vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ASML HOLDING NV (ASML) and LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORP (LSCC), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ASML Holding N.V. is a Dutch multinational corporation and semiconductor company that specializes in the development and manufacturing of photolithography machines which are used to produce integrated circuits. It is the largest supplier for the semiconductor industry, as well as the most advanced producer of extreme ultraviolet photolithography (EUV) machines that are required to manufacture the most advanced chips. As of January 2026, its market capitalization was approximately $527 billion...
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation is an American semiconductor company specializing in the design and manufacturing of low power field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs). Headquartered in the Silicon Forest area of Hillsboro, Oregon, the company also has operations in San Jose, Calif., Shanghai, Manila, Penang, and Singapore. Lattice Semiconductor has more than 1000 employees and an annual revenue of more than $660 million as of 2022. The company was founded in 1983 and went public in 1989. It ...
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $145.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $133.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $124.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $120.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $117.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $127.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $124.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $140.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-7.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $14.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 68.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 67.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 68.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 68.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 61.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 69.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 68.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 68.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 11.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | -5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.11 |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
