vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AGCO CORP /DE (AGCO) and Atlas Lithium Corp (ATLX), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AGCO CORP /DE is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.9B vs $42.0K, roughly 69573.3× Atlas Lithium Corp). AGCO CORP /DE runs the higher net margin — 3.3% vs -17708.6%, a 17711.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AGCO CORP /DE posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.1% vs -73.0%). AGCO CORP /DE produced more free cash flow last quarter ($675.0M vs $-7.0M). Over the past eight quarters, AGCO CORP /DE's revenue compounded faster (-0.1% CAGR vs -55.6%).
AGCO Corporation is an American agricultural machinery manufacturer headquartered in Duluth, Georgia, United States. It was founded in 1990. AGCO designs, produces and sells tractors, combines, foragers, hay tools, self-propelled sprayers, smart farming technologies, seeding equipment, and tillage equipment.
Atlas Copco Group is a Swedish multinational industrial company. It manufactures compressors, vacuum equipment, pumps, generators, assembly tools, quality assurance equipment and other products and systems for industrial applications and mobile power generation. The products are sold in around 180 countries.
AGCO vs ATLX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.9B | $42.0K |
| Net Profit | $95.5M | $-7.4M |
| Gross Margin | 25.4% | 51.1% |
| Operating Margin | 7.9% | -18376.1% |
| Net Margin | 3.3% | -17708.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.1% | -73.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 137.3% | 35.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.30 | $-0.33 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $42.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $-1 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $43.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $36.4K | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $155.6K | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $178.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $202.3K | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | $212.8K |
| Q4 25 | $95.5M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $305.7M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $314.8M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-255.7M | $-11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.0M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-367.1M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $168.0M | $-13.0M |
| Q4 25 | 25.4% | 51.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.0% | -42.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.4% | -172.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.9% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.2% | 39.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.8% | 45.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.3% | 39.8% |
| Q4 25 | 7.9% | -18376.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 799268600.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | -14241.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | -26969.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.3% | -6980.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | -5767.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.4% | -4719.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.3% | -6195.7% |
| Q4 25 | 3.3% | -17708.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.3% | 695327600.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | -12931.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | -24754.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.9% | -7426.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | -5073.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.3% | -4534.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.7% | -6093.1% |
| Q4 25 | $1.30 | $-0.33 | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.09 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.22 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.14 | $-0.55 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.42 | $-0.62 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.40 | $-0.60 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.92 | $-0.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.25 | $-1.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $861.8M | $35.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.3B | $52.0M |
| Total Assets | $11.9B | $87.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.56× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $861.8M | $35.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $884.1M | $21.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $783.9M | $13.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $562.6M | $14.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $612.7M | $15.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $622.6M | $22.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $657.3M | $32.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5B | $17.5M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.7B | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | $52.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5B | $34.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | $25.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $23.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $21.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $23.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1B | $27.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.8B | $561.9K |
| Q4 25 | $11.9B | $87.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.5B | $72.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3B | $63.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.5B | $60.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.2B | $57.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.5B | $60.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.6B | $63.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.5B | $37.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.95× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.95× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.78× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $763.6M | $-6.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $675.0M | $-7.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 23.1% | -16667.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 3.0% | 463.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 8.00× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $740.2M | $-28.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $763.6M | $-6.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.0M | $-7.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $365.7M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-212.2M | $-4.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $797.9M | $-4.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.5M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $235.5M | $-5.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-370.0M | $-6.1M |
| Q4 25 | $675.0M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.5M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-260.4M | $-7.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $683.9M | $-7.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-59.8M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $137.5M | $-13.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-465.0M | $-12.0M |
| Q4 25 | 23.1% | -16667.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 822801700.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.3% | -12685.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.7% | -20812.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.7% | -5043.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.3% | -4559.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | -6576.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -15.9% | -5621.0% |
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 463.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | -116975500.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 3605.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 8722.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | 2105.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 2918.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 4011.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.2% | 2752.4% |
| Q4 25 | 8.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.16× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -20.21× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.20× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
