vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Franklin Resources (BEN) and XP Inc. (XP), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
XP Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.5B vs $2.3B, roughly 5.8× Franklin Resources). Franklin Resources runs the higher net margin — 11.0% vs 0.0%, a 11.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Franklin Resources, Inc. is an American multinational investment management holding company that, together with its subsidiaries, is referred to as Franklin Templeton; it is a global investment firm founded in New York City in 1947 as Franklin Distributors, Inc. It is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol BEN, in honor of Benjamin Franklin, for whom the company is named, and who was admired by founder Rupert Johnson Sr. In 1973, the company's headquarters moved from Ne...
XP Inc. is a Brazilian investment management company. The company offers fixed income, equities, investment funds, and private pension products, as well as offers wealth management and other financial services. XP serves customers in Brazil and has offices in São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, New York, Miami, London and Geneva.
BEN vs XP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2026 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.3B | $13.5B |
| Net Profit | $255.5M | $22.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 12.1% | 1.1% |
| Net Margin | 11.0% | 0.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 56.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.46 | $536884.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $13.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $8.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $12.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $8.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $4.1B |
| Q4 25 | $255.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $117.6M | $22.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.3M | $22.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $151.4M | $22.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $163.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-84.7M | $21.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $174.0M | $21.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $124.2M | $21.0K |
| Q4 25 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.8% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.0% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.8% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.8% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.46 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.21 | $536884.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.15 | $537811.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.26 | $539533.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.20 | $550958.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.32 | $554030.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.23 | $556675.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $12.1B | $20.0B |
| Total Assets | $32.5B | $347.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.19× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $12.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.1B | $20.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2B | $20.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.3B | $20.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.5B | $19.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.9B | $19.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.9B | $19.5B |
| Q4 25 | $32.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.4B | $347.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.6B | $347.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.0B | $347.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.5B | $249.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.3B | $249.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.9B | $249.0B |
| Q4 25 | 0.19× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.24× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-255.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | -1.00× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $-255.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-50.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-145.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $558.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $528.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $136.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-51.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-87.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-217.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $488.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $482.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $94.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 61.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -1.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.18× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.89× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.33× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.89× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.04× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.10× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BEN
| Investment Advisory Management And Administrative Service | $1.8B | 79% |
| Sales And Distribution Fees | $388.7M | 17% |
| Shareholder Service | $70.9M | 3% |
| Service Other | $19.6M | 1% |
XP
Segment breakdown not available.
