vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AES Corporation (AES) and TRANSALTA CORP (TAC), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
The AES Corporation is an American utility and power generation company. It owns and operates power plants, which it uses to generate and sell electricity to end users and intermediaries like utilities and industrial facilities. AES, headquartered in Arlington, Virginia, is one of the world's leading power companies, generating and distributing electric power in 15 countries and employing 10,500 people worldwide. AES Corporation is a global Fortune 500 power company.
TransAlta Corporation is an electricity power generator and wholesale marketing company headquartered in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. It is a privately owned corporation and its shares are traded publicly. It operates 76 power plants in Canada, the United States, and Australia. TransAlta operates wind, hydro, natural gas, and coal power generation facilities. The company has been recognized for its leadership in sustainability by the Dow Jones Sustainability North America Index, the FTSE4Good In...
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $320.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $639.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-95.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $560.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $502.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $185.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $432.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 18.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -8.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.45 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.89 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.15 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.07 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.78 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.71 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.27 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.60 | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
