vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of 西联汇款 (AFG) and ALERUS FINANCIAL CORP (ALRS), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
西联汇款 is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $45.2M, roughly 45.7× ALERUS FINANCIAL CORP). 西联汇款 runs the higher net margin — 14.5% vs -73.2%, a 87.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ALERUS FINANCIAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.0% vs -4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, ALERUS FINANCIAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (42.6% CAGR vs 4.0%).
西联汇款是总部位于美国科罗拉多州丹佛市的跨国金融服务企业，为全球个人及商业客户提供跨境汇款、支付等多元金融解决方案，在全球绝大多数国家和地区拥有覆盖广泛的服务网络。
阿勒鲁斯金融公司（品牌简称Alerus）是一家连锁金融机构，总部位于北达科他州大福克斯，网点分布在北达科他、明尼苏达、威斯康星与亚利桑那州，为客户提供银行、抵押贷款、财富管理以及退休规划等多种金融服务。
AFG vs ALRS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.1B | $45.2M |
| Net Profit | $299.0M | $-33.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 18.4% | -96.0% |
| Net Margin | 14.5% | -73.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.0% | 18.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 17.3% | -49232.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.59 | $-1.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $45.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $43.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $43.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $41.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $38.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $22.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $24.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | $22.2M |
| Q4 25 | $299.0M | $-33.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $215.0M | $16.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $174.0M | $20.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $154.0M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $255.0M | $-67.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $181.0M | $5.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $209.0M | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $242.0M | $6.4M |
| Q4 25 | 18.4% | -96.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | 51.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | 61.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.6% | 42.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.9% | -0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | 30.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.3% | 33.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.9% | 38.4% |
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | -73.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.2% | 39.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 47.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | 32.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.9% | -0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.6% | 23.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.0% | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.7% | 28.9% |
| Q4 25 | $3.59 | $-1.27 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.58 | $0.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.07 | $0.78 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.84 | $0.52 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.03 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.16 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.49 | $0.31 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.89 | $0.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.7B | $67.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.8B | $59.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.8B | $564.9M |
| Total Assets | $32.6B | $5.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.38× | 0.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $67.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $92.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $80.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $83.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $61.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $66.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $438.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $545.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $59.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $59.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $59.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $59.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $59.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $59.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $59.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $59.0M |
| Q4 25 | $4.8B | $564.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7B | $550.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $533.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | $514.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $495.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.7B | $386.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | $373.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2B | $371.6M |
| Q4 25 | $32.6B | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.8B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.7B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.3B | $5.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.8B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.6B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.9B | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.0B | $4.3B |
| Q4 25 | 0.38× | 0.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.38× | 0.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.33× | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.34× | 0.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.33× | 0.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.31× | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | 0.16× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.35× | 0.16× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $784.0M | $16.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $15.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 33.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | — | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 2.62× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $58.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $784.0M | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $216.0M | $32.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $191.0M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $342.0M | $7.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0M | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $459.0M | $20.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-88.0M | $-12.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $107.0M | $11.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $15.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $30.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-16.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 33.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 70.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -7.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 77.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -67.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 48.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.62× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.00× | 1.94× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.10× | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.22× | 0.58× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.64× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.54× | 3.88× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.42× | -2.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.44× | 1.82× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AFG
Segment breakdown not available.
ALRS
| Other | $17.3M | 38% |
| Retirement And Benefit Services | $17.3M | 38% |
| Wealth Management | $7.4M | 16% |
| Mortgage Banking | $3.2M | 7% |
