vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Adobe Inc. (ADBE) and Arista Networks (ANET), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Adobe Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.4B vs $2.5B, roughly 2.6× Arista Networks). Arista Networks runs the higher net margin — 29.5% vs 38.4%, a 8.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Arista Networks posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.9% vs 12.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Arista Networks's revenue compounded faster (25.8% CAGR vs 9.8%).
Adobe Inc., formerly Adobe Systems Incorporated, is an American multinational computer software company based in San Jose, California. It offers a wide range of programs from web design tools, photo manipulation, and vector creation to video and audio editing, mobile app development, print layout, and animation software.
Arista Networks, Inc. is an American computer networking company headquartered in Santa Clara, California. The company designs and sells multilayer network switches to deliver software-defined networking (SDN) for large datacenter, cloud computing, high-performance computing, and high-frequency trading environments. These products include 10/25/40/50/100/200/400/800 gigabit low-latency cut-through Ethernet switches. Arista's Linux-based network operating system, Extensible Operating System (E...
ADBE vs ANET — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.4B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $1.9B | $955.8M |
| Gross Margin | 89.6% | 62.9% |
| Operating Margin | 37.8% | 41.5% |
| Net Margin | 29.5% | 38.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | 28.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4.3% | 19.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.60 | $0.74 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $6.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.0B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $955.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $853.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $888.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $813.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $801.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $747.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $665.4M |
| Q1 26 | 89.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 89.5% | 62.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 89.3% | 64.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 89.1% | 65.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 89.1% | 63.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 89.0% | 63.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 89.8% | 64.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 88.7% | 64.9% |
| Q1 26 | 37.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 36.5% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.3% | 42.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.9% | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.9% | 42.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.9% | 41.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.8% | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.5% | 41.4% |
| Q1 26 | 29.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.0% | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.6% | 37.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.8% | 40.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.7% | 40.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.0% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.1% | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.6% | 39.4% |
| Q1 26 | $4.60 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.44 | $0.74 | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.18 | $0.67 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.94 | $0.70 | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.14 | $0.64 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.75 | $-4.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.76 | $2.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.49 | $2.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $6.9B | $2.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.4B | $12.4B |
| Total Assets | $29.7B | $19.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.47× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q1 26 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.9B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.9B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.1B | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $11.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.6B | $12.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.8B | $11.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.4B | $10.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.1B | $10.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.1B | $10.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5B | $9.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | $8.4B |
| Q1 26 | $29.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.5B | $19.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.8B | $18.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.1B | $16.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.0B | $14.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.2B | $14.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.8B | $12.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.0B | $11.6B |
| Q1 26 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.28× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.0B | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.9B | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 45.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 0.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 1.57× | 1.32× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $10.3B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $641.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $989.0M |
| Q1 26 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $613.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $985.9M |
| Q1 26 | 45.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 50.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.5% | 53.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.5% | 53.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.0% | 30.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.3% | 64.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.8% | 58.3% |
| Q1 26 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | 1.57× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.70× | 1.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.24× | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.30× | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.37× | 0.79× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.20× | 1.57× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.23× | 1.49× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ADBE
| Subscription Revenue | $6.2B | 97% |
| Service Other | $110.0M | 2% |
| Products | $90.0M | 1% |
ANET
| Products | $2.1B | 84% |
| Services | $392.1M | 16% |
