vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amer Sports, Inc. (AS) and Signing Day Sports, Inc. (SGN), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Amer Sports, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $30.6K, roughly 34344.9× Signing Day Sports, Inc.). Amer Sports, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1.8% vs -1852.1%, a 1853.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Amer Sports, Inc. is a Finnish multinational sporting equipment division based in Helsinki, Finland. Established in 1950 as an industrial conglomerate with interests as diverse as tobacco trading, ship owning and publishing, Amer has gradually evolved into a multinational firm devoted to the production and marketing of sporting goods. The company employs over 9,700 people. Since 2018, Amer has been a subsidiary of Chinese retail conglomerate Anta Sports.
Sportsdirect.com Retail Limited, trading as Sports Direct, is a British retail company owned by Frasers Group. The company was founded in 1982 by Mike Ashley and was originally based in Maidenhead, England. It specialises in the sale of sports equipment, clothing, footwear, and accessories, operating both physical outlets and an online store.
AS vs SGN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2024 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $30.6K |
| Net Profit | $19.0M | $-566.4K |
| Gross Margin | 52.8% | 71.7% |
| Operating Margin | 12.4% | -2840.2% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | -1852.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -44.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 64.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $30.6K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $66.8K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $148.4K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $120.6K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $55.4K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $205.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $234.6K | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $55.2K |
| Q3 25 | — | $-566.4K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-843.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-919.6K |
| Q3 25 | — | 71.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 92.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 90.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 67.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 69.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 52.8% | 70.6% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 81.5% |
| Q3 25 | — | -2840.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -2370.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -563.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2454.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -2596.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -549.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | -839.7% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -1083.3% |
| Q3 25 | — | -1852.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -2045.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -568.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2747.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -2893.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -640.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | -1064.6% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -1665.6% |
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.39 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.44 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.38 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.25 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-7.79 | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $-68.3K |
| Total Assets | — | $1.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $181.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $22.5K |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $10.1M |
| Q3 25 | — | $-68.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $361.1K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-511.8K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-915.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $230.1K | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-11.5M |
| Q3 25 | — | $1.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $114.3M | $-441.2K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 2.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 6.02× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q3 25 | — | $-441.2K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $422.6K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-515.4K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $114.3M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $422.6K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-526.4K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $92.2M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 350.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -950.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.8% | -789.4% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.1% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.02× | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.