop drugs for DLB and other age-related neurologic disorders is extremely difficult and is subject to a number of unique challenges.
The Company has concentrated its recent research and development efforts on the treatment of DLB, a disease that has seen limited success in drug development. The ability to successfully develop drugs for DLB and other age-related neurologic disorders is extremely difficult and is subject to a number of unique challenges.
The Company may not prevail in any lawsuits that it initiates, and the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially meaningful. 65 Some countries also have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner may be compelled to grant licenses to third parties.
The Company may not prevail in any lawsuits that it initiates, and the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially meaningful. Some countries also have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner may be compelled to grant licenses to third parties.
The existence of differing comprehensive privacy laws in different states in the country will make the Company’s compliance obligations more complex and costly and may require us to modify the Company’s data processing practices and policies and to incur substantial costs and potential liability in an effort to comply with such legislation.
The existence of differing comprehensive privacy laws in different states in the country may make the Company’s compliance obligations more complex and costly and may require us to modify the Company’s data processing practices and policies and to incur substantial costs and potential liability in an effort to comply with such legislation.
Thus, the cost of compliance with post-approval regulations may have a negative effect on the Company’s operating results and financial condition. 74 The FDA’s policies may change and additional government regulations may be enacted that could prevent, limit or delay marketing approval of the Company’s product candidates.
Thus, the cost of compliance with post-approval regulations may have a negative effect on the Company’s operating results and financial condition. The FDA’s policies may change and additional government regulations may be enacted that could prevent, limit or delay marketing approval of the Company’s product candidates.
Even if the Company were to obtain sufficient funding, there can be no assurance that it will be available on terms acceptable to the Company or its stockholders. The Company currently does not have, and may never have, any products that generate significant revenues.
Even if the Company were to obtain sufficient funding, there can be no assurance that it will be available on terms acceptable to the Company or its stockholders. 42 The Company currently does not have, and may never have, any products that generate significant revenues.
Growth in the costs and expenses of raw materials may also impair the Company’s ability to cost effectively manufacture its product candidates. 59 The Company also currently relies on a third-party CMO (different than that for the API) for the manufacture of neflamapimod drug product.
Growth in the costs and expenses of raw materials may also impair the Company’s ability to cost effectively manufacture its product candidates. The Company also currently relies on a third-party CMO (different than that for the API) for the manufacture of neflamapimod drug product.
Accordingly, investors should not rely upon the results of any particular quarterly or annual period as indications of the Company’s future operating performance. 68 The Company ’ s business operations are subject to applicable healthcare laws and regulations.
Accordingly, investors should not rely upon the results of any particular quarterly or annual period as indications of the Company’s future operating performance. The Company ’ s business operations are subject to applicable healthcare laws and regulations.
This requires the Company to be cognizant going forward of the time from invention to filing of a patent application. The AIA also introduced changes that provide opportunities for third parties to challenge any issued patent with the USPTO.
This requires the Company to be cognizant going forward of the time from invention to filing of a patent application. 58 The AIA also introduced changes that provide opportunities for third parties to challenge any issued patent with the USPTO.
In California, the CCPA, which became effective in 2020, broadly defines personal information, gives California residents expanded individual privacy rights and protections and provides for civil penalties for violations and a private right of action for data breaches.
For example, the CCPA, which became effective in 2020, broadly defines personal information, gives California residents expanded individual privacy rights and protections and provides for civil penalties for violations and a private right of action for data breaches.
In addition, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments, which could damage the Company’s reputation, harm its business, and the price of its common stock could be adversely affected. 63 The Company may not identify relevant third-party patents or may incorrectly interpret the relevance, scope or expiration of a third-party patent, which might adversely affect the Company ’ s ability to develop, manufacture and market its product candidates.
In addition, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments, which could damage the Company’s reputation, harm its business, and the price of its common stock could be adversely affected. 57 The Company may not identify relevant third-party patents or may incorrectly interpret the relevance, scope or expiration of a third-party patent, which might adversely affect the Company ’ s ability to develop, manufacture and market its product candidates.
If the Company does not have sufficient patent life to protect the Company’s products, the Company’s business and results of operations will be adversely affected. 66 Intellectual property discovered or developed through government funded programs may be subject to federal regulations such as “ march-in ” rights, certain reporting requirements and a manufacturing preference for U.S.-based companies.
If the Company does not have sufficient patent life to protect the Company’s products, the Company’s business and results of operations will be adversely affected. 59 Intellectual property discovered or developed through government funded programs may be subject to federal regulations such as “ march-in ” rights, certain reporting requirements and a manufacturing preference for U.S.-based companies.
Alternatively, if the Company elects to fund drug development or research programs on its own, it will have to increase its expenditures and will need to obtain additional funding, which may not be available to the Company on acceptable terms, if at all. 57 If the Company is unable to take full advantage of regulatory programs designed to expedite drug development or provide other incentives, its development programs may be adversely impacted.
Alternatively, if the Company elects to fund drug development or research programs on its own, it will have to increase its expenditures and will need to obtain additional funding, which may not be available to the Company on acceptable terms, if at all. 52 If the Company is unable to take full advantage of regulatory programs designed to expedite drug development or provide other incentives, its development programs may be adversely impacted.
Because the Company expects sales of its product candidates, if approved, to generate substantially all of its revenues for the foreseeable future, the failure of the Company’s product candidates to find market acceptance would materially harm its business. 70 If the market opportunity for any product candidate that the Company develops is smaller than it believes, its revenue may be adversely affected and its business may suffer.
Because the Company expects sales of its product candidates, if approved, to generate substantially all of its revenues for the foreseeable future, the failure of the Company’s product candidates to find market acceptance would materially harm its business. 63 If the market opportunity for any product candidate that the Company develops is smaller than it believes, its revenue may be adversely affected and its business may suffer.
In addition, EIP has filed patents related to formulations of neflamapimod, including pharmaceutical compositions for oral administration exhibiting desirable pharmacokinetics and processes for the manufacture thereof. In the U.S., the natural expiration of a patent is generally 20 years after it is filed. Although various extensions may be available, the life of a patent is limited.
In addition, EIP has filed patents related to formulations of neflamapimod, including pharmaceutical compositions for oral administration exhibiting desirable PK and processes for the manufacture thereof. In the U.S., the natural expiration of a patent is generally 20 years after it is filed. Although various extensions may be available, the life of a patent is limited.
Further, the CPRA, which became effective in 2023 and amends the CCPA, creates additional obligations with respect to processing and storing personal information. While there is limited exception for protected health information that is subject to HIPAA and clinical trial regulations, the CCPA may regulate or impact our processing of personal information depending on the context.
Further, the CPRA, which became effective in 2023 and amends the CCPA, creates additional obligations with respect to processing and storing personal information. While there is limited exception for protected health information that is subject to HIPAA and clinical trial regulations, the CCPA may regulate or impact the Company’s processing of personal information depending on the context.
Even if the Company’s clinical trials for neflamapimod are completed as planned, including a future Phase 3 trial, the Company cannot be certain that their results will support the safety and efficacy sufficient to obtain regulatory approval, and the Company may decide, or regulators may require it, to conduct additional clinical trials.
Even if the Company’s clinical trials for neflamapimod are completed as planned, including any future Phase 3 trial, the Company cannot be certain that their results will support the safety and efficacy sufficient to obtain regulatory approval, and the Company may decide, or regulators may require it, to conduct additional clinical trials.
Some of the factors that may cause the market price of the Company’s common stock to fluctuate include among others: ● the ability of the Company or its partners to develop product candidates and conduct clinical trials that demonstrate such product candidates are safe and effective; ● the ability of the Company or its partners to obtain regulatory approvals for product candidates, and delays or failures to obtain such approvals; ● failure of any of the Company’s product candidates to demonstrate safety and efficacy, receive regulatory approval and achieve commercial success; ● failure by the Company to maintain its existing third-party license, manufacturing and supply agreements; ● failure by the Company or its licensors to prosecute, maintain, or enforce its intellectual property rights; ● changes in laws or regulations applicable to the Company’s product candidates; ● any inability to obtain adequate supply of product candidates or the inability to do so at acceptable prices; ● adverse regulatory authority decisions; ● introduction of new or competing products by the Company’s competitors; ● failure to meet or exceed financial and development projections the Company may provide to the public; ● the perception of the pharmaceutical industry by the public, legislatures, regulators and the investment community; ● announcements of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures, or capital commitments by the Company or its competitors; ● disputes or other developments relating to proprietary rights, including patents, litigation matters, and the Company’s ability to obtain intellectual property protection for its technologies; ● additions or departures of key personnel; ● significant lawsuits, including intellectual property or stockholder litigation; ● if securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about the Company, or if they issue an adverse or misleading opinions regarding its business and stock; ● changes in the market valuations of similar companies; ● general market or macroeconomic conditions; ● sales of its common stock by the Company or its stockholders in the future; ● the trading volume of the Company’s common stock; ● the limited percentage of the Company’s outstanding shares that are currently freely tradeable as a result of the significant holdings of the Company’s directors and officers; ● adverse publicity relating to the Company’s markets generally, including with respect to other products and potential products in such markets; ● changes in the structure of health care payment systems; and ● period-to-period fluctuations in the Company’s financial results. 75 Accordingly, the market price of Company’s common stock may be highly volatile and could fluctuate widely in price as a result of these or other factors.
Some of the factors that may cause the market price of the Company’s common stock to fluctuate include among others: ● the ability of the Company or its partners to develop product candidates and conduct clinical trials that demonstrate such product candidates are safe and effective; ● the ability of the Company or its partners to obtain regulatory approvals for product candidates, and delays or failures to obtain such approvals; ● failure of any of the Company’s product candidates to demonstrate safety and efficacy, receive regulatory approval and achieve commercial success; ● failure by the Company to maintain its existing third-party license, manufacturing and supply agreements; ● failure by the Company or its licensors to prosecute, maintain, or enforce its intellectual property rights; ● changes in laws or regulations applicable to the Company’s product candidates; ● any inability to obtain adequate supply of product candidates or the inability to do so at acceptable prices; ● adverse regulatory authority decisions; ● introduction of new or competing products by the Company’s competitors; ● failure to meet or exceed financial and development projections the Company may provide to the public; ● the perception of the pharmaceutical industry by the public, legislatures, regulators and the investment community; ● announcements of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures, or capital commitments by the Company or its competitors; 67 ● disputes or other developments relating to proprietary rights, including patents, litigation matters, and the Company’s ability to obtain intellectual property protection for its technologies; ● additions or departures of key personnel; ● significant lawsuits, including intellectual property or stockholder litigation; ● if securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about the Company, or if they issue an adverse or misleading opinions regarding its business and stock; ● changes in the market valuations of similar companies; ● general market or macroeconomic conditions; ● sales of its common stock by the Company or its stockholders in the future; ● the trading volume of the Company’s common stock; ● the limited percentage of the Company’s outstanding shares that are currently freely tradeable as a result of the significant holdings of the Company’s directors and officers; ● adverse publicity relating to the Company’s markets generally, including with respect to other products and potential products in such markets; ● changes in the structure of health care payment systems; and ● period-to-period fluctuations in the Company’s financial results.
If such funds are no longer available, including due to a government shutdown that prohibits the disbursal of such funds, or the Company fails to demonstrate such progress, the Company’s ability to continue its clinical programs may be impaired and delayed, and the Company may otherwise need to seek additional financing.
If such funds are no longer available, including due to a government shutdown or executive order that prohibits the disbursal of such funds, or the Company fails to demonstrate such progress, the Company’s ability to continue its clinical programs may be impaired and delayed, and the Company may otherwise need to seek additional financing.
In cases where data from non-U.S. clinical trials are intended to serve as the basis for marketing approval in the U.S., the FDA will generally not accept such foreign trial data unless: (i) the data are determined to be applicable to the U.S. population and U.S. medical practice; (ii) the trials were performed by clinical investigators of recognized competence and pursuant to GCP regulations; and (iii) the FDA is able to validate the data through an onsite inspection, if necessary.
In cases where data from non-U.S. clinical trials are intended to serve as the basis for marketing approval in the U.S. and the trial is not conducted under the IND, the FDA will generally not accept such foreign trial data unless: (i) the data are determined to be applicable to the U.S. population and U.S. medical practice; (ii) the trials were performed by clinical investigators of recognized competence and pursuant to GCP regulations; and (iii) the FDA is able to validate the data through an onsite inspection, if necessary.
Fast track designation is granted by FDA, in response to a sponsor’s request, upon a determination that the product candidate is intended to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition and has the potential to address an unmet medical need, meaning it could provide a therapeutic option for patients where none exists or a therapy that may be potentially superior to existing therapy based on efficacy or safety factors.
Fast t rack designation is granted by FDA, in response to a sponsor’s request, upon a determination that the product candidate is intended to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition and has the potential to address an unmet medical need, meaning it could provide a therapeutic option for patients where none exists or a therapy that may be potentially superior to existing therapy based on efficacy or safety factors.
In August 2022, President Biden signed into law the IRA, which, among other things, requires manufacturers of certain drugs to engage in price negotiations with Medicare (beginning in 2026), with prices that can be negotiated subject to a cap; imposes rebates under Medicare Part B and Medicare Part D to penalize price increases that outpace inflation (first due in 2023); and replaces the Part D coverage gap discount program with a new discounting program (beginning in 2025).
In August 2022, the IRA was signed into law, which, among other things, requires manufacturers of certain drugs to engage in price negotiations with Medicare (beginning in 2026), with prices that can be negotiated subject to a cap; imposes rebates under Medicare Part B and Medicare Part D to penalize price increases that outpace inflation (first due in 2023); and replaces the Part D coverage gap discount program with a new discounting program (beginning in 2025).
A competitor’s discovery of the Company’s trade secrets could impair its competitive position and have an adverse impact on its business. 67 Intellectual property rights do not necessarily address all potential threats to the Company ’ s competitive advantage.
A competitor’s discovery of the Company’s trade secrets could impair its competitive position and have an adverse impact on its business. 60 Intellectual property rights do not necessarily address all potential threats to the Company ’ s competitive advantage.
Unlike other state privacy laws, the CCPA also regulates personal information collected in a business to business and in human resources contexts. Further, there continues to be some uncertainly about how provisions of the CCPA and the new regulations will be interpreted and how the law will be enforced.
Unlike other state privacy laws, the CCPA also regulates personal information collected in a business to business and in human resources contexts. Further, there continues to be some uncertainty about how provisions of the CCPA and the new regulations will be interpreted and how the law will be enforced.
Based upon the Company’s current operating plan, the Company believes that the Company’s cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2023, will not be sufficient to enable the Company to fund its operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements for a period of at least 12 months following the issuance of the financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report without an additional equity or debt financing.
Based upon the Company’s current operating plan, the Company believes that the Company’s cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2024, will be sufficient to enable the Company to fund its operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements for a period of at least 12 months following the issuance of the financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report without an additional equity or debt financing.
This reliance on contract manufacturers and suppliers subjects the Company to inherent uncertainties related to product safety, availability, security and cost. Holders of NDAs, or other forms of FDA approvals, or those distributing a regulated product under their own name, are ultimately responsible for compliance with manufacturing obligations even if the manufacturing is conducted by a third party.
This reliance on CMOs and suppliers subjects the Company to inherent uncertainties related to product safety, availability, security and cost. Holders of NDAs, or other forms of FDA approvals, or those distributing a regulated product under their own name, are ultimately responsible for compliance with manufacturing obligations even if the manufacturing is conducted by a third party.
The Company ’ s business activities may be subject to the FCPA and similar anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws. The Company’s business activities may be subject to the FCPA and similar anti-bribery or anti-corruption laws, regulations or rules of other countries in which the Company operates, including the U.K. Bribery Act.
The Company’s business activities may be subject to the FCPA and similar anti-bribery or anti-corruption laws, regulations or rules of other countries in which the Company operates, including the U.K. Bribery Act.
In an early 2000s study of neflamapimod conducted by Vertex, during 12 weeks of dosing at 250mg BID (i.e., four-fold higher daily dosing than the dose in the RewinD-LB Trial) in 44 subjects with rheumatoid arthritis, elevations in such liver enzymes levels were noted in six subjects (14%).
In an early 2000s study of neflamapimod conducted by Vertex, during 12 weeks of dosing at 250mg BID (i.e., four-fold higher daily dosing than the dose in the RewinD-LB Trial) in 44 subjects with RA, elevations in such liver enzymes levels were noted in six subjects (14%).
The Federal Trade Commission in mid-2022 also launched sweeping investigations into the practices of the PBM industry, and members of Congress continue to propose reforms for the PBM industry, all or each of which could lead to additional federal and state legislative or regulatory proposals targeting such entities’ operations, pharmacy networks, or financial arrangements.
The FTC in mid-2022 also launched sweeping investigations into the practices of the PBM industry, and members of Congress continue to propose reforms for the PBM industry, all or each of which could lead to additional federal and state legislative or regulatory proposals targeting such entities’ operations, pharmacy networks, or financial arrangements.
Failure to do so can result in fines, adverse publicity and civil and criminal sanctions. 50 Clinical drug development involves a lengthy and expensive process, with an uncertain outcome.
Failure to do so can result in fines, adverse publicity and civil and criminal sanctions. 45 Clinical drug development involves a lengthy and expensive process, with an uncertain outcome.
There have been limited efforts by biopharmaceutical and pharmaceutical companies to develop treatments for DLB and there are no therapies available for patients that have been approved with a specific indication to treat DLB. Only symptomatic therapies that are approved for other diseases, generally either AD or Parkinson’s disease, are currently utilized to manage patients with DLB.
There have been limited efforts by biopharmaceutical and pharmaceutical companies to develop treatments for DLB and there are no therapies available for patients that have been approved with a specific indication to treat DLB. Only symptomatic therapies that are approved for other diseases, generally either AD or PD, are currently utilized to manage patients with DLB.
We expect that future changes or additions to the ACA, the Medicare and Medicaid programs, and changes stemming from other healthcare reform measures, especially with regard to healthcare access, financing or other legislation in individual states, could have a material adverse effect on the healthcare industry in the United States.
We expect that future changes or additions to the ACA, the Medicare and Medicaid programs, and changes stemming from other healthcare reform measures, especially with regard to healthcare access, financing or other legislation in individual states, could have a material adverse effect on the healthcare industry in the U.S.
The Company may also encounter difficulties in managing its growth, which could disrupt its operations. ● The Company has identified material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting which, if not corrected, could affect the reliability of the Company’s financial statements and have other adverse consequences.
The Company may also encounter difficulties in managing its growth, which could disrupt its operations. ● The Company has identified a material weakness in its internal control over financial reporting which, if not corrected, could affect the reliability of the Company’s financial statements and have other adverse consequences.
The GDPR imposes stringent data protection requirements and provides for penalties for noncompliance of up to the greater of €20 million or four percent of worldwide annual revenues.
The GDPR imposes stringent data protection requirements and provides for penalties for noncompliance of up to the greater of €20 million or four percent of worldwide annual turnover.
In addition, the U.S. Congress recently amended the FDCA to require sponsors of a Phase 3 clinical trial, or other “pivotal study” of a new drug or biologic to support marketing authorization, to design and submit a diversity action plan for such clinical trial.
In addition, the U.S. Congress recently amended the FDCA to require sponsors of a Phase 3 clinical trial or other “pivotal study” of a new drug or biologic to support MA, to design and submit a diversity action plan for such clinical trial.
Additionally, in many other countries, the health care providers who prescribe pharmaceuticals are employed by their government, and the purchasers of pharmaceuticals are government entities; therefore, any Company dealings with these prescribers and purchasers are subject to regulation under the FCPA. The SEC and U.S.
Additionally, in many other countries, the health care providers who prescribe pharmaceuticals are employed by their government, and the purchasers of pharmaceuticals are government entities; therefore, any Company dealings with these prescribers and purchasers are subject to regulation under the FCPA.
For example, the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union adopted a comprehensive general data privacy framework called the GDPR which became fully effective in May 2018 and governs the collection and use of personal data in the European Union, including by companies outside of the European Union., The GDPR also imposes strict rules on the transfer of personal data out of the European Union to the United States.
For example, the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union adopted a comprehensive general data privacy framework called the GDPR which became fully effective in May 2018 and governs the collection and use of personal data in the European Union, including by companies outside of the European Union., The GDPR also imposes strict rules on the transfer of personal data out of the European Union to the U.S.
Serious adverse events or undesirable side effects caused by neflamapimod, or any other product candidates the Company may develop or acquire, could cause it or regulatory authorities to interrupt, delay or halt clinical trials and could result in a more restrictive label or the delay or denial of regulatory approval by the FDA or other comparable foreign authorities.
SAEs or undesirable side effects caused by neflamapimod, or any other product candidates the Company may develop or acquire, could cause it or regulatory authorities to interrupt, delay or halt clinical trials and could result in a more restrictive label or the delay or denial of regulatory approval by the FDA or other comparable foreign authorities.
Approval and licensure procedures vary among jurisdictions and can involve requirements and administrative review periods different from, and greater than, those in the United States, including additional nonclinical studies or clinical trials as clinical trials conducted in one jurisdiction may not be accepted by regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions.
Approval and licensure procedures vary among jurisdictions and can involve requirements and administrative review periods different from, and greater than, those in the U.S., including additional nonclinical studies or clinical trials as clinical trials conducted in one jurisdiction may not be accepted by regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions.
For example, in March 2020, the CARES Act was signed into law, which included certain changes in tax law intended to stimulate the U.S. economy in response to the COVID-19 coronavirus outbreak, including temporary beneficial changes to the treatment of net operating losses, interest deductibility limitations and payroll tax matters.
For example, in March 2020, the CARES Act was signed into law, which included certain changes in tax law intended to stimulate the U.S. economy in response to the COVID-19 coronavirus outbreak, including temporary beneficial changes to the treatment of NOLs, interest deductibility limitations and payroll tax matters.
Disruptions at the FDA and other agencies may also slow the time necessary for clinical trial applications and/or marketing applications for new drugs to be reviewed or approved, which would adversely affect the Company’s business.
In addition, disruptions at the FDA and other agencies may slow the time necessary for clinical trial applications and/or marketing applications for new drugs to be reviewed or approved, which would adversely affect the Company’s business.
If neflamapimod, or any other product candidates the Company may develop or acquire, receives marketing approval and the Company or others identify undesirable side effects caused by such product candidates (or any other similar products) after such approval, a number of potentially significant negative consequences could result, including: ● regulatory authorities may withdraw or limit their approval of such product candidates; ● regulatory authorities may require the addition of labeling statements, such as a “Boxed” Warning or a contraindication; ● the Company may be required to change the way such product candidates are distributed or administered, conduct additional clinical trials or change the labeling of the product candidates; ● the FDA may require a REMS plan to mitigate risks, which could include medication guides, physician communication plans, or elements to assure safe use, such as restricted distribution methods, patient registries and other risk minimization tools, and regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions may require comparable risk mitigation plans; ● the Company may be subject to regulatory investigations and government enforcement actions; ● the FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority may require the Company to conduct additional clinical trials or costly post-marketing testing and surveillance to monitor the safety and efficacy of the product; ● the Company may decide to recall such product candidates from the marketplace after they are approved; ● the Company could be sued and held liable for injury caused to individuals exposed to or taking its product candidates; and ● the Company’s reputation may suffer. 56 The Company may be unable to obtain regulatory approval in the U.S. or foreign jurisdictions and, as a result, be unable to commercialize its product candidates and its ability to generate revenue will be materially impaired.
If neflamapimod, or any other product candidates the Company may develop or acquire, receives marketing approval and the Company or others identify undesirable side effects caused by such product candidates (or any other similar products) after such approval, a number of potentially significant negative consequences could result, including: ● regulatory authorities may withdraw or limit their approval of such product candidates; ● regulatory authorities may require the addition of labeling statements, such as a “Boxed” Warning or a contraindication; ● the Company may be required to change the way such product candidates are distributed or administered, conduct additional clinical trials or change the labeling of the product candidates; ● the FDA may require a REMS plan to mitigate risks, which could include medication guides, physician communication plans, or elements to assure safe use, such as restricted distribution methods, patient registries and other risk minimization tools, and regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions may require comparable risk mitigation plans; 51 ● the Company may be subject to regulatory investigations and government enforcement actions; ● the FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority may require the Company to conduct additional clinical trials or costly post-marketing testing and surveillance to monitor the safety and efficacy of the product; ● the Company may decide to recall such product candidates from the marketplace after they are approved; ● the Company could be sued and held liable for injury caused to individuals exposed to or taking its product candidates; and ● the Company’s reputation may suffer.
Delays or failures in planned enrollment or retention of clinical trial subjects, including in the Company’s ongoing RewinD-LB Trial, may result in increased costs or program delays, which could have a harmful effect on the Company’s ability to develop a product candidate or could render further development impossible. 53 Results of preclinical studies and early clinical trials may not be indicative of results obtained in later trials.
Delays or failures in planned enrollment or retention of clinical trial subjects may result in increased costs or program delays, which could have a harmful effect on the Company’s ability to develop a product candidate or could render further development impossible. Results of preclinical studies and early clinical trials may not be indicative of results obtained in later trials.
In many jurisdictions outside the United States, a product candidate must be approved for reimbursement before it can be approved for sale in that jurisdiction. In some cases, the price that we intend to charge for our products is also subject to approval.
In many jurisdictions outside the U.S., a product candidate must be approved for reimbursement before it can be approved for sale in that jurisdiction. In some cases, the price that we intend to charge for our products is also subject to approval.
The Company cannot be certain that the RewinD-LB Trial or any future clinical development of neflamapimod will be successful, or that it will receive the regulatory approvals required to commercialize neflamapimod for any intended use, or that any future research and drug discovery programs undertaken by the Company will yield a drug candidate suitable for investigation through clinical trials.
The Company cannot be certain that its ongoing trials or any future clinical development of neflamapimod will be successful, or that it will receive the regulatory approvals required to commercialize neflamapimod for any intended use, or that any future research and drug discovery programs undertaken by the Company will yield a drug candidate suitable for investigation through clinical trials.
Past or future transactions resulting in an ownership change under Section 382 of the Code may subject the Company ’ s NOL carryforwards and certain other tax attributes to limitation. As of December 31, 2023, the Company had U.S. federal NOL carryforwards of approximately $38.9 million.
Past or future transactions resulting in an ownership change under Section 382 may subject the Company ’ s NOL carryforwards and certain other tax attributes to limitation. As of December 31, 2024, the Company had U.S. federal NOL carryforwards of approximately $38.7 million.
Any analysis we perform of data from chemistry, manufacturing and controls, preclinical and clinical activities is subject to confirmation and interpretation by regulatory authorities, which could delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval.
Any analysis we perform of data from CMC, preclinical and clinical activities is subject to confirmation and interpretation by regulatory authorities, which could delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval.
For example, in connection with the audit of the Company’s financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, material weaknesses in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting were identified related to (i) the Company’s recording of significant complex transactions, and (ii) the absence of effective controls regarding the accurate identification, evaluation and proper recording of various expense accounts.
For example, in connection with the audit of the Company’s financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, material weaknesses in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting were identified related to the absence of effective controls regarding the accurate identification, evaluation and proper recording of various expense accounts, and in the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, an additional material weakness related to the Company’s recording of significant complex transactions was identified.
There are a number of programs administered by the FDA and other regulatory bodies to facilitate and expedite development of drugs in areas of unmet medical need. For example, neflamapimod received a fast track designation in October 2019 from the FDA for investigation as a treatment of DLB.
There are a number of programs administered by the FDA and other regulatory bodies to facilitate and expedite development of drugs in areas of unmet medical need. For example, neflamapimod received a f ast t rack designation in October 2019 from the FDA for investigation as a treatment of DLB.
Fast track designation does not ensure that neflamapimod will receive marketing approval or that approval will be granted within any particular timeframe.
Fast t rack designation does not ensure that neflamapimod will receive marketing approval or that approval will be granted within any particular timeframe.
While the Company believes it has meritorious defense to the claims alleged in this matter and is defending itself vigorously, the Company is unable to predict the outcome and possible loss or range of loss, if any, associated with its resolution or any potential effect the matter may have on the Company’s financial position.
While the Company is defending itself vigorously against the claims alleged in this matter, the Company is unable to predict the outcome and possible loss or range of loss, if any, associated with its resolution or any potential effect the matter may have on the Company’s financial position.
Although fast track designation and other available FDA programs may expedite the development or approval process for certain drug candidates, such programs do not change the standards for approval, and the Company may not experience a faster development or regulatory review or approval process with fast track designation compared to conventional FDA procedures.
Although f ast t rack designation and other available FDA programs may expedite the development or approval process for certain drug candidates, such programs do not change the standards for approval, and the Company may not experience a faster development or regulatory review or approval process with f ast t rack designation compared to conventional FDA procedures.
In connection with designing and conducting its clinical trials, the Company faces significant risks, including that its product candidate may not prove to be efficacious, patients may suffer adverse effects for reasons that may or may not be related to the product candidate being tested, the results may not confirm the positive results of its earlier preclinical studies and clinical trials, and the results may not meet the level of statistical significance required by the FDA or other regulatory agencies to support approval.
In connection with designing and conducting its clinical trials, the Company faces significant risks, including that its product candidate may not prove to be efficacious, patients may suffer adverse effects for reasons that may or may not be related to the product candidate being tested, the results may not confirm the positive results of its earlier preclinical studies and clinical trials, the FDA may disagree with the Company’s interpretation of the clinical trial data or how those data inform the design of future clinical trials, and the results may not meet the level of statistical significance required by the FDA or other regulatory agencies to support approval.
They may also conduct similar research, seek patent protection, and establish collaborative arrangements for research, development, manufacturing and marketing of products that may compete with neflamapimod. Currently, there are a limited number of companies and disease modifying approaches for DLB.
They may also conduct similar research, seek patent protection, and establish collaborative arrangements for research, development, manufacturing and marketing of products that may compete with neflamapimod. Currently, there are a limited number of companies developing treatments specifically for DLB.
The timing of the Company’s receipt of the remaining 10% of the grant, or $0.8 million, of current year funding is dependent upon and subject to U.S. congressional approval of a final appropriations bill.
The timing of the Company’s receipt of the remaining 10% of current year funding is dependent upon and subject to U.S. congressional approval of a final appropriations bill.
The Company’s market opportunity may also be limited by future competitor treatments that enter the market. If any of the Company’s estimates prove to be inaccurate, the market opportunity for any product candidate that the Company or its strategic partners develop could be significantly diminished and have an adverse material impact on its business.
If any of the Company’s estimates prove to be inaccurate, the market opportunity for any product candidate that the Company or its strategic partners develop could be significantly diminished and have an adverse material impact on its business.
The duration and outcome of these conflicts, any retaliatory actions or escalation, and the impact on regional or global economies is unknown but could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of its operations. Unfavorable global economic conditions could adversely affect the Company ’ s business, financial condition or results of operations.
The duration and outcome of these conflicts, any retaliatory actions or escalation, and the impact on regional or global economies is unknown but could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of its operations.
In addition, the FDA may withdraw fast track designation for neflamapimod if it believes that the designation is no longer supported by data from the Company’s clinical development program.
In addition, the FDA may withdraw f ast t rack designation for neflamapimod if it believes that the designation is no longer supported by data from the Company’s clinical development program.
A failure of any of the Company’s current or future CMOs to establish and follow cGMPs and to document their adherence to such practices may lead to significant delays in obtaining regulatory approval of product candidates or the ultimate launch of products based on the Company’s product candidates into the market.
A failure of any of the Company’s current or future CMOs to establish and follow adequate procedures to ensure compliance with applicable cGMP requirements and to document their adherence to such practices may lead to significant delays in obtaining regulatory approval of product candidates or the ultimate launch of products based on the Company’s product candidates into the market.
Failure to qualify for regulatory exclusivity, or failure to obtain or to maintain the extent or duration of such protections that the Company expects for its product candidates, if approved, could affect the Company’s decision on whether to market the products in a particular country or countries or could otherwise have an adverse impact on its revenue or results of operations. 61 There is currently no composition of matter patent protection that covers neflamapimod.
Failure to qualify for regulatory exclusivity, or failure to obtain or to maintain the extent or duration of such protections that the Company expects for its product candidates, if approved, could affect the Company’s decision on whether to market the products in a particular country or countries or could otherwise have an adverse impact on its revenue or results of operations.
Among other obligations, the Vertex Agreement provides that the Company will make royalty payments to Vertex in the event aggregate net sales for a commercialized licensed product meet specified thresholds, subject to adjustment in the event of certain events, such as the absence of a valid patent claim or if fees are due to a third party for a license necessary for the development, manufacture, sale or use of a licensed product.
The Vertex Agreement sets forth specific regulatory and product approval events and the related payments that the Company would be obligated to make to Vertex, if and when such events occur. 43 Among other obligations, the Vertex Agreement provides that the Company will make royalty payments to Vertex in the event aggregate net sales for a commercialized licensed product meet specified thresholds, subject to adjustment in the event of certain events, such as the absence of a valid patent claim or if fees are due to a third party for a license necessary for the development, manufacture, sale or use of a licensed product.
Many comparable non-U.S. regulatory authorities have similar approval requirements. 54 There can be no assurance that the FDA will accept data from trials conducted outside of the U.S. or that any comparable non-U.S. regulatory authority will accept data form trials conducted outside of the applicable jurisdiction.
There can be no assurance that the FDA will accept data from trials conducted outside of the U.S. or that any comparable non-U.S. regulatory authority will accept data form trials conducted outside of the applicable jurisdiction.
The Company’s operations could be significantly adversely affected by the effects of a widespread outbreak of epidemics, pandemics or other health crises, including COVID-19.
Epidemics, pandemics or other public health crises, including COVID-19, could adversely affect the Company ’ s business. The Company’s operations could be significantly adversely affected by the effects of a widespread outbreak of epidemics, pandemics or other health crises, including COVID-19.
In addition, in the event that the FDA or other regulatory agencies do not accept nonclinical comparability data, the Company may need to conduct a study involving dosing of patients comparing the two products.
In addition, in the event that the FDA or other regulatory agencies do not accept nonclinical comparability data, the Company may need to conduct a study involving dosing of patients comparing the two products. That study may result in a delay in the approval or launch of any of its product candidates.
The Company has incurred net losses since its inception, and as of December 31, 2023, it had an accumulated deficit of approximately $54.4 million. The Company expects to incur net losses for the foreseeable future as it incurs significant clinical development costs related to the advancement of neflamapimod.
The Company has incurred net losses in each fiscal year since its inception, and as of December 31, 2024, it had an accumulated deficit of approximately $70.7 million. The Company expects to incur net losses for the foreseeable future as it incurs significant clinical development costs related to the advancement of neflamapimod.
As a consequence of this lack of liquidity, the trading of relatively small quantities of shares by shareholders may disproportionately influence the price of those shares in either direction, particularly over short periods of time.
In addition, the shares of common stock may be sporadically or thinly traded. As a consequence of this lack of liquidity, the trading of relatively small quantities of shares by shareholders may disproportionately influence the price of those shares in either direction, particularly over short periods of time.
For example, the Company was granted access to $7.3 million under the NIA Grant in February 2024, 90% of the full amount of the second year of funding provided for in the NIA Grant, due to current NIA policy as a result of the U.S. government currently being funded on the basis of a continuing resolution.
For example, in March 2025, the Company was granted access to 90% of the full amount of the third year of funding provided for in the NIA Grant, due to current NIA policy as a result of the U.S. government currently being funded on the basis of a continuing resolution.
As a result, it may be more difficult for the Company to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve on the Company’s Board or as executive officers of the Company, which may adversely affect investor confidence in the Company and could cause the Company’s business or stock price to suffer.
As a result, it may be more difficult for the Company to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve on the Company’s Board or as executive officers of the Company, which may adversely affect investor confidence in the Company and could cause the Company’s business or stock price to suffer. 75 The Company ’ s business activities may be subject to the FCPA and similar anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws.