vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS INC (AXL) and BORGWARNER INC (BWA), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BORGWARNER INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.6B vs $1.4B, roughly 2.6× AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS INC). AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS INC runs the higher net margin — -5.4% vs -7.3%, a 1.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BORGWARNER INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.9% vs 0.2%). BORGWARNER INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($457.0M vs $54.7M). Over the past eight quarters, BORGWARNER INC's revenue compounded faster (-0.3% CAGR vs -7.2%).
American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. (AAM), headquartered in Detroit, Michigan, is an American manufacturer of automobile driveline and drivetrain components and systems.
BorgWarner Inc. is an American automotive and e-mobility supplier headquartered in Auburn Hills, Michigan. As of 2023, the company maintains production facilities and sites at 92 locations in 24 countries, and generates revenues of US$14.2 billion, while employing around 39,900 people. The company is one of the 25 largest automotive suppliers in the world. Since February 2025, Joseph F. Fadool has been CEO of BorgWarner Inc.
AXL vs BWA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $3.6B |
| Net Profit | $-75.3M | $-262.0M |
| Gross Margin | 10.2% | 20.5% |
| Operating Margin | -2.4% | -6.7% |
| Net Margin | -5.4% | -7.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.2% | 3.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -449.6% | 35.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.62 | $-1.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $3.6B |
| Q4 25 | $-75.3M | $-262.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.2M | $158.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $39.3M | $224.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $157.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.7M | $-405.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.0M | $234.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.2M | $303.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.5M | $206.0M |
| Q4 25 | 10.2% | 20.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.6% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | 18.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.4% | 18.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.3% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | 17.9% |
| Q4 25 | -2.4% | -6.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | 6.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | -9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.8% | 8.2% |
| Q4 25 | -5.4% | -7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.0% | -11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | 5.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.62 | $-1.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.07 | $0.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.32 | $1.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.72 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.11 | $-1.78 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | $1.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.15 | $1.34 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.17 | $0.90 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $708.9M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.0B | $3.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $640.0M | $5.4B |
| Total Assets | $6.7B | $13.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 6.31× | 0.72× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $708.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $714.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $586.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $549.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $552.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $542.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $519.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $469.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | $3.3B |
| Q4 25 | $640.0M | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $718.4M | $6.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $673.0M | $5.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $596.3M | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $562.8M | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $616.3M | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $609.6M | $6.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $621.4M | $5.8B |
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | $13.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $14.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $14.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.1B | $13.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $14.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $15.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $14.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4B | $14.1B |
| Q4 25 | 6.31× | 0.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.61× | 0.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.86× | 0.66× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.38× | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.58× | 0.68× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.28× | 0.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.42× | 0.54× | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.40× | 0.56× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $120.5M | $619.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $54.7M | $457.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.0% | 12.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 4.8% | 4.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $155.1M | $1.2B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $120.5M | $619.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.3M | $368.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.9M | $579.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.9M | $82.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.2M | $682.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $143.6M | $356.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $142.8M | $462.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.8M | $-118.0M |
| Q4 25 | $54.7M | $457.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.2M | $257.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.6M | $502.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.4M | $-37.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $73.2M | $521.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $70.4M | $201.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $94.0M | $297.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-30.2M | $-308.0M |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 12.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | -1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | 15.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.9% | -8.6% |
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.0% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.58× | 2.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.34× | 2.58× | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.87× | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.36× | 1.52× | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.85× | 1.52× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.87× | -0.57× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AXL
| Driveline | $748.4M | 54% |
| Other | $345.7M | 25% |
| Metal Forming | $289.8M | 21% |
BWA
| Foundational Products | $2.9B | 81% |
| Drivetrain Morse Systems | $506.0M | 14% |
| Power Drive Systems | $112.0M | 3% |
| Battery Charging Systems | $64.0M | 2% |
