vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BOK FINANCIAL CORP (BOKF) and Integra Resources Corp. (ITRG), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BOK FINANCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($345.3M vs $57.0M, roughly 6.1× Integra Resources Corp.). BOK FINANCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 51.3% vs -9.6%, a 61.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
BOK Financial Corporation — pronounced as letters, "B-O-K" — is a financial services holding company headquartered in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Offering a full complement of retail and commercial banking products and services across the American Midwest and Southwest, the company is one of the 50 largest financial services firms in the U.S., and the largest in Oklahoma.
Integra Bank Corporation was the parent of Integra Bank National Association, a retail bank headquartered in Evansville, Indiana that failed on July 29, 2011. As of March 31, 2010, Integra Bank had $2.9 billion in total assets and operated 67 banking centers and 116 ATMs at locations in Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, and Ohio. The Second Renaissance Revival building was constructed in 1913, and originally housed the National City Bank.
BOKF vs ITRG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q1 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $345.3M | $57.0M |
| Net Profit | $177.3M | $-5.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 66.2% | — |
| Net Margin | 51.3% | -9.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.90 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $345.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $337.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $328.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $316.3M | $57.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $313.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $308.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $296.0M | $41.2K | ||
| Q1 24 | $293.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $177.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $140.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.8M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $140.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $163.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $83.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 26.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 66.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 56.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 56.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 71.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 51.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.9% | -9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.90 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.22 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.19 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.86 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.13 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.18 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.54 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.29 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.6B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.9B | — |
| Total Assets | $52.2B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.78× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $52.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.78× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.80× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-237.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-296.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -85.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 16.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | -1.34× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $575.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $-237.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $867.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $89.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $541.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $246.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $463.5M | $5.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $179.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-296.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $838.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-28.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $493.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $209.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $417.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $138.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | -85.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 248.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 157.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 68.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 140.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -1.34× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.16× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.97× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.76× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.83× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.14× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BOKF
| Other | $148.2M | 43% |
| Brokerageandtradingrevenue | $42.4M | 12% |
| Transactioncardrevenue | $31.6M | 9% |
| Personaltrustrevenue | $30.6M | 9% |
| Trans Fund EF Tnetworkrevenue | $25.9M | 7% |
| Commercialaccountservicechargerevenue | $18.3M | 5% |
| Corporatetrustrevenue | $11.6M | 3% |
| Financial Service Other | $11.0M | 3% |
| Investmentmanagementservicesandother | $6.8M | 2% |
| Overdraftfeerevenue | $6.2M | 2% |
| Retailbrokeragerevenue | $5.4M | 2% |
| Investmentbankingrevenue | $3.2M | 1% |
| Merchantservicesrevenue | $2.5M | 1% |
| Automatedservicechargeandotherdepositfeerevenue | $1.5M | 0% |
ITRG
Segment breakdown not available.
