vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of 中国移动 (BEEP) and Cable One, Inc. (CABO), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cable One, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($363.7M vs $8.8M, roughly 41.5× 中国移动). On growth, 中国移动 posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-4.3% vs -6.1%). Over the past eight quarters, 中国移动's revenue compounded faster (-0.4% CAGR vs -5.2%).
中国移动通信集团是中国的国有特大型电信企业，面向中国大陆及香港地区提供移动通信服务，旗下中国移动有限公司以“中国移动”为品牌开展业务，拥有覆盖全国的移动通信网络，截至2021年6月，用户规模达9.455亿，是中国用户规模最大的移动运营商，位列福布斯全球2000强第25位。
Cable One, Inc.是美国一家宽带通信服务商，以Sparklight为品牌面向美国24个州的110万个人及商业客户提供有线电视、互联网与电话服务。该公司还拥有Fidelity Communications品牌，在阿肯色、路易斯安那、密苏里、俄克拉荷马与德克萨斯提供同类通信服务，其总部坐落于亚利桑那州凤凰城。
BEEP vs CABO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.8M | $363.7M |
| Net Profit | $-7.5M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 25.2% |
| Net Margin | -85.6% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -4.3% | -6.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.49 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $8.8M | $363.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.1M | $376.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.0M | $381.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.2M | $380.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.2M | $387.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.8M | $393.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3M | $394.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.8M | $404.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-7.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.8M | $86.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.3M | $-438.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.9M | $2.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-999.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.3M | $44.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.4M | $38.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.1M | $37.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 25.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -128.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 26.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 29.6% |
| Q4 25 | -85.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -63.9% | 23.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -47.3% | -114.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -47.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -10.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -13.4% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -14.6% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.8% | 9.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.49 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $14.52 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-77.70 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.46 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-18.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.58 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.3M | $152.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $198.3M | $2.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $141.3M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $382.5M | $5.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.40× | 1.81× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $8.3M | $152.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1M | $166.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.6M | $152.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.6M | $149.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.7M | $153.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.7M | $226.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.7M | $201.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.1M | $210.7M |
| Q4 25 | $198.3M | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $183.3M | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $186.7M | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $187.5M | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $188.2M | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $132.8M | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.6M | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $134.5M | $3.6B |
| Q4 25 | $141.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $160.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $164.5M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $170.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $134.8M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.4M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $107.9M | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | $382.5M | $5.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $397.8M | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $405.6M | $5.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $409.5M | $6.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $415.1M | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $418.2M | $6.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $417.1M | $6.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $420.1M | $6.7B |
| Q4 25 | 1.40× | 1.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.21× | 1.88× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.16× | 2.16× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.14× | 1.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.11× | 1.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.99× | 1.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.24× | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.25× | 1.93× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-626.0K | $145.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $71.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 19.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | — | 20.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $278.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $-626.0K | $145.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $156.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8M | $144.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.5M | $116.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $227.0K | $167.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | $176.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $346.0K | $155.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.4M | $164.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $71.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $84.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $76.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $45.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $95.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $99.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $84.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $98.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 19.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 24.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 16.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 44.62× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.99× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.08× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.41× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BEEP
| Transient Parkers | $4.5M | 52% |
| Contract Parkers | $2.4M | 28% |
| Base Rent Income | $1.2M | 14% |
| Other | $607.0K | 7% |
CABO
Segment breakdown not available.
