vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amber International Holding Ltd (AMBR) and MANHATTAN ASSOCIATES INC (MANH), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MANHATTAN ASSOCIATES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($270.4M vs $1.9M, roughly 144.0× Amber International Holding Ltd). MANHATTAN ASSOCIATES INC runs the higher net margin — 1.5% vs 19.2%, a 17.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Amber Road, Inc. (NYSE: AMBR) was a US-based software company specializing in Global Trade Management (GTM) solutions. It was acquired by E2open in 2019.
Computer Associates International, Inc., later CA, Inc., and CA Technologies, Inc., was an American multinational enterprise software developer and publisher that existed from 1976 to 2018. CA grew to rank as one of the largest independent software corporations in the world, and at one point was the second largest. The company created systems software that ran in IBM mainframe, distributed computing, virtual machine, and cloud computing environments.
AMBR vs MANH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9M | $270.4M |
| Net Profit | $28.0K | $52.0M |
| Gross Margin | 39.9% | 55.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | 1.5% | 19.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 5.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 8.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.86 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $270.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $275.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9M | $272.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $262.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $255.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $266.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $265.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $254.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $52.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $58.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.0K | $56.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $52.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $48.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $63.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $52.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $53.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 55.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 56.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | 57.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 56.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 55.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 55.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 54.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 53.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 22.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 19.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 20.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 21.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.86 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.96 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.93 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.85 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.77 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.85 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.86 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $25.8M | $328.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $91.3M | $314.8M |
| Total Assets | $248.2M | $839.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | — | $328.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $263.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.8M | $230.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $205.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $266.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $215.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $202.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $207.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $314.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $309.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.3M | $278.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $245.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $299.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $278.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $240.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $239.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $839.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $768.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $248.2M | $744.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $708.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $757.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $698.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $665.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $674.8M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-426 | $147.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $142.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 52.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | — | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | -0.02× | 2.83× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $374.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | — | $147.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $93.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-426 | $74.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $75.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $104.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $62.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $73.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $54.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $142.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $87.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $70.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $74.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $101.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $71.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $52.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 52.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 28.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 39.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 26.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 20.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.02× | 1.30× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.39× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.02× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMBR
Segment breakdown not available.
MANH
| Service Other | $120.0M | 44% |
| Cloud Subscriptions | $108.6M | 40% |
| Maintenance | $32.3M | 12% |
| Hardware | $6.9M | 3% |
| License And Maintenance | $2.6M | 1% |
