Biggest changeThe direct premiums written for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 by state and line of insurance business were: Year Ended December 31, 2022 (Dollars in thousands) Private Passenger Automobile Homeowners Commercial Automobile Other Lines (2) Total California $ 2,142,265 $ 716,651 $ 193,809 $ 216,022 $ 3,268,747 80.8 % Texas 97,620 105,269 43,641 6,174 252,704 6.2 % Other states (1) 358,973 118,419 39,312 10,375 527,079 13.0 % Total $ 2,598,858 $ 940,339 $ 276,762 $ 232,571 $ 4,048,530 100.0 % 64.3 % 23.2 % 6.8 % 5.7 % 100.0 % Year Ended December 31, 2021 (Dollars in thousands) Private Passenger Automobile Homeowners Commercial Automobile Other Lines (2) Total California $ 2,286,017 $ 642,291 $ 181,957 $ 188,446 $ 3,298,711 84.4 % Other states (1) 354,730 159,197 77,916 16,975 608,818 15.6 % Total $ 2,640,747 $ 801,488 $ 259,873 $ 205,421 $ 3,907,529 100.0 % 67.6 % 20.5 % 6.6 % 5.3 % 100.0 % Year Ended December 31, 2020 (Dollars in thousands) Private Passenger Automobile Homeowners Commercial Automobile Other Lines Total California (3) $ 2,266,115 $ 579,747 $ 161,619 $ 149,627 $ 3,157,108 86.4 % Other states (1)(4) 302,819 99,194 79,169 15,871 497,053 13.6 % Total $ 2,568,934 $ 678,941 $ 240,788 $ 165,498 $ 3,654,161 100.0 % 70.3 % 18.6 % 6.6 % 4.5 % 100.0 % _____________ (1) No individual state accounted for more than 5% of total direct premiums written.
Biggest changeThe direct premiums written for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 by state and line of insurance business were: Year Ended December 31, 2023 (Dollars in thousands) Private Passenger Automobile Homeowners Commercial Automobile Other Lines (2) Total California $ 2,317,678 $ 813,056 $ 246,253 $ 235,735 $ 3,612,722 79.3 % Texas 123,390 147,854 53,430 5,592 330,266 7.2 % Other states (1) 400,714 158,094 46,538 10,154 615,500 13.5 % Total $ 2,841,782 $ 1,119,004 $ 346,221 $ 251,481 $ 4,558,488 100.0 % 62.4 % 24.5 % 7.6 % 5.5 % 100.0 % Year Ended December 31, 2022 (Dollars in thousands) Private Passenger Automobile Homeowners Commercial Automobile Other Lines (2) Total California $ 2,142,265 $ 716,651 $ 193,809 $ 216,022 $ 3,268,747 80.8 % Texas 97,620 105,269 43,641 6,174 252,704 6.2 % Other states (1) 358,973 118,419 39,312 10,375 527,079 13.0 % Total $ 2,598,858 $ 940,339 $ 276,762 $ 232,571 $ 4,048,530 100.0 % 64.3 % 23.2 % 6.8 % 5.7 % 100.0 % Year Ended December 31, 2021 (Dollars in thousands) Private Passenger Automobile Homeowners Commercial Automobile Other Lines (2) Total California $ 2,286,017 $ 642,291 $ 181,957 $ 188,446 $ 3,298,711 84.4 % Other states (1) 354,730 159,197 77,916 16,975 608,818 15.6 % Total $ 2,640,747 $ 801,488 $ 259,873 $ 205,421 $ 3,907,529 100.0 % 67.6 % 20.5 % 6.6 % 5.3 % 100.0 % _____________ (1) No individual state accounted for more than 5% of total direct premiums written.
In 2011, he became a board member of the Personal Insurance Federation of California. Mr. Toney is Mr. George Joseph’s nephew. Ms. Walters, Vice President, Corporate Affairs and Secretary, has been employed by the Company since 1967, and has served as its Secretary since 1982. Ms. Walters was named Vice President, Corporate Affairs in 1998.
In 2011, he became a board member of the Personal Insurance Federation of California. Mr. Toney is Mr. George Joseph’s nephew. Ms. Walters, Vice President, Corporate Affairs and Secretary, has been employed by the Company since 1967, and has served as its Secretary since 1982. Ms. Walters was named Vice President, Corporate Affairs in 1998. Mr.
During 2022, inflationary trends accelerated to their highest level in decades, which had a significant impact on the cost of automobile parts and labor as well as medical expenses for bodily injuries, and supply chain and labor shortage issues lengthened the time to repair vehicles. Bodily injury costs were also under pressure from social inflation.
Inflationary trends accelerated to their highest level in decades in 2022, which had a significant impact on the cost of automobile parts and labor as well as medical expenses for bodily injuries, and supply chain and labor shortage issues lengthened the time to repair vehicles. Bodily injury costs were also under pressure from social inflation.
(2) The Company has a per-risk reinsurance treaty covering losses of $5 million in excess of $5 million, and facultative reinsurance coverage for losses above $10 million. (3) The majority of the Company’s homeowners policies have liability coverage limits of $300,000 or less, a replacement value of $500,000 or less, and a total insured value of $1,000,000 or less.
(2) The Company has a per-risk reinsurance treaty covering losses of $10 million in excess of $5 million, and facultative reinsurance coverage for losses above $15 million. (3) The majority of the Company’s homeowners policies have liability coverage limits of $300,000 or less, a replacement value of $500,000 or less, and a total insured value of $1,000,000 or less.
No reinsurance benefits were available under the Treaty for these losses as none of the 2022 catastrophe events individually resulted in losses in excess of the Company’s per-occurrence retention limit of $60 million and $40 million under the Treaty for the 12 months ending June 30, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
No reinsurance benefits were available under the Treaty for these losses as none of the 2022 catastrophe events individually resulted in losses in excess 10 of the Company’s per-occurrence retention limit of $60 million and $40 million under the Treaty for the 12 months ending June 30, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Stalick, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, joined the Company as Corporate Controller in 1997. He was appointed Chief Accounting Officer in October 2000 and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in 2001. In July 2013, he was named Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Stalick is a Certified Public Accountant. Ms.
Stalick, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, joined the Company as Corporate Controller in 1997. He was appointed Chief Accounting Officer in October 2000 and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in 2001. In July 2013, he was named Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Stalick is a Certified Public Accountant. 13 Ms.
Victor Joseph, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, has been employed by the Company in various capacities since 2009, and was appointed Vice President and Chief Underwriting Officer in July 2017 and Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer in January 2022. Mr. Victor Joseph is Mr. George Joseph’s son. Mr.
Victor Joseph, President and Chief Operating Officer, has been employed by the Company in various capacities since 2009, and was appointed Vice President and Chief Underwriting Officer in July 2017, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer in January 2022, and President and Chief Operating Officer in January 2024. Mr. Victor Joseph is Mr. George Joseph’s son. Mr.
Butler, Vice President and Chief Underwriting Officer, joined the Company as a Casualty Claims Adjuster in 2004 and worked in various capacities including as Director of Personal Property Underwriting. Ms. Butler was appointed Vice President and Chief Underwriting Officer in January 2022. 13 Ms. Gibbs, Vice President and Chief Experience Officer, joined the Company in 2022.
Butler, Vice President and Chief Underwriting Officer, joined the Company as a Casualty Claims Adjuster in 2004 and worked in various capacities including as Director of Personal Property Underwriting. Ms. Butler was appointed Vice President and Chief Underwriting Officer in January 2022. Ms. Gibbs, Vice President and Chief Experience Officer, joined the Company in 2022.
The Company believes that it compensates its agents above the industry average. Net commissions incurred in 2022 were approximately 15% of net premiums written. The Company’s advertising budget is allocated among television, radio, newspaper, internet, and direct mailing media with the intent to provide the best coverage available within targeted media markets.
The Company believes that it compensates its agents above the industry average. Net commissions incurred in 2023 were approximately 15% of net premiums written. The Company’s advertising budget is allocated among television, radio, newspaper, internet, and direct mailing media with the intent to provide the best coverage available within targeted media markets.
The ORSA is intended to be used by state insurance regulators to evaluate the risk exposure and quality of the risk management processes within insurance companies to assist in conducting risk-focused financial examinations and for determining the overall financial condition of insurance companies. The Company filed its most recent ORSA Summary Report with the California DOI in November 2022.
The ORSA is intended to be used by state insurance regulators to evaluate the risk exposure and quality of the risk management processes within insurance companies to assist in conducting risk-focused financial examinations and for determining the overall financial condition of insurance companies. The Company filed its most recent ORSA Summary Report with the California DOI in November 2023.
("CGU") (1) 1985 A CA Mercury Insurance Company of Illinois 1989 A IL, NJ Mercury Insurance Company of Georgia 1989 A GA Mercury Indemnity Company of Georgia 1991 A GA American Mercury Insurance Company 1996 A- OK, CA, TX, VA American Mercury Lloyds Insurance Company ("AML") 1996 A- TX Mercury County Mutual Insurance Company 2000 A- TX Mercury Insurance Company of Florida ("MICFL") (2) 2001 A FL Mercury Indemnity Company of America 2001 A FL, NJ Orion Indemnity Company ("OIC") (1) 2015 A CA Non-Insurance Companies Formed or Acquired Purpose Mercury Select Management Company, Inc. 1997 AML’s attorney-in-fact Mercury Insurance Services LLC 2000 Management services to subsidiaries AIS Management LLC 2009 Parent company of AIS and PoliSeek Auto Insurance Specialists LLC ("AIS") 2009 Insurance agency PoliSeek AIS Insurance Solutions, Inc.
("CGU") (1) 1985 A CA Mercury Insurance Company of Illinois 1989 A IL, NJ Mercury Insurance Company of Georgia 1989 A GA Mercury Indemnity Company of Georgia 1991 A GA American Mercury Insurance Company 1996 A OK, CA, TX, VA American Mercury Lloyds Insurance Company ("AML") 1996 A TX Mercury County Mutual Insurance Company 2000 A TX Mercury Indemnity Company of America 2001 A FL, NJ Orion Indemnity Company ("OIC") (1) 2015 A CA Non-Insurance Companies Formed or Acquired Purpose Mercury Select Management Company, Inc. 1997 AML’s attorney-in-fact Mercury Insurance Services LLC 2000 Management services to subsidiaries AIS Management LLC 2009 Parent company of AIS and PoliSeek Auto Insurance Specialists LLC ("AIS") 2009 Insurance agency PoliSeek AIS Insurance Solutions, Inc.
(2) The reinstatement premium and the total combined premium for the treaty period ending June 30, 2023 are projected amounts to be paid based on the assumption that there will be no reinstatements occurring during this treaty period. The reinstatement premium for the treaty period ended June 30, 2022 is zero, as there were no actual reinstatement premiums paid.
(2) The reinstatement premium and the total combined premium for the treaty period ending June 30, 2024 are projected amounts to be paid based on the assumption that there will be no reinstatements occurring during this treaty period. The reinstatement premium for the treaty period ended June 30, 2023 is zero, as there were no actual reinstatement premiums paid.
There were no material CIGA assessments in 2022. The CEA is a quasi-governmental organization that was established to provide a market for earthquake coverage to California homeowners. The Company places all new and renewal earthquake coverage offered with its homeowner policy directly with the CEA.
There were no material CIGA assessments in 2023. The CEA is a quasi-governmental organization that was established to provide a market for earthquake coverage to California homeowners. The Company places all new and renewal earthquake coverage offered with its homeowner policy directly with the CEA.
The Company periodically monitors the RBC level of each of the Insurance Companies. As of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, each of the Insurance Companies exceeded the minimum required RBC level. For more detailed information, see "Liquidity and Capital Resources—F. Regulatory Capital Requirements" in "Item 7.
The Company periodically monitors the RBC level of each of the Insurance Companies. As of December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, each of the Insurance Companies exceeded the minimum required RBC level. For more detailed information, see "Liquidity and Capital Resources—F. Regulatory Capital Requirements" in "Item 7.
Catastrophe losses due to events that occurred in 2022 totaled approximately $101 million, w ith no reinsurance benefits used for these losses, resulting primarily from the deep freeze of Winter Storm Elliott and other extreme weather events in Texas, Oklahoma and Georgia, winter storms in California, and the impact of Hurricane Ian in Florida.
Catastrophe losses due to the events that occurred in 2022 totaled approximately $101 million, with no reinsurance benefits used for these losses, resulting primarily from the deep freeze of Winter Storm Elliott and other extreme weather events in Texas, Oklahoma and Georgia, winter storms in California, and the impact of Hurricane Ian in Florida.
Average annual yield on investments before and after income taxes for 2022 increased compared to 2021, primarily due to the maturity and replacement of lower yielding investments purchased when market interest rates were lower with higher yielding investments, as a result of increasing market interest rates, as well as higher yields on investments based on floating interest rates.
Average annual yield on investments before and after income taxes for 2023 increased compared to 2022, primarily due to the maturity and replacement of lower yielding investments purchased when market interest rates were lower with higher yielding investments, as a result of increasing overall market interest rates, as well as higher yields on investments based on floating interest rates.
There was no assessment made in 2022. The Insurance Companies in other states are also subject to the provisions of similar insurance guaranty associations. There were no material assessments or payments during 2022 in other states.
There was no assessment made in 2023. The Insurance Companies in other states are also subject to the provisions of similar insurance guaranty associations. There were no material assessments or payments during 2023 in other states.
The Company's private passenger automobile renewal rate in California (the rate of acceptance of offers to renew) averaged approximately 96%, 97%, and 96% in 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively. Claims The Company conducts the majority of claims processing without the assistance of outside adjusters. The claims staff administers all claims and manages all legal and adjustment aspects of claims processing.
The Company's private passenger automobile renewal rate in California (the rate of acceptance of offers to renew) averaged approximately 95%, 96%, and 97% in 2023, 2022, and 2021, respectively. Claims The Company conducts the majority of claims processing without the assistance of outside adjusters. The claims staff administers all claims and manages all legal and adjustment aspects of claims processing.
(3) Net investment income before and after income taxes for 2022 increased compared to 2021, primarily due to higher average yield combined with higher average invested assets.
(3) Net investment income before and after income taxes for 2023 increased compared to 2022, primarily due to higher average yield combined with higher average invested assets.
Reinstatement premiums are based on the amount of reinsurance benefits used by the Company at 100% of the annual premium rate, with the exception of the reinstatement restrictions noted in the tables above, up to the maximum reinstatement premium of approximately $72 million and $51 million if the full amount of benefit is used for the 12 months ending June 30, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Reinstatement premiums are based on the amount of reinsurance benefits used by the Company at 100% of the annual premium rate, with the exception of the reinstatement restrictions noted in the tables above, up to the maximum reinstatement premium of approximately $95 million and $72 million if the full amount of benefit is used for the 12 months ending June 30, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
The Company made direct financial contributions of approximately $83,000 and $54,000 to officeholders and candidates in 2022 and 2021, respectively. The Company believes in supporting the political process and intends to continue to make such contributions in amounts which it determines to be appropriate. The Insurance Companies must comply with minimum capital requirements under applicable state laws and regulations.
The Company made direct financial contributions of approximately $24,000 and $83,000 to officeholders and candidates in 2023 and 2022, respectively. The Company believes in supporting the political process and intends to continue to make such contributions in amounts which it determines to be appropriate. The Insurance Companies must comply with minimum capital requirements under applicable state laws and regulations.
In 2022, the Company incurred approximately $12 million in net advertising expense. Underwriting The Company sets its own automobile insurance premium rates, subject to rating regulations issued by the Department of Insurance or similar governmental agency of each state in which it is licensed to operate ("DOI"). Each state has different rate approval requirements.
In 2023, the Company incurred approximately $9 million in net advertising expense. Underwriting The Company sets its own automobile insurance premium rates, subject to rating regulations issued by the Department of Insurance or similar governmental agency of each state in which it is licensed to operate ("DOI"). Each state has different rate approval requirements.
The table below presents the combined total reinsurance premiums under the Treaty (annual premiums and reinstatement premiums) for the 12 months ending June 30, 2023 and 2022, respectively: Treaty Annual Premium (1) Reinstatement Premium (2) Total Combined Premium (2) (Amounts in millions) For the 12 months ending June 30, 2023 $ 74 $ — $ 74 For the 12 months ended June 30, 2022 $ 55 $ — $ 55 __________ (1) The increase in the annual premium is primarily due to higher reinsurance coverage and rates and growth in the covered book of business.
The table below presents the combined total reinsurance premiums under the Treaty (annual premiums and reinstatement premiums) for the 12 months ending June 30, 2024 and 2023, respectively: Treaty Annual Premium (1) Reinstatement Premium (2) Total Combined Premium (2) (Amounts in millions) For the 12 months ending June 30, 2024 $ 99 $ — $ 99 For the 12 months ended June 30, 2023 $ 74 $ — $ 74 __________ (1) The increase in the annual premium is primarily due to higher reinsurance coverage and rates and growth in the covered book of business.
Average invested assets at cost are based on the monthly amortized cost of the invested assets for each period. (2) At December 31, 2022, fixed maturity securities with call features totaled $3.1 billion at fair value and $3.2 billion at amortized cost.
Average invested assets at cost are based on the monthly amortized cost of the invested assets for each period. (2) At December 31, 2023, fixed maturity securities with call features totaled $3.2 billion at fair value and $3.3 billion at amortized cost.
Based on the most recent regularly published statistical compilations of premiums written in 2021, the Company was the sixth largest writer of private passenger automobile insurance in California and the sixteenth largest in the United States. The property and casualty insurance industry is highly cyclical, with alternating hard and soft market conditions.
Based on the most recent regularly published statistical compilations of premiums written in 2022, the Company was the seventh largest writer of private passenger automobile insurance in California and the sixteenth largest in the United States. The property and casualty insurance industry is highly cyclical, with alternating hard and soft market conditions.
The Treaty ending June 30, 2023 and 2022 each provides for one full reinstatement of coverage limits.
The Treaty ending June 30, 2024 and 2023 each provides for one full reinstatement of coverage limits.
(2) 33% of this layer covers California, Arizona and Nevada only. (3) Layer of Coverage represents multiple actual treaty layers that are grouped for presentation purposes.
(2) Approximately 30% of this layer covers California, Arizona and Nevada only. (3) Layer of Coverage represents multiple actual treaty layers that are grouped for presentation purposes.
These assessments are made after CEA capital has been expended and are based upon each company’s participation percentage multiplied by the amount of the total assessment. Based upon the most recent information provided by the CEA, the Company’s maximum total exposure to CEA assessments at April 30, 2022, the most recent date at which information was available, was $76.7 million.
These assessments are made after CEA capital has been expended and are based upon each company’s participation percentage multiplied by the amount of the total assessment. Based upon the most recent information provided by the CEA, the Company’s maximum total exposure to CEA assessments at April 30, 2023, the most recent date at which information was available, was $85.6 million.
Excluding AIS and PoliSeek, independent agents and agencies collectively accounted for approximately 88% of the Company's direct premiums written in 2022 and no single independent agent or agency accounted for more than 1.1% of the Company’s direct premiums written during any of the last three years.
Excluding AIS and PoliSeek, independent agents and agencies collectively accounted for approximately 89% of the Company's direct premiums written in 2023 and no single independent agent or agency accounted for more than 1.9% of the Company’s direct premiums written during any of the last three years.
While the majority of these advertising costs are borne by the Company, a portion of these costs are reimbursed by the Company’s independent agents based upon the number of account leads generated by the advertising. The Company believes that its advertising program is important to generate leads, create brand awareness, and remain competitive in the current insurance climate.
While the majority of these advertising costs are borne by the Company, a portion of these costs are reimbursed by the Company’s independent agents based upon the number of account leads generated by the advertising. The Company believes that its advertising program is important to generate leads and create brand awareness.
The catastrophe events that occurred in 2022 caused approximately $101 million in losses to the Company, resulting primarily from the deep freeze of Winter Storm Elliott and other extreme weather events in Texas, Oklahoma and Georgia, winter storms in California, and the impact of Hurricane Ian in Florida.
The catastrophe events that occurred in 2022 caused approximately $105 million in losses to the Company as of December 31, 2023, resulting primarily from the deep freeze of Winter Storm Elliott and other extreme weather events in Texas, Oklahoma and Georgia, winter storms in California, and the impact of Hurricane Ian in Florida.
The inflation, supply chain, and labor issues discussed above were major contributors to the adverse reserve development in the automobile line of insurance business for 2022.
The inflationary pressures and the supply chain and labor shortage issues discussed above were major contributors to the adverse reserve development in the automobile line of insurance business for 2022.
Year Ended December 31, 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 (Amounts in thousands, except ratios) Net premiums written $ 3,978,017 $ 3,855,369 $ 3,611,543 $ 3,731,723 $ 3,495,633 Policyholders’ surplus $ 1,502,424 $ 1,827,210 $ 1,768,103 $ 1,539,998 $ 1,471,547 Ratio 2.7 to 1 2.1 to 1 2.0 to 1 2.4 to 1 2.4 to 1 Investments The Company’s investments are directed by the Chief Investment Officer under the supervision of the Investment Committee of the Board of Directors.
Year Ended December 31, 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 (Amounts in thousands, except ratios) Net premiums written $ 4,464,199 $ 3,978,017 $ 3,855,369 $ 3,611,543 $ 3,731,723 Policyholders’ surplus $ 1,667,187 $ 1,502,424 $ 1,827,210 $ 1,768,103 $ 1,539,998 Ratio 2.7 to 1 2.7 to 1 2.1 to 1 2.0 to 1 2.4 to 1 Investments The Company’s investments are directed by the Chief Investment Officer under the supervision of the Investment Committee of the Board of Directors.
The Insurance Companies’ ratios (Company-wide) include lines of insurance business other than private passenger automobile that accounted for approximately 35.7% of direct premiums written in 2022; hence, the Company believes its combined ratio (for private passenger automobile only) is more comparable to the industry ratios.
The Insurance Companies’ ratios (Company-wide) include lines of insurance business other than private passenger automobile that accounted for approximately 37.6% of direct premiums written in 2023; hence, the Company believes its combined ratio (for private passenger automobile only) is more comparable to the industry ratios.
Year Ended December 31, 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 Loss ratio (Company-wide) 85.1 % 73.8 % 67.4 % 75.2 % 76.6 % Expense ratio (Company-wide) 24.4 % 24.9 % 26.2 % 24.5 % 24.5 % Combined ratio (Company-wide) (2) 109.5 % 98.7 % 93.6 % 99.7 % 101.0 % Combined ratio (Company's private passenger automobile only) 110.3 % 96.0 % 88.3 % 98.2 % 99.5 % Industry combined ratio (all writers) (1) N/A 100.7 % 90.5 % 98.1 % 97.3 % Industry combined ratio (excluding direct writers) (1) N/A 99.4 % 91.4 % 97.3 % 97.8 % ____________ (1) Source: A.M.
Year Ended December 31, 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 Loss ratio (Company-wide) 82.3 % 85.1 % 73.8 % 67.4 % 75.2 % Expense ratio (Company-wide) 23.5 % 24.4 % 24.9 % 26.2 % 24.5 % Combined ratio (Company-wide) 105.8 % 109.5 % 98.7 % 93.6 % 99.7 % Combined ratio (Company's private passenger automobile only) 103.0 % 110.3 % 96.0 % 88.3 % 98.2 % Industry combined ratio (all writers) (1) N/A 111.7 % 100.7 % 90.5 % 98.1 % Industry combined ratio (excluding direct writers) (1) N/A 104.6 % 99.4 % 91.4 % 97.3 % ____________ (1) Source: A.M.
Petro 59 Vice President and Chief Claims Officer Mark Ribisi 60 President and Chief Executive Officer of AIS Management LLC Jeffrey M. Schroeder 46 Vice President and Chief Product Officer Heidi C. Sullivan 54 Vice President and Chief Human Capital Officer Erik Thompson 54 Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer Charles Toney 61 Vice President and Chief Actuary Judy A.
Petro 60 Vice President and Chief Claims Officer Mark Ribisi 61 President and Chief Executive Officer of AIS Management LLC Jeffrey M. Schroeder 47 Vice President and Chief Product Officer Heidi C. Sullivan 55 Vice President and Chief Human Capital Officer Erik Thompson 55 Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer Charles Toney 62 Vice President and Chief Actuary Judy A.
The Company recognized $10.0 million and $12.5 million in earned premiums and $8.4 million and $17.5 million in incurred losses under the Contract for the 12 months ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The Company is party to a Catastrophe Reinsurance Treaty ("Treaty") covering a wide range of perils that is effective through June 30, 2023.
The Company recognized $15.0 million and $10.0 million in earned premiums and $9.6 million and $8.4 million in incurred losses under the Contract for the 12 months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The Company is the ceding party to a Catastrophe Reinsurance Treaty ("Treaty") covering a wide range of perils that is effective through June 30, 2024.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." Investment Results The following table presents the investment results of the Company for the most recent five years: Year Ended December 31, 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 (Dollars in thousands) Average invested assets at cost (1) (2) $ 4,902,755 $ 4,681,462 $ 4,291,888 $ 4,008,601 $ 3,740,497 Net investment income (3) Before income taxes $ 168,356 $ 129,727 $ 134,858 $ 141,263 $ 135,838 After income taxes $ 146,204 $ 115,216 $ 120,043 $ 125,637 $ 121,476 Average annual yield on investments (3) Before income taxes 3.4 % 2.8 % 3.1 % 3.5 % 3.6 % After income taxes 3.0 % 2.5 % 2.8 % 3.1 % 3.3 % Net realized investment (losses) gains after income taxes $ (385,583) $ 88,210 $ 67,727 $ 176,006 $ (105,481) __________ (1) Fixed maturities and short-term bonds at amortized cost; equities and other short-term investments at cost.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." Investment Results The following table presents the investment results of the Company for the most recent five years: Year Ended December 31, 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 (Dollars in thousands) Average invested assets at cost (1) (2) $ 5,096,428 $ 4,902,755 $ 4,681,462 $ 4,291,888 $ 4,008,601 Net investment income (3) Before income taxes $ 234,630 $ 168,356 $ 129,727 $ 134,858 $ 141,263 After income taxes $ 200,209 $ 146,204 $ 115,216 $ 120,043 $ 125,637 Average annual yield on investments (3) Before income taxes 4.6 % 3.4 % 2.8 % 3.1 % 3.5 % After income taxes 3.9 % 3.0 % 2.5 % 2.8 % 3.1 % Net realized investment gains (losses) after income taxes $ 79,801 $ (385,583) $ 88,210 $ 67,727 $ 176,006 __________ (1) Fixed maturities and short-term bonds at amortized cost; equities and other short-term investments at cost.
As of December 31, 2022, the Insurance Companies are permitted to pay in 2023, without obtaining DOI approval for extraordinary dividends, $151 million in dividends to Mercury General, of which $125 million may be paid by the California Companies.
As of December 31, 2023, the Insurance Companies are permitted to pay in 2024, without obtaining DOI approval for extraordinary dividends, $163 million in dividends to Mercury General, of which $140 million may be paid by the California Companies.
In California, "good drivers," as defined by the California Insurance Code, accounted for approximately 88% of the Company's California voluntary private passenger automobile policies-in-force at December 31, 2022, while higher risk categories accounted for approximately 12%.
In California, "good drivers," as defined by the California Insurance Code, accounted for approximately 87% of the Company's California voluntary private passenger automobile policies-in-force at December 31, 2023, while higher risk categories accounted for approximately 13%.
Coverage on individual catastrophes provided for the 12 months ending June 30, 2023 under the Treaty is presented below in various layers: Catastrophe Losses and LAE In Excess of Up to Percentage of Coverage (Amounts in millions) Retained $ — $ 60 — % Layer of Coverage 60 100 19.5 Layer of Coverage 100 200 98.8 Layer of Coverage (1) 200 530 98.6 Layer of Coverage (2) (3) (4) 530 930 100.0 Layer of Coverage 930 1,035 98.9 __________ (1) 5% of this layer covers California, Arizona and Nevada only.
(4) Approximately 10% of this layer covers only California wildfires and fires following an earthquake in California, and is not subject to reinstatement. 9 Coverage on individual catastrophes provided for the 12 months ended June 30, 2023 under the Treaty is presented below in various layers: Catastrophe Losses and LAE In Excess of Up to Percentage of Coverage (Amounts in millions) Retained $ — $ 60 — % Layer of Coverage 60 100 19.5 Layer of Coverage 100 200 98.8 Layer of Coverage (1) 200 530 98.6 Layer of Coverage (2) (3) (4) 530 930 100.0 Layer of Coverage 930 1,035 98.9 __________ (1) 5% of this layer covers California, Arizona and Nevada only.
These losses were partially offset by favorable development of approximately $5 million on prior years' catastrophe losses. Statutory Accounting Principles The Company’s results are reported in accordance with GAAP, which differ in some respects from amounts reported under SAP prescribed by insurance regulatory authorities.
In addition, the Company experienced favorable development of approximately $5 million on prior years' catastrophe losses in 2021. Statutory Accounting Principles The Company’s results are reported in accordance with GAAP, which differ in some respects from amounts reported under SAP prescribed by insurance regulatory authorities.
For the 12 months ending June 30, 2023 and 2022, the Treaty provides $936 million and $792 million of coverage, respectively, on a per occurrence basis after covered catastrophe losses exceed the Company retention limit of $60 million and $40 million, respectively.
For the 12 months ending June 30, 2024 and 2023, the Treaty provides $1,111 million and $936 million of coverage, respectively, on a per occurrence basis after covered catastrophe losses exceed the Company retention limit of $100 million and $60 million, respectively.
The Company recorded catastrophe losses net of reinsurance of approximately $102 million, $104 million, and $64 million in 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively.
The Company recorded catastrophe losses net of reinsurance of approximately $239 million, $102 million, and $104 million in 2023, 2022, and 2021, respectively.
Catastrophe losses due to the events that occurred in 2021 totaled approximately $109 million, with no reinsurance benefits used for these losses, resulting primarily from the deep freeze of Winter Storm Uri and other extreme weather events in Texas and Oklahoma, rainstorms, wildfires and winter storms in California, and the impact of Hurricane Ida in New Jersey and New York.
In addition, the Company experienced unfavorable development of approximately $1 million on prior years' catastrophe losses in 2022. 5 Catastrophe losses due to the events that occurred in 2021 totaled approximately $109 million, with no reinsurance benefits used for these losses, resulting primarily from the deep freeze of Winter Storm Uri and other extreme weather events in Texas and Oklahoma, rainstorms, wildfires and winter storms in California, and the impact of Hurricane Ida in New Jersey and New York.
He was appointed President and Chief Operating Officer in October 2001 and Chief Executive Officer in 2007. Mr. Tirador has over 25 years' experience in the property and casualty insurance industry and is an inactive Certified Public Accountant. Mr.
He rejoined the Company in 1998 as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. He was appointed President and Chief Operating Officer in October 2001 and Chief Executive Officer in 2007. Mr. Tirador has over 30 years' experience in the property and casualty insurance industry and is an inactive Certified Public Accountant. Mr.
Best, Aggregates & Averages (2018 through 2021), for all property and casualty insurance companies (private passenger automobile line only, after policyholder dividends). (2) Combined ratio for 2018 does not sum due to rounding. Premiums to Surplus Ratio The following table presents the Insurance Companies’ statutory ratios of net premiums written to policyholders’ surplus.
Best, Aggregates & Averages (2019 through 2022), for all property and casualty insurance companies (private passenger automobile line only, after policyholder dividends). Premiums to Surplus Ratio The following table presents the Insurance Companies’ statutory ratios of net premiums written to policyholders’ surplus.
Information about the Company's Executive Officers The following table presents certain information concerning the executive officers of the Company as of February 9, 2023: Name Age Position George Joseph 101 Chairman of the Board Gabriel Tirador 58 President and Chief Executive Officer Victor G. Joseph 36 Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Theodore R.
Information about the Company's Executive Officers The following table presents certain information concerning the executive officers of the Company as of February 8, 2024: Name Age Position George Joseph 102 Chairman of the Board Gabriel Tirador 59 Chief Executive Officer Victor G. Joseph 37 President and Chief Operating Officer Theodore R.
These factors contributed to higher losses and loss adjustment expenses related to the current accident year for 2022 compared to 2021 and 2020. The increase in the provision for insured events of prior years in 2022 of approximately $47.3 million primarily resulted from higher than estimated losses and loss adjustment expenses in the automobile line of insurance business.
The increase in the provision for insured events of prior years in 2022 of approximately $47.3 million primarily resulted from higher than estimated losses and loss adjustment expenses in the automobile line of insurance business.
The independent agents and agencies are independent contractors selected and contracted by the Company and generally also represent competing insurance companies. Certain of these independent agencies are under the common ownership of a parent company; however, they each operate autonomously with their own contractual agreements with the Company and hence are accounted for as separate independent agencies.
Certain of these independent agencies are under the common ownership of a parent company; however, they each operate autonomously with their own contractual agreements with the Company and hence are accounted for as separate independent agencies.
No reinsurance benefits were available under the Treaty for these losses as none of the 2021 catastrophe events 10 individually resulted in losses in excess of the Company’s per-occurrence retention limit of $40 million under the Treaty for each of the 12 months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021.
No reinsurance benefits were available under the Treaty for these losses as none of the 2023 catastrophe events individually resulted in losses in excess of the Company’s per-occurrence retention limit of $100 million and $60 million under the Treaty for the 12 months ending June 30, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
However, the Company is required to discount loss reserves for federal income tax purposes. 4 The following table provides a reconciliation of beginning and ending estimated reserve balances for the years indicated: RECONCILIATION OF NET LOSS AND LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSE RESERVES Year Ended December 31, 2022 2021 2020 (Amounts in thousands) Gross reserves at January 1 (1) $ 2,226,430 $ 1,991,304 $ 1,921,255 Reinsurance recoverables on unpaid losses (41,379) (54,461) (76,100) Cumulative effect of adopting ASU 2016-13 — — 149 Reinsurance recoverables on unpaid losses, as adjusted (41,379) (54,461) (75,951) Net reserves at January 1, as adjusted (1) 2,185,051 1,936,843 1,845,304 Incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses related to: Current year 3,314,938 2,786,246 2,372,364 Prior years 47,281 (26,091) 22,979 Total incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses 3,362,219 2,760,155 2,395,343 Loss and loss adjustment expense payments related to: Current year 1,862,006 1,601,998 1,366,661 Prior years 1,125,677 909,949 937,143 Total payments 2,987,683 2,511,947 2,303,804 Net reserves at December 31 (1) 2,559,587 2,185,051 1,936,843 Reinsurance recoverables on unpaid losses 25,323 41,379 54,461 Gross reserves at December 31 (1) $ 2,584,910 $ 2,226,430 $ 1,991,304 _____________ (1) Under statutory accounting principles ("SAP"), reserves are stated net of reinsurance recoverables on unpaid losses whereas under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), reserves are stated gross of reinsurance recoverables on unpaid losses.
However, the Company is required to discount loss reserves for federal income tax purposes. 4 The following table provides a reconciliation of beginning and ending estimated reserve balances for the years indicated: RECONCILIATION OF NET LOSS AND LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSE RESERVES Year Ended December 31, 2023 2022 2021 (Amounts in thousands) Gross reserves at January 1 (1) $ 2,584,910 $ 2,226,430 $ 1,991,304 Reinsurance recoverables on unpaid losses (25,323) (41,379) (54,461) Net reserves at January 1 (1) 2,559,587 2,185,051 1,936,843 Incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses related to: Current year 3,553,801 3,314,938 2,786,246 Prior years (35,948) 47,281 (26,091) Total incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses 3,517,853 3,362,219 2,760,155 Loss and loss adjustment expense payments related to: Current year 2,080,690 1,862,006 1,601,998 Prior years 1,243,196 1,125,677 909,949 Total payments 3,323,886 2,987,683 2,511,947 Net reserves at December 31 (1) 2,753,554 2,559,587 2,185,051 Reinsurance recoverables on unpaid losses 32,148 25,323 41,379 Gross reserves at December 31 (1) $ 2,785,702 $ 2,584,910 $ 2,226,430 _____________ (1) Under statutory accounting principles ("SAP"), reserves are stated net of reinsurance recoverables on unpaid losses whereas under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), reserves are stated gross of reinsurance recoverables on unpaid losses.
In addition, the Company experienced unfavorable development of approximately $1 million on prior years' catastrophe losses in 2022.
In addition, the Company experienced favorable development of approximately $8 million on prior years' catastrophe losses in 2023.
Walters 76 Vice President, Corporate Affairs and Secretary Mr. George Joseph, Chairman of the Board of Directors, has served in this capacity since 1961. He held the position of Chief Executive Officer of the Company for 45 years from 1961 through 2006. Mr. Joseph has more than 50 years’ experience in the property and casualty insurance business. Mr.
Walters 77 Vice President, Corporate Affairs and Secretary Simon Zhang 47 Vice President and Chief Data & Analytics Officer Mr. George Joseph, Chairman of the Board of Directors, has served in this capacity since 1961. He held the position of Chief Executive Officer of the Company for 45 years from 1961 through 2006. Mr.
The Company had no capital loss carryforward at December 31, 2022. 7 Investment Portfolio The following table presents the composition of the Company’s total investment portfolio: December 31, 2022 2021 2020 Cost (1) Fair Value Cost (1) Fair Value Cost (1) Fair Value (Amounts in thousands) Taxable bonds $ 1,758,853 $ 1,649,078 $ 1,640,945 $ 1,632,358 $ 936,762 $ 943,836 Tax-exempt state and municipal bonds 2,467,937 2,439,233 2,268,835 2,399,165 2,451,656 2,605,974 Total fixed maturities 4,226,790 4,088,311 3,909,780 4,031,523 3,388,418 3,549,810 Equity securities 668,843 699,552 754,536 970,939 695,150 803,851 Short-term investments 123,928 122,937 141,206 140,127 376,547 375,609 Total investments $ 5,019,561 $ 4,910,800 $ 4,805,522 $ 5,142,589 $ 4,460,115 $ 4,729,270 __________ (1) Fixed maturities and short-term bonds at amortized cost; equities and other short-term investments at cost.
The Company had no capital loss carryforward at December 31, 2023. 7 Investment Portfolio The following table presents the composition of the Company’s total investment portfolio: December 31, 2023 2022 2021 Cost (1) Fair Value Cost (1) Fair Value Cost (1) Fair Value (Amounts in thousands) Taxable bonds $ 2,102,740 $ 2,031,594 $ 1,758,853 $ 1,649,078 $ 1,640,945 $ 1,632,358 Tax-exempt state and municipal bonds 2,292,243 2,287,742 2,467,937 2,439,233 2,268,835 2,399,165 Total fixed maturities 4,394,983 4,319,336 4,226,790 4,088,311 3,909,780 4,031,523 Equity securities 654,939 730,693 668,843 699,552 754,536 970,939 Short-term investments 179,375 178,491 123,928 122,937 141,206 140,127 Total investments $ 5,229,297 $ 5,228,520 $ 5,019,561 $ 4,910,800 $ 4,805,522 $ 5,142,589 __________ (1) Fixed maturities and short-term bonds at amortized cost; equities and other short-term investments at cost.
Stalick 59 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Kelly Butler 40 Vice President and Chief Underwriting Officer Katie Gibbs 33 Vice President and Chief Experience Officer Christopher Graves 57 Vice President and Chief Investment Officer Brandt N. Minnich 56 Vice President and Chief Sales Development Officer Randall R.
Stalick 60 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Kelly Butler 41 Vice President and Chief Underwriting Officer Katie Gibbs 34 Vice President and Chief Experience Officer Christopher Graves 58 Vice President and Chief Investment Officer Brandt N. Minnich 57 Vice President and Chief Sales Development Officer Wilson Pang 47 Vice President and Chief Technology Officer Randall R.
The Company devotes extensive resources to employee training and development, including tuition assistance for career-enhancing academic and professional programs. The Company recognizes that its success is based on the talents and dedication of those it employs, and it is highly invested in their success. The Company is committed to hiring, developing and supporting a diverse and inclusive workplace.
The Company recognizes that its success is based on the talents and dedication of those it employs, and it is highly invested in their success. The Company is committed to hiring, developing and supporting a diverse and inclusive workplace.
The Company also owns office buildings in Rancho Cucamonga and Folsom, California, which are used to support California operations, and in Clearwater, Florida and in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, which support the Company's operations outside of California and house several third party tenants.
The Company also owns an office building in Folsom, California, which is used to support California operations, and another in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, which supports the Company's operations outside of California and houses several third party tenants.
Tirador, President and Chief Executive Officer, served as the Company’s assistant controller from 1994 to 1996. In 1997 and 1998, he served as the Vice President and Controller of the Automobile Club of Southern California. He rejoined the Company in 1998 as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Joseph has more than 60 years’ experience in the property and casualty insurance business. Mr. Tirador, Chief Executive Officer, served as the Company’s assistant controller from 1994 to 1996. In 1997 and 1998, he served as the Vice President and Controller of the Automobile Club of Southern California.
All of the Company's employees are expected to exhibit and promote honest, ethical and respectful conduct in the workplace, must adhere to a code of conduct that sets standards for appropriate behavior, and are required to take annual training on preventing, identifying, reporting and stopping any type of unlawful discrimination. 2 The Company sponsors a wellness program designed to enhance physical, financial and mental well-being for all of its employees, and encourages healthy behaviors through regular communications, educational sessions, voluntary progress tracking, wellness challenges, and other incentives.
All of the Company's employees are expected to exhibit and promote honest, ethical and respectful conduct in the workplace, must adhere to a code of conduct that sets standards for appropriate behavior, and are required to take annual training on preventing, identifying, reporting and stopping any type of unlawful discrimination.
The increase in the provision for insured events of prior years in 2020 of approximately $23.0 million primarily resulted from higher than estimated losses and loss adjustment expenses in the homeowners and commercial automobile lines of insurance business.
The decrease in the provision for insured events of prior years in 2023 of approximately $35.9 million primarily resulted from lower than estimated losses and loss adjustment expenses in the private passenger automobile and homeowners lines of insurance business, partially offset by unfavorable reserve development in the commercial property line of insurance business.
(4) 6.3% of this layer covers only California wildfires and fires following an earthquake in California, and is not subject to reinstatement. 9 Coverage on individual catastrophes provided for the 12 months ended June 30, 2022 under the Treaty is presented below in various layers: Catastrophe Losses and LAE In Excess of Up to Percentage of Coverage (Amounts in millions) Retained $ — $ 40 — % Layer of Coverage 40 100 70 Layer of Coverage (1)(2) 100 450 100 Layer of Coverage (1) (3) (4)(5) 450 850 100 __________ (1) Layer of Coverage represents multiple actual treaty layers that are grouped for presentation purposes.
Coverage on individual catastrophes provided for the 12 months ending June 30, 2024 under the Treaty is presented below in various layers: Catastrophe Losses and LAE In Excess of Up to Percentage of Coverage (Amounts in millions) Retained $ — $ 100 — % Layer of Coverage 100 140 5.0 Layer of Coverage (1) (3) 140 610 100.0 Layer of Coverage (2) (3) (4) 610 1,120 99.8 Layer of Coverage 1,120 1,250 100.0 __________ (1) Approximately 4% of this layer covers California, Arizona and Nevada only.
In addition, the Company reviews its staffing levels periodically to ensure they are aligned with its business needs. The Company also reviews employee engagement and satisfaction surveys to monitor employee morale and receive feedback on a variety of issues, in order to improve the employee experience and identify opportunities to continually strengthen its culture.
The Company also reviews employee engagement and satisfaction surveys to monitor employee morale and receive feedback on a variety of issues, in order to improve the employee experience and identify opportunities to continually strengthen its culture. The Company devotes extensive resources to employee training and development, including tuition assistance for career-enhancing academic and professional programs.
The catastrophe events that occurred in 2021 caused approximately $113 million in losses to the Company as of December 31, 2022, resulting primarily from the deep freeze of Winter Storm Uri and other extreme weather events in Texas and Oklahoma, rainstorms, wildfires and winter storms in California, and the impact of Hurricane Ida in New Jersey and New York.
The catastrophe events that occurred in 2023 caused approximately $247 million in losses to the Company, resulting primarily from rainstorms and hail in Texas and Oklahoma, winter storms and rainstorms in California, and the impact of Tropical Storm Hilary in California.
Individual goals are set annually for each employee, and attainment of those goals is an element of the employee’s performance assessment. The Company regularly reviews its compensation practices, both in terms of its overall workforce and individual employees, to ensure its pay is fair and equitable.
The Company regularly reviews its compensation practices, both in terms of its overall workforce and individual employees, to ensure its pay is fair and equitable. In addition, the Company reviews its staffing levels periodically to ensure they are aligned with its business needs.
The Company offers the following types of homeowners coverage: dwelling, liability, personal property, fire, and other hazards.
The Company offers the following types of automobile coverage: collision, property damage, bodily injury ("BI"), comprehensive, personal injury protection ("PIP"), underinsured and uninsured motorist, and other hazards. 1 The Company offers the following types of homeowners coverage: dwelling, liability, personal property, and other coverages.
(2) 4.1% of this layer excludes Texas. (3) 11.9% of this layer excludes Texas. (4) 15.0% of this layer covers California, Arizona and Nevada only. (5) 12.7% of this layer covers only California wildfires and fires following an earthquake in California, and is not subject to reinstatement.
(2) 33% of this layer covers California, Arizona and Nevada only. (3) Layer of Coverage represents multiple actual treaty layers that are grouped for presentation purposes. (4) 6.3% of this layer covers only California wildfires and fires following an earthquake in California, and is not subject to reinstatement.
However, the Company continues to have catastrophe exposure to fires following an earthquake. For more detailed discussion, see "Regulation—Insurance Assessments" below. The Company is the assuming reinsurer under a Catastrophe Portfolio Participation Reinsurance Contract ("Contract") effective through December 31, 2025.
The Company is the assuming reinsurer under a Catastrophe Portfolio Participation Reinsurance Contract ("Contract") effective through December 31, 2025.
The Company has historically seen premium growth during hard market conditions. The Company believes that the automobile insurance market in most states has hardened during 2022 as insurance carriers began to increase rates reflecting high loss severity and increasing loss frequency as the country emerged from the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Company has historically seen premium growth during hard market conditions. The Company believes that the automobile insurance market in most states was hard during 2023 as insurance carriers increased rates reflecting high inflation and loss severity and tightened their underwriting. In addition, in California, several insurance carriers stopped writing new business policies.
("PoliSeek") 2009 Insurance agency Animas Funding LLC ("AFL") 2013 Special purpose investment vehicle Fannette Funding LLC ("FFL") 2014 Special purpose investment vehicle Mercury Plus Insurance Services LLC 2018 Insurance agency _____________ (1) The term "California Companies" refers to MCC, MIC, CAIC, CGU, and OIC.
("PoliSeek") 2009 Insurance agency Animas Funding LLC ("AFL") 2013 Special purpose investment vehicle Fannette Funding LLC ("FFL") 2014 Special purpose investment vehicle Mercury Plus Insurance Services LLC 2018 Insurance agency Mercury Information Technology Services LLC 2023 Parent company of Mercury Shanghai Mercury (Shanghai) Information Technology Services Co., Ltd.
The Company maintains branch offices in a number of locations in California; Clearwater, Florida; Bridgewater, New Jersey; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; and Austin and San Antonio, Texas. Human Capital The Company had approximately 4,300 employees at December 31, 2022. The Company's employees are critical to its continued success, and it focuses significant attention on attracting and retaining talented and motivated individuals.
The Company maintains branch offices in a number of locations in California; Clearwater, Florida; Kennesaw, Georgia; Lake Forest, Illinois; Las Vegas, Nevada; Bridgewater, New Jersey; Melville, New York; Independence, Ohio; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; Austin, Texas; and Shanghai, China. Human Capital The Company had approximately 4,100 employees at December 31, 2023.
The Company pays its employees fairly and competitively and offers a wide range of benefits regardless of gender, race or ethnicity. The Company benchmarks and sets pay ranges based on market data and considering such factors as employees' roles, experiences and performance, and the location of their job.
The Company benchmarks and sets pay ranges based on market data and considering such factors as employees' roles, experiences and performance, and the location of their job. Individual goals are set annually for each employee, and attainment of those goals is an element of the employee’s performance assessment.
(2) MICFL was dissolved in November 2022. 3 Production and Servicing of Business The Company sells its policies through a network of approximately 7,450 independent agents, its 100% owned insurance agencies, AIS and PoliSeek, and directly through internet sales portals. Approximately 1,900, 1,270, and 1,240 of the independent agents are located in California, Florida, and Texas, respectively.
("Mercury Shanghai") 2024 Software development and related technical services to other subsidiaries _____________ (1) The term "California Companies" refers to MCC, MIC, CAIC, CGU, and OIC. 3 Production and Servicing of Business The Company sells its policies through a network of approximately 6,390 independent agents, its 100% owned insurance agencies, AIS and PoliSeek, and directly through internet sales portals.
These losses were partially offset by favorable development of approximately $5 million on prior years' catastrophe losses. Catastrophe losses due to the events that occurred in 2020 totaled approximately $69 5 million, with no reinsurance benefits used for these losses, resulting primarily from wildfires and windstorms in California and extreme weather events outside of California.
Catastrophe losses due to events that occurred in 2023 totaled approximately $247 million, w ith no reinsurance benefits used for these losses, resulting primarily from rainstorms and hail in Texas and Oklahoma, winter storms and rainstorms in California, and the impact of Tropical Storm Hilary in California.
In California, market conditions in 2022 were hard as companies tightened their underwriting due to difficulty in obtaining regulatory approval for rate increases. Reinsurance For California homeowners policies, the Company has reduced its catastrophe exposure from earthquakes by placing earthquake risks directly with the California Earthquake Authority ("CEA").
Reinsurance For California homeowners policies, the Company has reduced its catastrophe exposure from earthquakes by placing earthquake risks directly with the California Earthquake Authority ("CEA"). However, the Company continues to have catastrophe exposure to fires following an earthquake. For more detailed discussion, see "Regulation—Insurance Assessments" below.
The Company implemented safety protocols and new procedures to protect its employees and customers in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This includes having the vast majority of its employees work from home or anywhere in the U.S., while implementing safety measures for employees working on-site. Available Information The Company’s website address is www.mercuryinsurance.com .
The vast majority of the Company's employees currently work from home 2 as a result of the "Mercury's My Workplace" policy that allows most of its employees to work from anywhere in the U.S.. Available Information The Company’s website address is www.mercuryinsurance.com .